* [PATCH] ASoC: max98090: request IRQF_ONESHOT interrupt
@ 2013-05-20 5:58 Andrew Bresticker
2013-05-20 13:01 ` Mark Brown
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Bresticker @ 2013-05-20 5:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: alsa-devel
Cc: Liam Girdwood, Mark Brown, Jaroslav Kysela, Takashi Iwai,
Sachin Kamat, Ralph Birt, Kuninori Morimoto, linux-kernel,
Andrew Bresticker
request_threaded_irq() rejects calls which both do not specify a handler
(indicating that the primary IRQ handler should be used) and do not set
IRQF_ONESHOT because the combination is unsafe with level-triggered
interrupts. It is safe in this case, though, since max98090 IRQs are
edge-triggered and the interrupts aren't ACK'ed until the codec's IRQ
status register is read. Because of this, an IRQF_ONESHOT interrupt
doesn't really make a difference, but request one anyway in order to make
request_threaded_irq() happy.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bresticker <abrestic@chromium.org>
---
sound/soc/codecs/max98090.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/codecs/max98090.c b/sound/soc/codecs/max98090.c
index cbb272b..1bf96bd 100644
--- a/sound/soc/codecs/max98090.c
+++ b/sound/soc/codecs/max98090.c
@@ -2247,7 +2247,7 @@ static int max98090_probe(struct snd_soc_codec *codec)
dev_dbg(codec->dev, "irq = %d\n", max98090->irq);
ret = request_threaded_irq(max98090->irq, NULL,
- max98090_interrupt, IRQF_TRIGGER_FALLING,
+ max98090_interrupt, IRQF_TRIGGER_FALLING | IRQF_ONESHOT,
"max98090_interrupt", codec);
if (ret < 0) {
dev_err(codec->dev, "request_irq failed: %d\n",
--
1.8.2.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] ASoC: max98090: request IRQF_ONESHOT interrupt
2013-05-20 5:58 [PATCH] ASoC: max98090: request IRQF_ONESHOT interrupt Andrew Bresticker
@ 2013-05-20 13:01 ` Mark Brown
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Mark Brown @ 2013-05-20 13:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Bresticker
Cc: alsa-devel, Liam Girdwood, Jaroslav Kysela, Takashi Iwai,
Sachin Kamat, Ralph Birt, Kuninori Morimoto, linux-kernel
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 642 bytes --]
On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 10:58:07PM -0700, Andrew Bresticker wrote:
> request_threaded_irq() rejects calls which both do not specify a handler
> (indicating that the primary IRQ handler should be used) and do not set
> IRQF_ONESHOT because the combination is unsafe with level-triggered
> interrupts. It is safe in this case, though, since max98090 IRQs are
Applied, thanks. If request_threaded_irq() is rejecting these that's
not ideal - some threaded interrupts can only be generated from within
threaded context and therefore can't have primary handlers. Unless it
only rejects in the case where the parent IRQ is a hard IRQ of course.
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-05-20 13:01 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-05-20 5:58 [PATCH] ASoC: max98090: request IRQF_ONESHOT interrupt Andrew Bresticker
2013-05-20 13:01 ` Mark Brown
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®