* checkpatch.pl: false warning about "-p0 patch"
@ 2013-08-22 21:45 Brian Norris
2013-08-22 21:57 ` Joe Perches
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Brian Norris @ 2013-08-22 21:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andy Whitcroft, Joe Perches; +Cc: Linux Kernel
Hello,
I have received what appears to be a false warning from checkpatch.pl when
checking a patch named 'b':
$ scripts/checkpatch.pl b
WARNING: patch prefix 'b' exists, appears to be a -p0 patch
total: 0 errors, 1 warnings, 16 lines checked
b has style problems, please review.
If any of these errors are false positives, please report
them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS.
It appears that I can trigger this warning with any arbitrary commit. The
following bash script gives me at least one warning for everything in Linus'
tree:
for i in {0..100}
do
git format-patch -1 HEAD~$i --stdout > b
scripts/checkpatch.pl b
done
I have also seen this warning on patches with other names, but I'm not
reproducing that right now.
Brian
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: checkpatch.pl: false warning about "-p0 patch"
2013-08-22 21:45 checkpatch.pl: false warning about "-p0 patch" Brian Norris
@ 2013-08-22 21:57 ` Joe Perches
2013-08-22 22:14 ` Brian Norris
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Joe Perches @ 2013-08-22 21:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Brian Norris; +Cc: Andy Whitcroft, Linux Kernel
On Thu, 2013-08-22 at 14:45 -0700, Brian Norris wrote:
> Hello,
Hello.
> I have received what appears to be a false warning from checkpatch.pl when
> checking a patch named 'b':
>
> $ scripts/checkpatch.pl b
> WARNING: patch prefix 'b' exists, appears to be a -p0 patch
>
> total: 0 errors, 1 warnings, 16 lines checked
>
> b has style problems, please review.
>
> If any of these errors are false positives, please report
> them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS.
>
> It appears that I can trigger this warning with any arbitrary commit. The
> following bash script gives me at least one warning for everything in Linus'
> tree:
>
> for i in {0..100}
> do
> git format-patch -1 HEAD~$i --stdout > b
> scripts/checkpatch.pl b
> done
>
> I have also seen this warning on patches with other names, but I'm not
> reproducing that right now.
checkpatch can use stdin as well as files/patches.
Try this instead of creating a temporary file:
for i in {0..100}
do
git format-patch -1 --stdout HEAD~$1 | ./scripts/checkpatch.pl -
done
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: checkpatch.pl: false warning about "-p0 patch"
2013-08-22 21:57 ` Joe Perches
@ 2013-08-22 22:14 ` Brian Norris
2013-08-22 22:30 ` Joe Perches
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Brian Norris @ 2013-08-22 22:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Joe Perches; +Cc: Andy Whitcroft, Linux Kernel
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 2:57 PM, Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-08-22 at 14:45 -0700, Brian Norris wrote:
>> Hello,
>
> Hello.
>
>> I have received what appears to be a false warning from checkpatch.pl when
>> checking a patch named 'b':
>>
>> $ scripts/checkpatch.pl b
>> WARNING: patch prefix 'b' exists, appears to be a -p0 patch
>>
>> total: 0 errors, 1 warnings, 16 lines checked
>>
>> b has style problems, please review.
>>
>> If any of these errors are false positives, please report
>> them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS.
>>
>> It appears that I can trigger this warning with any arbitrary commit. The
>> following bash script gives me at least one warning for everything in Linus'
>> tree:
>>
>> for i in {0..100}
>> do
>> git format-patch -1 HEAD~$i --stdout > b
>> scripts/checkpatch.pl b
>> done
>>
>> I have also seen this warning on patches with other names, but I'm not
>> reproducing that right now.
>
> checkpatch can use stdin as well as files/patches.
>
> Try this instead of creating a temporary file:
>
> for i in {0..100}
> do
> git format-patch -1 --stdout HEAD~$1 | ./scripts/checkpatch.pl -
> done
Thanks for the tip. This for-loop was just a litmus test to show that
checkpatch.pl is indeed failing simply because of the filename of 'b'.
So I would consider that a checkpatch.pl bug.
But now, I realized the problem is simply with the existence of a file
named 'b'. That is, checkpatch will give a warning for this:
touch b
git format-patch -1 --stdout | scripts/checkpatch.pl -
WARNING: patch prefix 'b' exists, appears to be a -p0 patch
WARNING: patch prefix 'b' exists, appears to be a -p0 patch
WARNING: patch prefix 'b' exists, appears to be a -p0 patch
...
Is that expected?
Brian
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: checkpatch.pl: false warning about "-p0 patch"
2013-08-22 22:14 ` Brian Norris
@ 2013-08-22 22:30 ` Joe Perches
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Joe Perches @ 2013-08-22 22:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Brian Norris; +Cc: Andy Whitcroft, Linux Kernel
On Thu, 2013-08-22 at 15:14 -0700, Brian Norris wrote:
> I realized the problem is simply with the existence of a file
> named 'b'. That is, checkpatch will give a warning for this:
> touch b
> git format-patch -1 --stdout | scripts/checkpatch.pl -
> WARNING: patch prefix 'b' exists, appears to be a -p0 patch
> Is that expected?
Yes. Basically, don't have a file (or a directory)
named a or b in the kernel root directory.
if (!$file && $tree && $p1_prefix ne '' &&
-e "$root/$p1_prefix") {
WARN("PATCH_PREFIX",
"patch prefix '$p1_prefix' exists, appears to be a -p0 patch\n");
}
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-08-22 22:30 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-08-22 21:45 checkpatch.pl: false warning about "-p0 patch" Brian Norris
2013-08-22 21:57 ` Joe Perches
2013-08-22 22:14 ` Brian Norris
2013-08-22 22:30 ` Joe Perches
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®