From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
Cc: "Vinod Koul" <vinod.koul@intel.com>,
dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, lars@metafoo.de,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Laurent Pinchart" <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
"Antoine Ténart" <antoine@free-electrons.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/9] dmaengine: Create a generic dma_slave_caps callback
Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2014 10:25:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140927092536.GZ5182@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1411808085-27792-7-git-send-email-maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 10:54:42AM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> dma_slave_caps is very important to the generic layers that might interact with
> dmaengine, such as ASoC. Unfortunately, it has been added as yet another
> dma_device callback, and most of the existing drivers haven't implemented it,
> reducing its reliability.
Many haven't implemented it probably because either (a) they don't get used
with ASoC, or (b) they aren't aware of the new interface, or (c) can't be
bothered with the churn.
However, trying to return something introduces a bug:
> static inline int dma_get_slave_caps(struct dma_chan *chan, struct dma_slave_caps *caps)
> {
> + struct dma_device *device;
> +
> if (!chan || !caps)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> + device = chan->device;
> +
> /* check if the channel supports slave transactions */
> - if (!test_bit(DMA_SLAVE, chan->device->cap_mask.bits))
> + if (!test_bit(DMA_SLAVE, device->cap_mask.bits))
> return -ENXIO;
>
> - if (chan->device->device_slave_caps)
> - return chan->device->device_slave_caps(chan, caps);
> + caps->cmd_pause = !!device->device_pause;
> + caps->cmd_terminate = !!device->device_terminate_all;
> +
> + if (device->device_slave_caps)
> + return device->device_slave_caps(chan, caps);
>
> - return -ENXIO;
> + return 0;
So this now returns success if the driver doesn't implement device_slave_caps(),
but with most of the structure zero.
Now, consider what effect this has with:
ret = dma_get_slave_caps(chan, &dma_caps);
if (ret == 0) {
if (dma_caps.cmd_pause)
hw.info |= SNDRV_PCM_INFO_PAUSE | SNDRV_PCM_INFO_RESUME;
if (dma_caps.residue_granularity <= DMA_RESIDUE_GRANULARITY_SEGMENT)
hw.info |= SNDRV_PCM_INFO_BATCH;
if (substream->stream == SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_PLAYBACK)
addr_widths = dma_caps.dstn_addr_widths;
else
addr_widths = dma_caps.src_addr_widths;
}
addr_widths becomes zero, and we also get SNDRV_PCM_INFO_BATCH turned
on for _all_ DMA engine drivers. The first renders ASoC useless with
DMA engine.
It may be a good way to get people to implement it, but this will cause
regressions.
--
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.5Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-27 9:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-27 8:54 [PATCH 0/9] dmaengine: Implement generic slave capabilities retrieval Maxime Ripard
2014-09-27 8:54 ` [PATCH 1/9] dmaengine: Make the destination abbreviation coherent Maxime Ripard
2014-09-27 8:54 ` [PATCH 2/9] dmaengine: Make channel allocation callbacks optional Maxime Ripard
2014-09-28 16:07 ` Vinod Koul
2014-10-01 8:39 ` Maxime Ripard
2014-09-27 8:54 ` [PATCH 3/9] dmaengine: Introduce a device_config callback Maxime Ripard
2014-09-28 16:13 ` Vinod Koul
2014-09-28 16:14 ` Vinod Koul
2014-09-27 8:54 ` [PATCH 4/9] dmaengine: split out pause/resume operations from device_control Maxime Ripard
2014-09-27 8:54 ` [PATCH 5/9] dmaengine: Add device_terminate_all callback Maxime Ripard
2014-09-27 8:54 ` [PATCH 6/9] dmaengine: Create a generic dma_slave_caps callback Maxime Ripard
2014-09-27 9:25 ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2014-10-01 8:21 ` Maxime Ripard
2014-09-27 8:54 ` [PATCH 7/9] dmaengine: Move slave caps to dma_device Maxime Ripard
2014-09-27 9:28 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-10-01 8:27 ` Maxime Ripard
2014-10-01 8:55 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-09-27 8:54 ` [PATCH 8/9] dmaengine: Mark device_control as deprecated Maxime Ripard
2014-09-27 8:54 ` [PATCH 9/9] dmaengine: sun6i: Convert to generic slave_caps Maxime Ripard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140927092536.GZ5182@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=antoine@free-electrons.com \
--cc=dmaengine@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lars@metafoo.de \
--cc=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com \
--cc=vinod.koul@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®