mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>
To: Kevin Hao <haokexin@gmail.com>,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Kevin Hao <haokexin@gmail.com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] of: reimplement the matching method for __of_match_node()
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 12:57:55 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140219125755.9FA9CC4088D@trevor.secretlab.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1392797745-7561-1-git-send-email-haokexin@gmail.com>

On Wed, 19 Feb 2014 16:15:45 +0800, Kevin Hao <haokexin@gmail.com> wrote:
> In the current implementation of __of_match_node(), it will compare
> each given match entry against all the node's compatible strings
> with of_device_is_compatible().
> 
> To achieve multiple compatible strings per node with ordering from
> specific to generic, this requires given matches to be ordered from
> specific to generic. For most of the drivers this is not true and
> also an alphabetical ordering is more sane there.
> 
> Therefore, we define a following priority order for the match, and
> then scan all the entries to find the best match.
>   1. specific compatible && type && name
>   2. specific compatible && type
>   3. specific compatible && name
>   4. specific compatible
>   5. general compatible && type && name
>   6. general compatible && type
>   7. general compatible && name
>   8. general compatible
>   9. type && name
>   10. type
>   11. name
> 
> This is based on some pseudo-codes provided by Grant Likely.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hao <haokexin@gmail.com>
> [grant.likely: Changed multiplier to 4 which makes more sense]
> Signed-off-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>
> ---
> v3: Also need to bail out when there does have a compatible member in match
>     entry, but it doesn't match with the device node's compatible.
>  
> v2: Fix the bug such as we get the same score for the following two match
> entries:
> 	name2 { }
> 
> 	struct of_device_id matches[] = {
> 		{.name = "name2", },
> 		{.name = "name2", .type = "type1", },
> 		{}
> 	};

BTW, I prefer patch version information like the above to appear before
the '---' line so that it shows up in the final commit log. It is often
useful to have the revision history in mainline.

> 
>  drivers/of/base.c | 96 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
>  1 file changed, 77 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/of/base.c b/drivers/of/base.c
> index ba195fbce4c6..8f79f006d86f 100644
> --- a/drivers/of/base.c
> +++ b/drivers/of/base.c
> @@ -342,21 +342,28 @@ struct device_node *of_get_cpu_node(int cpu, unsigned int *thread)
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(of_get_cpu_node);
>  
> -/** Checks if the given "compat" string matches one of the strings in
> - * the device's "compatible" property
> +/*
> + * Compare with the __of_device_is_compatible, this will return a score for the
> + * matching strings. The smaller value indicates the match for the more specific
> + * compatible string.
>   */
> -static int __of_device_is_compatible(const struct device_node *device,
> -				     const char *compat)
> +static int __of_device_is_compatible_score(const struct device_node *device,
> +				     const char *compat, int *pscore)
>  {

Another note: I've removed this new function. There are only three users
of __of_device_is_compatible, and they are all in this file. Adding a
field is just fine. I'm also considering rolling the name and
device_type checks into this function, but that goes beyond the bug fix
so it will wait until the next merge window.

g.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-02-19 12:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-02-18 22:31 Bug fix and test matching method for of_match_node() Grant Likely
2014-02-18 22:31 ` [PATCH 1/4] Revert "of: search the best compatible match first in __of_match_node()" Grant Likely
2014-02-18 22:31 ` [PATCH 2/4] of: reimplement the matching method for __of_match_node() Grant Likely
2014-02-19  6:21   ` [PATCH v2 " Kevin Hao
2014-02-19  7:58     ` Kevin Hao
2014-02-19  8:15       ` [PATCH v3 " Kevin Hao
2014-02-19 12:48         ` Grant Likely
2014-02-19 12:57         ` Grant Likely [this message]
2014-02-18 22:31 ` [PATCH 3/4] of: Move testcase FDT data into drivers/of Grant Likely
2014-02-18 22:31 ` [PATCH 4/4] of: Add self test for of_match_node() Grant Likely
2014-02-19  6:31   ` Kevin Hao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140219125755.9FA9CC4088D@trevor.secretlab.ca \
    --to=grant.likely@linaro.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=haokexin@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®