mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oskar Andero <oskar.andero@sonymobile.com>
To: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-input@vger.kernel.org" <linux-input@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Makarov, Aleksej" <Aleksej.Makarov@sonymobile.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] input: don't call input_dev_release_keys() in resume
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2013 09:44:41 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130712074441.GC3778@caracas.corpusers.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130705074632.GF11422@caracas.corpusers.net>

On 09:46 Fri 05 Jul     , Oskar Andero wrote:
> Hi Dmitry,
> 
> On 18:33 Thu 04 Apr     , Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > Hi Oskar,
> > 
> > On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 03:01:22PM +0100, oskar.andero@sonymobile.com wrote:
> > > From: Aleksej Makarov <aleksej.makarov@sonymobile.com>
> > >
> > > When waking up the platform by pressing a specific key, sending a
> > > release on that key makes it impossible to react on the event in
> > > user-space.
> > >
> > 
> > No, we can not simply not release keys after resume from suspend, as
> > this leads to keys being stuck. Consider you are holding an 'I' key on
> > your external USB keyboard and close your laptop's lid. Then you release
> > the key and leave. Later you come back, open the lid waking the laptop
> > and observe endless stream of 'I' in your open terminal.
> > 
> > Maybe we should release the keys during suspend time? I am not sure how
> > Android infrastructure will react to this though...
> 
> I finally got the time to try this out. Releasing the keys in suspend
> also solves our problem. Would such patch work for the USB keyboard
> case you described? Theoretically, I think it should, right?
> 
> So, basically:
> 
> static int input_dev_suspend(struct device *dev)
>  {
>         struct input_dev *input_dev = to_input_dev(dev);
>  
> -       mutex_lock(&input_dev->mutex);
> -
> -       if (input_dev->users)
> -               input_dev_toggle(input_dev, false);
> -
> -       mutex_unlock(&input_dev->mutex);
> +       input_reset_device(input_dev);
>  
>         return 0;
>  }
>  
>  static int input_dev_resume(struct device *dev)
>  {
> -       struct input_dev *input_dev = to_input_dev(dev);
> -
> -       input_reset_device(input_dev);
> -
>         return 0;
>  }
> 
> Should I send the patch?

Ping. Any thoughts on this?

Thanks!

-Oskar


      reply	other threads:[~2013-07-12  7:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-03-07 14:01 oskar.andero
2013-04-04 14:57 ` Oskar Andero
2013-04-04 16:33 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2013-04-05  8:57   ` Oskar Andero
2013-07-05  7:46   ` Oskar Andero
2013-07-12  7:44     ` Oskar Andero [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130712074441.GC3778@caracas.corpusers.net \
    --to=oskar.andero@sonymobile.com \
    --cc=Aleksej.Makarov@sonymobile.com \
    --cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome