From: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, morten.rasmussen@arm.com,
mingo@kernel.org, george.mccollister@gmail.com,
ktkhai@parallels.com
Subject: [PATCH] sched: clean up select_task_rq_fair conditionals and indentation
Date: Fri, 9 May 2014 02:04:11 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140509020411.34adbd29@annuminas.surriel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140509012743.67d4006d@annuminas.surriel.com>
This cleanup goes on top of the previous patch. We could also skip the
whole domain iteration if !want_affine, but that doesn't fit nicely in
80 columns and may have to be done in yet another patch (breaking that
bit of the code out into its own function?)
---8<---
Subject: sched: clean up select_task_rq_fair conditionals and indentation
The whole top half of select_task_rq_fair is only run if
sd_flag & SD_BALANCE_WAKE. The code should probably reflect
that.
Also remove the useless new_cpu = prev_cpu assignment, as the
value of new_cpu is not actually used.
Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
---
kernel/sched/fair.c | 47 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 5d33fb1b..844807b 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -4424,37 +4424,38 @@ select_task_rq_fair(struct task_struct *p, int prev_cpu, int sd_flag, int wake_f
if (p->nr_cpus_allowed == 1)
return prev_cpu;
+ rcu_read_lock();
if (sd_flag & SD_BALANCE_WAKE) {
if (cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, tsk_cpus_allowed(p)))
want_affine = 1;
- new_cpu = prev_cpu;
- }
- rcu_read_lock();
- for_each_domain(cpu, tmp) {
- if (!(tmp->flags & SD_LOAD_BALANCE))
- continue;
+ for_each_domain(cpu, tmp) {
+ if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, tsk_cpus_allowed(p)))
+ break;
- /*
- * If both cpu and prev_cpu are part of this domain,
- * cpu is a valid SD_WAKE_AFFINE target.
- */
- if (want_affine && (tmp->flags & SD_WAKE_AFFINE) &&
- cpumask_test_cpu(prev_cpu, sched_domain_span(tmp))) {
- affine_sd = tmp;
- break;
- }
+ if (!(tmp->flags & SD_LOAD_BALANCE))
+ continue;
- if (tmp->flags & sd_flag)
- sd = tmp;
- }
+ /*
+ * If both cpu and prev_cpu are part of this domain,
+ * cpu is a valid SD_WAKE_AFFINE target.
+ */
+ if (want_affine && (tmp->flags & SD_WAKE_AFFINE) &&
+ cpumask_test_cpu(prev_cpu,
+ sched_domain_span(tmp))) {
+ affine_sd = tmp;
+ break;
+ }
- if (affine_sd) {
- if (cpu != prev_cpu && wake_affine(affine_sd, p, sync))
- prev_cpu = cpu;
- }
+ if (tmp->flags & sd_flag)
+ sd = tmp;
+ }
+
+ if (affine_sd) {
+ if (cpu != prev_cpu && wake_affine(affine_sd, p, sync))
+ prev_cpu = cpu;
+ }
- if (sd_flag & SD_BALANCE_WAKE) {
new_cpu = select_idle_sibling(p, prev_cpu);
goto unlock;
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-09 6:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-02 4:42 [PATCH RFC/TEST] sched: make sync affine wakeups work Rik van Riel
2014-05-02 5:32 ` Mike Galbraith
2014-05-02 5:41 ` Mike Galbraith
2014-05-02 5:58 ` Mike Galbraith
2014-05-02 6:08 ` Rik van Riel
2014-05-02 6:36 ` Mike Galbraith
2014-05-02 6:51 ` Mike Galbraith
2014-05-02 6:13 ` Mike Galbraith
2014-05-02 6:30 ` Rik van Riel
2014-05-02 7:37 ` Mike Galbraith
2014-05-02 10:56 ` Rik van Riel
2014-05-02 11:27 ` Mike Galbraith
2014-05-02 12:51 ` Mike Galbraith
[not found] ` <5363B793.9010208@redhat.com>
2014-05-06 11:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-06 20:19 ` Rik van Riel
2014-05-06 20:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-06 23:46 ` Rik van Riel
2014-05-09 2:20 ` Rik van Riel
2014-05-09 5:27 ` [PATCH] sched: wake up task on prev_cpu if not in SD_WAKE_AFFINE domain with cpu Rik van Riel
2014-05-09 6:04 ` Rik van Riel [this message]
2014-05-09 7:34 ` Mike Galbraith
2014-05-09 14:22 ` Rik van Riel
2014-05-09 15:24 ` Mike Galbraith
2014-05-09 15:24 ` Rik van Riel
2014-05-09 17:55 ` Mike Galbraith
2014-05-09 18:16 ` Rik van Riel
2014-05-10 3:54 ` Mike Galbraith
2014-05-13 14:08 ` Rik van Riel
2014-05-14 4:08 ` Mike Galbraith
2014-05-14 15:40 ` [PATCH] sched: call select_idle_sibling when not affine_sd Rik van Riel
2014-05-14 15:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-19 13:08 ` [tip:sched/core] " tip-bot for Rik van Riel
2014-05-22 12:27 ` [tip:sched/core] sched: Call select_idle_sibling() " tip-bot for Rik van Riel
2014-05-04 11:44 ` [PATCH RFC/TEST] sched: make sync affine wakeups work Preeti Murthy
2014-05-04 12:04 ` Mike Galbraith
2014-05-05 4:38 ` Preeti U Murthy
2014-05-04 12:41 ` Rik van Riel
2014-05-05 4:50 ` Preeti U Murthy
2014-05-05 6:43 ` Preeti U Murthy
2014-05-05 11:28 ` Rik van Riel
2014-05-06 13:26 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-06 13:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-06 20:20 ` Rik van Riel
2014-05-06 20:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-07 12:17 ` Ingo Molnar
2014-05-06 11:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140509020411.34adbd29@annuminas.surriel.com \
--to=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=george.mccollister@gmail.com \
--cc=ktkhai@parallels.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=morten.rasmussen@arm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®