Re: [PATCH v2 03/11] HID: hid-input: add usage_index argument in input_mapping and event.

["Henrik Rydberg" <rydberg@euromail.se>]

Hi Benjamin,

> Currently, there is no way to know the index of the current field
> in the .input_mapping and .event callbacks  when this field is inside
> an array of HID fields.
> This patch forwards this index to the input_mapping and event
> callbacks.

I agree with the idea, but the function argument list is becoming
ridiculously long... Could we remove the usage pointer argument, at
least?

	int (*event)(struct hid_device *hdev, struct hid_field *field,
			unsigned int usage_index, __s32 value);


> @@ -1071,19 +1072,24 @@ static void hid_input_field(struct hid_device *hid, struct hid_field *field,
>  	for (n = 0; n < count; n++) {
>  
>  		if (HID_MAIN_ITEM_VARIABLE & field->flags) {
> -			hid_process_event(hid, field, &field->usage[n], value[n], interrupt);
> +			hid_process_event(hid, field, &field->usage[n], n,
> +				value[n], interrupt);
>  			continue;
>  		}
>  
>  		if (field->value[n] >= min && field->value[n] <= max
>  			&& field->usage[field->value[n] - min].hid
>  			&& search(value, field->value[n], count))
> -				hid_process_event(hid, field, &field->usage[field->value[n] - min], 0, interrupt);
> +				hid_process_event(hid, field,
> +					&field->usage[field->value[n] - min], n,
> +					0, interrupt);

Wrong index?

>  
>  		if (value[n] >= min && value[n] <= max
>  			&& field->usage[value[n] - min].hid
>  			&& search(field->value, value[n], count))
> -				hid_process_event(hid, field, &field->usage[value[n] - min], 1, interrupt);
> +				hid_process_event(hid, field,
> +					&field->usage[value[n] - min], n,
> +					1, interrupt);

Wrong index?

>  	}
>  
>  	memcpy(field->value, value, count * sizeof(__s32));

Thanks,
Henrik