From: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Corey Ashford <cjashfor@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] perf tools: Share map groups within process
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2014 15:14:06 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140318191406.GU25953@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1395154016-26709-1-git-send-email-jolsa@redhat.com>
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 03:46:50PM +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> hi,
> this patchset moves thread's map_groups to be dynamically
> allocated and shared within process threads.
>
> The main benefit would be to be able to look up memory
> map from any thread that belongs to the process.
>
> This implements one of the solution ideas for issue
> described by Don in following thread:
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=139403876017159&w=2
>
> RFC changes:
> - added automated test for thread map groups get/put methods
> - fix reference count for case described by Namhyung
> - rename the mmap-events.c test to mmap-thread-lookup.c
> - added PROT_EXEC to mmap call in tests/mmap-thread-lookup.c
> as it's not implied by default on all archs (Namhyung)
> - lazy mg allocation in thread__find_addr_map (Namhyung)
> - fix compilation failures (Arnaldo)
>
> also available in here:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jolsa/perf.git
> perf/core_mmaps
I ran this patchset through my multi-threaded java test (SPECJBB) and saw
no issues. The threads seemed to have matched with their pids properly.
I even took an old perf.data file (with old synthesized mmap2 events using
pids) and the tids from the samples matched the pids correctly (for what
it is worth).
So I will add my
Tested-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com>
I don't know the code well enough to know if it is right or not, but my
quick review didn't see anything wrong.
Cheers,
Don
>
> thanks,
> jirka
>
>
> Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
> Cc: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com>
> Cc: Corey Ashford <cjashfor@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>
> ---
> Jiri Olsa (6):
> perf tests: Add thread maps lookup automated tests
> perf tools: Remove thread__find_map function
> perf tools: Allocate thread map_groups dynamically
> perf tools: Add machine pointer into thread struct
> perf tools: Share process map groups within process threads
> perf tests: Add map groups sharing with thread object test
>
> tools/perf/Makefile.perf | 2 +
> tools/perf/arch/x86/tests/dwarf-unwind.c | 9 +++-
> tools/perf/perf.h | 6 +++
> tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c | 8 ++++
> tools/perf/tests/mmap-thread-lookup.c | 233 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> tools/perf/tests/tests.h | 2 +
> tools/perf/tests/thread-mg-share.c | 110 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> tools/perf/ui/stdio/hist.c | 9 +++-
> tools/perf/util/event.c | 10 +++-
> tools/perf/util/machine.c | 8 ++--
> tools/perf/util/map.h | 3 +-
> tools/perf/util/thread.c | 120 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> tools/perf/util/thread.h | 19 ++++----
> 13 files changed, 508 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 tools/perf/tests/mmap-thread-lookup.c
> create mode 100644 tools/perf/tests/thread-mg-share.c
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-18 19:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-03-18 14:46 Jiri Olsa
2014-03-18 14:46 ` [PATCH 1/6] perf tests: Add thread maps lookup automated tests Jiri Olsa
2014-03-18 14:46 ` [PATCH 2/6] perf tools: Remove thread__find_map function Jiri Olsa
2014-03-19 13:08 ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Jiri Olsa
2014-03-18 14:46 ` [PATCH 3/6] perf tools: Allocate thread map_groups dynamically Jiri Olsa
2014-03-18 14:46 ` [PATCH 4/6] perf tools: Add machine pointer into thread struct Jiri Olsa
2014-03-18 14:46 ` [PATCH 5/6] perf tools: Share process map groups within process threads Jiri Olsa
2014-03-18 14:46 ` [PATCH 6/6] perf tests: Add map groups sharing with thread object test Jiri Olsa
2014-03-18 19:14 ` Don Zickus [this message]
2014-03-19 0:46 ` [PATCH 0/6] perf tools: Share map groups within process Namhyung Kim
2014-03-20 8:33 ` Jiri Olsa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140318191406.GU25953@redhat.com \
--to=dzickus@redhat.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=acme@ghostprotocols.net \
--cc=cjashfor@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=dsahern@gmail.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome