From: Kyle McMartin <kmcmarti@redhat.com>
To: Stephan Mueller <stephan.mueller@atsec.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
rusty@rustcorp.com.au, jstancek@redhat.com,
herbert@gondor.hengli.com.au
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] fips: check whether a module registering an alg or template is signed
Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2013 11:15:57 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130206161557.GJ3751@redacted.bos.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51120E26.7030400@atsec.com>
On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 09:02:46AM +0100, Stephan Mueller wrote:
> On 05.02.2013 23:58:30, +0100, Kyle McMartin <kyle@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Kyle,
>
Thanks for the review, Stephan.
> Just reading this paragraph, there is one missing puzzle piece: the
> *entire* kernel crypto API must shut down, even if only one kernel
> module with one cipher (or block chaining mode, ...) has a broken signature.
>
> The overall requirement is: if one self test fails, the entire FIPS
> 140-2 crypto module must become unavailable. (please note and do not get
> confused by the overload of the term "module" -- we have the KOs the
> kernel loads, and we have something called a FIPS 140-2 module which is
> the entire crypto "library" subject to a FIPS 140-2 validation)
>
> This signature check is one self test required at runtime.
>
> I added comments inline into the patch.
>
> >
> > crypto_sig_check should return 1 (and allow the registration) if any
> > of the following are true:
> > + if (!crypto_sig_check(alg->cra_module))
> > + return -EINVAL;
>
> Instead of an EINVAL, the kernel either must panic(), or a global flag
> is introduced which is evaluated by every kernel crypto API call. If
> that flag is, say, false, none of the kernel crypto API calls must succeed.
Returning -EINVAL means the module does not successfully load, and
nothing is registered. I don't see why you would need to taint or panic,
if nothing untoward actually occured? I don't object to it, if it's
necessary, I just didn't think it was. If Herbert doesn't object to this
patch, I'd move the panic from kernel/module.c to here.
> > +
> > return crypto_set_driver_name(alg);
> > }
> >
> > @@ -435,6 +438,11 @@ int crypto_register_template(struct crypto_template *tmpl)
>
>
> I am wondering whether the modification of these two functions are
> sufficient. As I wrote in a previous email, there are a number of
> register functions the kernel crypto API exports and which are used.
>
Between these two, I believe all codepaths that could bring in a
mode, cipher, or other cryptographic algorithm are covered.
> > goto out;
> > }
regards, Kyle
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-06 16:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-22 18:43 [PATCH] MODSIGN: only panic in fips mode if sig_enforce is set Kyle McMartin
2013-01-22 23:17 ` Rusty Russell
2013-01-23 11:26 ` David Howells
2013-01-23 15:18 ` Stephan Mueller
2013-01-24 14:59 ` Kyle McMartin
2013-01-25 11:28 ` Stephan Mueller
2013-01-24 19:06 ` [PATCH] MODSIGN: flag modules that use cryptoapi and only panic if those are unsigned Kyle McMartin
2013-01-24 19:21 ` Kyle McMartin
2013-01-24 23:36 ` Rusty Russell
2013-01-25 5:45 ` Kyle McMartin
2013-01-25 12:42 ` Stephan Mueller
2013-02-03 23:34 ` Rusty Russell
2013-01-25 12:46 ` Stephan Mueller
2013-01-25 12:18 ` Stephan Mueller
2013-02-05 22:58 ` [RFC PATCH] fips: check whether a module registering an alg or template is signed Kyle McMartin
2013-02-06 8:02 ` Stephan Mueller
2013-02-06 16:15 ` Kyle McMartin [this message]
2013-02-06 17:45 ` Stephan Mueller
2013-02-06 18:18 ` Kyle McMartin
2013-01-25 0:14 ` [PATCH] MODSIGN: flag modules that use cryptoapi and only panic if those are unsigned David Howells
2013-01-25 3:20 ` Matthew Garrett
2013-01-25 12:23 ` Stephan Mueller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130206161557.GJ3751@redacted.bos.redhat.com \
--to=kmcmarti@redhat.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=herbert@gondor.hengli.com.au \
--cc=jstancek@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=stephan.mueller@atsec.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®