mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "George Spelvin" <linux@horizon.com>
To: linux@horizon.com, tytso@mit.edu
Cc: hpa@linux.intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	mingo@kernel.org, price@mit.edu
Subject: drivers/char/random.c: more ruminations
Date: 9 Jun 2014 20:20:57 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140610002057.21845.qmail@ns.horizon.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140609155046.GA8993@thunk.org>

My original reason for writing turned into a never mind...

I came up with a clever and intricate algorithm for preventing
a bulk writer from DoSing add_interrupt_randomness via the proposed
additional locking on the input_pool.

Then I re-checked the code and saw that only the (trusted) RNDADDENTROPY
call is allowed to write to the input_pool.  A plain write(2) is copied
to the two output pools.

And writing to the input_pool can never try to take a lock on an
output pool; spilling is done in a workqueue.


I'm getting to a dangerous place: I think I'm starting to understand this.
I should probably turn that into a doc patch.


I have an idea for a patch to change _xfer_secondary_pool
to use extract_buf rather than extract_entropy; is all that
FIPS stuff needed for purely internal transfers?


Also, shouldn't the r->last_pulled holdoff in xfer_secondary_pool be
really limited to actual transfers?  I.e. reorder the conditions as:

static void xfer_secondary_pool(struct entropy_store *r, size_t nbytes)
{
	if (!r->pull ||
	    r->entropy_count >= (nbytes << (ENTROPY_SHIFT + 3)) ||
	    r->entropy_count >= r->poolinfo->poolfracbits)
		return;

	if (r->limit == 0 && random_min_urandom_seed) {
		unsigned long now = jiffies;

		if (time_before(now,
				r->last_pulled + random_min_urandom_seed * HZ))
			return;
		r->last_pulled = now;
	}
	_xfer_secondary_pool(r, nbytes);
}

  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-06-10  0:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-06-09  0:05 [RFC PATCH] drivers/char/random.c: Is reducing locking range like this safe? George Spelvin
2014-06-09  1:35 ` Theodore Ts'o
2014-06-09  2:10   ` George Spelvin
2014-06-09  2:18     ` George Spelvin
2014-06-09  4:03       ` George Spelvin
2014-06-09  9:23         ` George Spelvin
2014-06-09 13:34         ` Theodore Ts'o
2014-06-09 15:04           ` George Spelvin
2014-06-09 15:50             ` Theodore Ts'o
2014-06-09 16:11               ` George Spelvin
2014-06-10  0:20               ` George Spelvin [this message]
2014-06-10  1:20                 ` drivers/char/random.c: more ruminations Theodore Ts'o
2014-06-10  3:10                   ` George Spelvin
2014-06-10 15:25                     ` Theodore Ts'o
2014-06-10 20:40                       ` George Spelvin
2014-06-10 21:20                         ` Theodore Ts'o
2014-06-11  0:10                           ` George Spelvin
2014-06-11  2:08                             ` Theodore Ts'o
2014-06-11  3:58                               ` George Spelvin
2014-06-11 13:11                                 ` Theodore Ts'o
2014-06-12  0:42                                   ` George Spelvin
2014-06-12  1:03                                   ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-06-11  4:34                               ` George Spelvin
2014-06-11 13:09                                 ` Theodore Ts'o
2014-06-11  2:21                             ` Theodore Ts'o
2014-06-09 13:17   ` drivers/char/random.c: More futzing about George Spelvin
2014-06-11 16:38     ` Theodore Ts'o
2014-06-11 16:48       ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-06-11 19:25         ` Theodore Ts'o
2014-06-11 20:41           ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-06-12  0:44             ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-06-12  1:51               ` George Spelvin
2014-06-12  0:32       ` George Spelvin
2014-06-12  3:22         ` Theodore Ts'o
2014-06-12  4:13           ` random: Benchamrking fast_mix2 George Spelvin
2014-06-12 11:18             ` George Spelvin
2014-06-12 20:17               ` Theodore Ts'o
2014-06-12 20:46               ` Theodore Ts'o
2014-06-13  0:23                 ` George Spelvin
2014-06-13 15:52                   ` Theodore Ts'o
2014-06-14  2:10                     ` George Spelvin
2014-06-14  3:06                       ` Theodore Ts'o
2014-06-14  5:25                         ` George Spelvin
2014-06-14  6:24                           ` Theodore Ts'o
2014-06-14  8:03                             ` George Spelvin
2014-06-14 11:14                               ` George Spelvin
2014-06-14 15:13                                 ` George Spelvin
2014-06-14 16:33                                   ` Theodore Ts'o
2014-06-15  0:23                                     ` George Spelvin
2014-06-15  1:17                                       ` Theodore Ts'o
2014-06-15  6:58                                         ` George Spelvin
2014-06-15 13:01                                           ` Theodore Ts'o
2014-06-14  6:27                           ` Theodore Ts'o
2014-06-14  4:55                     ` [RFC] random: is the IRQF_TIMER test working as intended? George Spelvin
2014-06-14  6:43                       ` Theodore Ts'o
2014-06-14  7:23                         ` George Spelvin
2014-06-12  3:43       ` drivers/char/random.c: More futzing about George Spelvin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140610002057.21845.qmail@ns.horizon.com \
    --to=linux@horizon.com \
    --cc=hpa@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=price@mit.edu \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®