mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, morten.rasmussen@arm.com,
	mingo@kernel.org, george.mccollister@gmail.com,
	ktkhai@parallels.com
Subject: [PATCH] sched: clean up select_task_rq_fair conditionals and indentation
Date: Fri, 9 May 2014 02:04:11 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140509020411.34adbd29@annuminas.surriel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140509012743.67d4006d@annuminas.surriel.com>

This cleanup goes on top of the previous patch. We could also skip the
whole domain iteration if !want_affine, but that doesn't fit nicely in
80 columns and may have to be done in yet another patch (breaking that
bit of the code out into its own function?)

---8<---

Subject: sched: clean up select_task_rq_fair conditionals and indentation

The whole top half of select_task_rq_fair is only run if
sd_flag & SD_BALANCE_WAKE. The code should probably reflect
that.

Also remove the useless new_cpu = prev_cpu assignment, as the
value of new_cpu is not actually used.

Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
---
 kernel/sched/fair.c | 47 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 5d33fb1b..844807b 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -4424,37 +4424,38 @@ select_task_rq_fair(struct task_struct *p, int prev_cpu, int sd_flag, int wake_f
 	if (p->nr_cpus_allowed == 1)
 		return prev_cpu;
 
+	rcu_read_lock();
 	if (sd_flag & SD_BALANCE_WAKE) {
 		if (cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, tsk_cpus_allowed(p)))
 			want_affine = 1;
-		new_cpu = prev_cpu;
-	}
 
-	rcu_read_lock();
-	for_each_domain(cpu, tmp) {
-		if (!(tmp->flags & SD_LOAD_BALANCE))
-			continue;
+		for_each_domain(cpu, tmp) {
+			if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, tsk_cpus_allowed(p)))
+				break;
 
-		/*
-		 * If both cpu and prev_cpu are part of this domain,
-		 * cpu is a valid SD_WAKE_AFFINE target.
-		 */
-		if (want_affine && (tmp->flags & SD_WAKE_AFFINE) &&
-		    cpumask_test_cpu(prev_cpu, sched_domain_span(tmp))) {
-			affine_sd = tmp;
-			break;
-		}
+			if (!(tmp->flags & SD_LOAD_BALANCE))
+				continue;
 
-		if (tmp->flags & sd_flag)
-			sd = tmp;
-	}
+			/*
+			 * If both cpu and prev_cpu are part of this domain,
+			 * cpu is a valid SD_WAKE_AFFINE target.
+			 */
+			if (want_affine && (tmp->flags & SD_WAKE_AFFINE) &&
+			    cpumask_test_cpu(prev_cpu,
+					     sched_domain_span(tmp))) {
+				affine_sd = tmp;
+				break;
+			}
 
-	if (affine_sd) {
-		if (cpu != prev_cpu && wake_affine(affine_sd, p, sync))
-			prev_cpu = cpu;
-	}
+			if (tmp->flags & sd_flag)
+				sd = tmp;
+		}
+
+		if (affine_sd) {
+			if (cpu != prev_cpu && wake_affine(affine_sd, p, sync))
+				prev_cpu = cpu;
+		}
 
-	if (sd_flag & SD_BALANCE_WAKE) {
 		new_cpu = select_idle_sibling(p, prev_cpu);
 		goto unlock;
 	}


  reply	other threads:[~2014-05-09  6:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-05-02  4:42 [PATCH RFC/TEST] sched: make sync affine wakeups work Rik van Riel
2014-05-02  5:32 ` Mike Galbraith
2014-05-02  5:41   ` Mike Galbraith
2014-05-02  5:58   ` Mike Galbraith
2014-05-02  6:08     ` Rik van Riel
2014-05-02  6:36       ` Mike Galbraith
2014-05-02  6:51         ` Mike Galbraith
2014-05-02  6:13 ` Mike Galbraith
2014-05-02  6:30   ` Rik van Riel
2014-05-02  7:37     ` Mike Galbraith
2014-05-02 10:56       ` Rik van Riel
2014-05-02 11:27         ` Mike Galbraith
2014-05-02 12:51           ` Mike Galbraith
     [not found]           ` <5363B793.9010208@redhat.com>
2014-05-06 11:54             ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-06 20:19               ` Rik van Riel
2014-05-06 20:39                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-06 23:46                   ` Rik van Riel
2014-05-09  2:20                   ` Rik van Riel
2014-05-09  5:27                     ` [PATCH] sched: wake up task on prev_cpu if not in SD_WAKE_AFFINE domain with cpu Rik van Riel
2014-05-09  6:04                       ` Rik van Riel [this message]
2014-05-09  7:34                       ` Mike Galbraith
2014-05-09 14:22                         ` Rik van Riel
2014-05-09 15:24                           ` Mike Galbraith
2014-05-09 15:24                             ` Rik van Riel
2014-05-09 17:55                               ` Mike Galbraith
2014-05-09 18:16                                 ` Rik van Riel
2014-05-10  3:54                                   ` Mike Galbraith
2014-05-13 14:08                                     ` Rik van Riel
2014-05-14  4:08                                       ` Mike Galbraith
2014-05-14 15:40                                         ` [PATCH] sched: call select_idle_sibling when not affine_sd Rik van Riel
2014-05-14 15:45                                           ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-19 13:08                                           ` [tip:sched/core] " tip-bot for Rik van Riel
2014-05-22 12:27                                           ` [tip:sched/core] sched: Call select_idle_sibling() " tip-bot for Rik van Riel
2014-05-04 11:44     ` [PATCH RFC/TEST] sched: make sync affine wakeups work Preeti Murthy
2014-05-04 12:04       ` Mike Galbraith
2014-05-05  4:38         ` Preeti U Murthy
2014-05-04 12:41       ` Rik van Riel
2014-05-05  4:50         ` Preeti U Murthy
2014-05-05  6:43           ` Preeti U Murthy
2014-05-05 11:28           ` Rik van Riel
2014-05-06 13:26           ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-06 13:25         ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-06 20:20           ` Rik van Riel
2014-05-06 20:41             ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-07 12:17               ` Ingo Molnar
2014-05-06 11:56       ` Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140509020411.34adbd29@annuminas.surriel.com \
    --to=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=george.mccollister@gmail.com \
    --cc=ktkhai@parallels.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=morten.rasmussen@arm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®