mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] cifs: fix srcip_matches() for ipv6
@ 2013-01-17  2:36 Nickolai Zeldovich
  2013-01-17  3:51 ` Steve French
  2013-01-17 16:24 ` Jeff Layton
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Nickolai Zeldovich @ 2013-01-17  2:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Steve French; +Cc: Nickolai Zeldovich, linux-cifs, linux-kernel

srcip_matches() previously had code like this:

  srcip_matches(..., struct sockaddr *rhs) {
    /* ... */
    struct sockaddr_in6 *vaddr6 = (struct sockaddr_in6 *) &rhs;
    return ipv6_addr_equal(..., &vaddr6->sin6_addr);
  }

which interpreted the values on the stack after the 'rhs' pointer as an
ipv6 address.  The correct thing to do is to use 'rhs', not '&rhs'.

Signed-off-by: Nickolai Zeldovich <nickolai@csail.mit.edu>
---
 fs/cifs/connect.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/cifs/connect.c b/fs/cifs/connect.c
index 17c3643..12b3da3 100644
--- a/fs/cifs/connect.c
+++ b/fs/cifs/connect.c
@@ -1917,7 +1917,7 @@ srcip_matches(struct sockaddr *srcaddr, struct sockaddr *rhs)
 	}
 	case AF_INET6: {
 		struct sockaddr_in6 *saddr6 = (struct sockaddr_in6 *)srcaddr;
-		struct sockaddr_in6 *vaddr6 = (struct sockaddr_in6 *)&rhs;
+		struct sockaddr_in6 *vaddr6 = (struct sockaddr_in6 *)rhs;
 		return ipv6_addr_equal(&saddr6->sin6_addr, &vaddr6->sin6_addr);
 	}
 	default:
-- 
1.7.10.4


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] cifs: fix srcip_matches() for ipv6
  2013-01-17  2:36 [PATCH] cifs: fix srcip_matches() for ipv6 Nickolai Zeldovich
@ 2013-01-17  3:51 ` Steve French
  2013-01-17  4:04   ` Nickolai Zeldovich
  2013-01-17 16:24 ` Jeff Layton
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Steve French @ 2013-01-17  3:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Nickolai Zeldovich; +Cc: Steve French, linux-cifs, linux-kernel

Makes sense.

How did you discover this - did you have an ipv6 test case or by
inspection or ...?

On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 8:36 PM, Nickolai Zeldovich
<nickolai@csail.mit.edu> wrote:
> srcip_matches() previously had code like this:
>
>   srcip_matches(..., struct sockaddr *rhs) {
>     /* ... */
>     struct sockaddr_in6 *vaddr6 = (struct sockaddr_in6 *) &rhs;
>     return ipv6_addr_equal(..., &vaddr6->sin6_addr);
>   }
>
> which interpreted the values on the stack after the 'rhs' pointer as an
> ipv6 address.  The correct thing to do is to use 'rhs', not '&rhs'.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nickolai Zeldovich <nickolai@csail.mit.edu>
> ---
>  fs/cifs/connect.c |    2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/cifs/connect.c b/fs/cifs/connect.c
> index 17c3643..12b3da3 100644
> --- a/fs/cifs/connect.c
> +++ b/fs/cifs/connect.c
> @@ -1917,7 +1917,7 @@ srcip_matches(struct sockaddr *srcaddr, struct sockaddr *rhs)
>         }
>         case AF_INET6: {
>                 struct sockaddr_in6 *saddr6 = (struct sockaddr_in6 *)srcaddr;
> -               struct sockaddr_in6 *vaddr6 = (struct sockaddr_in6 *)&rhs;
> +               struct sockaddr_in6 *vaddr6 = (struct sockaddr_in6 *)rhs;
>                 return ipv6_addr_equal(&saddr6->sin6_addr, &vaddr6->sin6_addr);
>         }
>         default:
> --
> 1.7.10.4
>



-- 
Thanks,

Steve

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] cifs: fix srcip_matches() for ipv6
  2013-01-17  3:51 ` Steve French
@ 2013-01-17  4:04   ` Nickolai Zeldovich
  2013-01-21  7:41     ` Steve French
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Nickolai Zeldovich @ 2013-01-17  4:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Steve French; +Cc: Steve French, linux-cifs, linux-kernel

On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 10:51 PM, Steve French <smfrench@gmail.com> wrote:
> How did you discover this - did you have an ipv6 test case or by
> inspection or ...?

By mostly-automated inspection (i.e., with the help of a static
program analysis tool).

Nickolai.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] cifs: fix srcip_matches() for ipv6
  2013-01-17  2:36 [PATCH] cifs: fix srcip_matches() for ipv6 Nickolai Zeldovich
  2013-01-17  3:51 ` Steve French
@ 2013-01-17 16:24 ` Jeff Layton
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jeff Layton @ 2013-01-17 16:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Nickolai Zeldovich; +Cc: Steve French, linux-cifs, linux-kernel

On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 21:36:17 -0500
Nickolai Zeldovich <nickolai@csail.mit.edu> wrote:

> srcip_matches() previously had code like this:
> 
>   srcip_matches(..., struct sockaddr *rhs) {
>     /* ... */
>     struct sockaddr_in6 *vaddr6 = (struct sockaddr_in6 *) &rhs;
>     return ipv6_addr_equal(..., &vaddr6->sin6_addr);
>   }
> 
> which interpreted the values on the stack after the 'rhs' pointer as an
> ipv6 address.  The correct thing to do is to use 'rhs', not '&rhs'.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nickolai Zeldovich <nickolai@csail.mit.edu>
> ---
>  fs/cifs/connect.c |    2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/cifs/connect.c b/fs/cifs/connect.c
> index 17c3643..12b3da3 100644
> --- a/fs/cifs/connect.c
> +++ b/fs/cifs/connect.c
> @@ -1917,7 +1917,7 @@ srcip_matches(struct sockaddr *srcaddr, struct sockaddr *rhs)
>  	}
>  	case AF_INET6: {
>  		struct sockaddr_in6 *saddr6 = (struct sockaddr_in6 *)srcaddr;
> -		struct sockaddr_in6 *vaddr6 = (struct sockaddr_in6 *)&rhs;
> +		struct sockaddr_in6 *vaddr6 = (struct sockaddr_in6 *)rhs;
>  		return ipv6_addr_equal(&saddr6->sin6_addr, &vaddr6->sin6_addr);
>  	}
>  	default:

Nice catch...

Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] cifs: fix srcip_matches() for ipv6
  2013-01-17  4:04   ` Nickolai Zeldovich
@ 2013-01-21  7:41     ` Steve French
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Steve French @ 2013-01-21  7:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Nickolai Zeldovich; +Cc: Steve French, linux-cifs, linux-kernel

merged into cifs-2.6.git

On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 10:04 PM, Nickolai Zeldovich
<nickolai@csail.mit.edu> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 10:51 PM, Steve French <smfrench@gmail.com> wrote:
>> How did you discover this - did you have an ipv6 test case or by
>> inspection or ...?
>
> By mostly-automated inspection (i.e., with the help of a static
> program analysis tool).
>
> Nickolai.



-- 
Thanks,

Steve

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2013-01-21  7:41 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-01-17  2:36 [PATCH] cifs: fix srcip_matches() for ipv6 Nickolai Zeldovich
2013-01-17  3:51 ` Steve French
2013-01-17  4:04   ` Nickolai Zeldovich
2013-01-21  7:41     ` Steve French
2013-01-17 16:24 ` Jeff Layton

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®