From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: dietmar.eggemann@arm.com
Cc: mingo@redhat.com, vincent.guittot@linaro.org,
morten.rasmussen@arm.com, chris.redpath@arm.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 5/8] sched: introduce common topology level init function
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2013 15:04:51 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131220140451.GV16438@laptop.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1386936688-29113-6-git-send-email-dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
> +/*
> + * SD_flags allowed in topology descriptions.
> + *
> + * SD_SHARE_CPUPOWER - describes SMT topologies
> + * SD_SHARE_PKG_RESOURCES - describes shared caches
> + * SD_NUMA - describes NUMA topologies
> + *
> + * Odd one out:
> + * SD_ASYM_PACKING - describes SMT quirks
> + *
> + * SD_PREFER_SIBLING - describes preference for sibling domain
> + */
> +#define TOPOLOGY_SD_FLAGS \
> + (SD_SHARE_CPUPOWER | \
> + SD_SHARE_PKG_RESOURCES | \
> + SD_NUMA | \
> + SD_ASYM_PACKING | \
> + SD_PREFER_SIBLING)
See SD_PREFER_SIBLING is behavioural, the exact kinda thing we want to
keep out of this mask,
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-12-20 14:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-12-13 12:11 [RFC PATCH 0/8] change scheduler domain hierarchy set-up dietmar.eggemann
2013-12-13 12:11 ` [RFC PATCH 1/8] sched: arch interface for scheduler domain setup dietmar.eggemann
2013-12-13 12:11 ` [RFC PATCH 2/8] arm: implement " dietmar.eggemann
2013-12-13 12:11 ` [RFC PATCH 3/8] x86: " dietmar.eggemann
2013-12-13 12:11 ` [RFC PATCH 4/8] sched: allocate the entire topology array dynamically dietmar.eggemann
2013-12-13 12:11 ` [RFC PATCH 5/8] sched: introduce common topology level init function dietmar.eggemann
2013-12-20 14:04 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2014-01-06 18:41 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2013-12-13 12:11 ` [RFC PATCH 6/8] sched: replace for_each_sd_topology with explicit for loop dietmar.eggemann
2013-12-13 12:11 ` [RFC PATCH 7/8] sched: replace topology level init func ptr with sd_init dietmar.eggemann
2013-12-13 12:11 ` [RFC PATCH 8/8] sched: remove scheduler domain naming dietmar.eggemann
2013-12-20 14:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-06 18:41 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2014-01-07 10:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-07 14:33 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2013-12-20 14:00 ` [RFC PATCH 0/8] change scheduler domain hierarchy set-up Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-06 18:40 ` Dietmar Eggemann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131220140451.GV16438@laptop.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=chris.redpath@arm.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=morten.rasmussen@arm.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome