From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
To: device-mapper development <dm-devel@redhat.com>
Cc: Heinz Mauelshagen <heinzm@redhat.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>,
Paul Taysom <taysom@chromium.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Joe Thornber <ejt@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [dm-devel] dm: dm-cache fails to write the cache device in writethrough mode
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2013 22:15:49 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130323051549.GE5357@blackbox.djwong.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130323032715.GA7692@redhat.com>
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 11:27:16PM -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 22 2013 at 7:16pm -0400,
> Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 06:34:28PM -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> > > On Fri, Mar 22 2013 at 4:11pm -0400,
> > > Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > The new writethrough strategy for dm-cache issues a bio to the origin device,
> > > > remaps the bio to the cache device, and issues the bio to the cache device.
> > > > However, the block layer modifies bi_sector and bi_size, so we need to preserve
> > > > these or else nothing gets written to the cache (bi_size == 0). This fixes the
> > > > problem where someone writes a block through the cache, but a subsequent reread
> > > > (from the cache) returns old contents.
> > >
> > > Your writethrough blkid test results are certainly strange. But I'm not
> > > aware of where the block layer would modify bi_size and bi_sector;
> > > please elaborate.
> > >
> > > I cannot reproduce your original report. I developed
> > > 'test_writethrough_ext4_uuids_match', apologies for the ruby code:
> >
> > Hmm... I'm building my kernels off 0a7e453103b9718d357688b83bb968ee108cc874 in
> > Linus' tree (post 3.9-rc3). This is the full output of dmsetup table:
> >
> > moocache-blocks: 0 1039360 linear 8:16 9088
> > moocache-metadata: 0 8704 linear 8:16 384
> > moocache: 0 67108864 cache 253:0 253:1 8:0 512 1 writethrough default 4 random_threshold 4 sequential_threshold 32768
> >
> > 253:0 -> moocache-metadata and 253:1 -> moocache-blocks.
> >
> > I'm curious what your setup is...
>
> Here are the tables:
> test-dev-238267: 0 8192 linear /dev/stec/metadata 0
> test-dev-255913: 0 2097152 linear /dev/stec/metadata 8192
> test-dev-655144: 0 20480 linear /dev/spindle/data 0
> 0 20480 cache /dev/mapper/test-dev-238267 /dev/mapper/test-dev-255913 /dev/mapper/test-dev-655144 512 1 writethrough default 0
>
> And I tweaked 'test_writethrough_ext4_uuids_match' to make sure to use the
> same thresholds you're using, full status output:
> 0 20480 cache 15/1024 0 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 writethrough 2 migration_threshold 32768 4 random_threshold 4 sequential_threshold 512
>
> So the big difference is the thinp-test-suite uses intermediate linear
> DM layers above the slower sd device (spindle/data) -- whereas in your
> setup the origin device is direct to sd (8:0).
>
> I'll re-run with the origin directly on sd in the morning and will
> report back.
Interesting ... if I set up this:
# echo "0 67108864 linear /dev/sda 0" | dmsetup create origin
And then repeat the test, but using /dev/mapper/origin as the origin instead
of /dev/sda, the problem goes away.
--D
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-23 5:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-22 20:11 [PATCH] " Darrick J. Wong
2013-03-22 20:21 ` Ben Hutchings
2013-03-22 20:50 ` Darrick J. Wong
2013-03-22 21:35 ` Mike Snitzer
2013-03-22 22:34 ` Mike Snitzer
2013-03-22 23:16 ` [dm-devel] " Darrick J. Wong
2013-03-23 3:27 ` Mike Snitzer
2013-03-23 3:48 ` [dm-devel] " Alasdair G Kergon
2013-03-23 5:15 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2013-03-23 21:08 ` Mike Snitzer
2013-03-23 22:56 ` Mike Snitzer
2013-03-25 23:59 ` [PATCH v2] dm cache: fix writes to " Mike Snitzer
2013-03-23 21:13 ` [dm-devel] dm: dm-cache fails to write the " Alasdair G Kergon
2013-03-23 3:00 ` [dm-devel] [PATCH] " Alasdair G Kergon
2013-03-25 10:28 ` Joe Thornber
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130323051549.GE5357@blackbox.djwong.org \
--to=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=ejt@redhat.com \
--cc=heinzm@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mpatocka@redhat.com \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=taysom@chromium.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®