Re: [PATCH 00/10] ASoC: dma: ARM: ux500: Obtain DMA data from Device Tree

[Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1492 bytes --]

On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 05:37:30PM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> >> Are you/did you already tak(e)ing this set?

> > Don't send contentless nags, they're just noise.

> Countless. Errr... 1 after 10 days!

Contentless means there's no content in the e-mail rather than that it's
too soon or something.  

In general you should either engage with the prior discussion (for
example here by asking where the patches are if they've not appeared as
expected and/or sending the patches you were asked to send) or resend
patches if there was no response at all (since if patches have been
dropped there's a good chance people don't have them any more).

> > Looking at my sent mail folder I see:

> > | I'm happy to merge the first few patches if that's easiest for everyone
> > | else, let me know and send them to me if that's what works for people.

> > which doesn't seem to have happened.

> I'm confused. Why do you want them to be resent?

You only sent me the ASoC portion of the series, I didn't get the
arch/arm bits since you didn't copy me on them.  I assumed those were
the patches you were taking about.

> What about the patches which are not in the 'first few'?

> I took a look at asoc/topic/ux500, which was mentioned in the same
> reply, but they don't appear to be there? Am I looking at a different tree?

Repushed now.  There was one patch I asked for updates to and which (as
I said) I guess probably depends on the patches you didn't send me.

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]