* [for-next][PATCH 0/2] tracing: Minor fixes to the start up tests
@ 2014-10-09 1:10 Steven Rostedt
2014-10-09 1:10 ` [for-next][PATCH 1/2] tracing: Robustify wait loop Steven Rostedt
2014-10-09 1:10 ` [for-next][PATCH 2/2] tracing: Clean up scheduling in trace_wakeup_test_thread() Steven Rostedt
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Steven Rostedt @ 2014-10-09 1:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel; +Cc: Ingo Molnar, Andrew Morton
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rostedt/linux-trace.git
for-next
Head SHA1: 0cd8f5614fbf8a598a0a47526ac7dc42ab2ba8cd
Peter Zijlstra (1):
tracing: Robustify wait loop
Steven Rostedt (1):
tracing: Clean up scheduling in trace_wakeup_test_thread()
----
kernel/trace/trace_events.c | 5 ++++-
kernel/trace/trace_selftest.c | 47 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
2 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* [for-next][PATCH 1/2] tracing: Robustify wait loop 2014-10-09 1:10 [for-next][PATCH 0/2] tracing: Minor fixes to the start up tests Steven Rostedt @ 2014-10-09 1:10 ` Steven Rostedt 2014-10-09 1:10 ` [for-next][PATCH 2/2] tracing: Clean up scheduling in trace_wakeup_test_thread() Steven Rostedt 1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Steven Rostedt @ 2014-10-09 1:10 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-kernel Cc: Ingo Molnar, Andrew Morton, Fengguang Wu, Peter Zijlstra (Intel) [-- Attachment #1: 0001-tracing-Robustify-wait-loop.patch --] [-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1216 bytes --] From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> The pending nested sleep debugging triggered on the potential stale TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE in this code. While there, fix the loop such that we won't revert to a while(1) yield() 'spin' loop if we ever get a spurious wakeup. And fix the actual issue by properly terminating the 'wait' loop by setting TASK_RUNNING. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/p/20141008165110.GA14547@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net Reported-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> --- kernel/trace/trace_events.c | 5 ++++- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_events.c b/kernel/trace/trace_events.c index ef06ce7e9cf8..0cc51edde3a8 100644 --- a/kernel/trace/trace_events.c +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_events.c @@ -2513,8 +2513,11 @@ static __init int event_test_thread(void *unused) kfree(test_malloc); set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE); - while (!kthread_should_stop()) + while (!kthread_should_stop()) { schedule(); + set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE); + } + __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING); return 0; } -- 2.0.1 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [for-next][PATCH 2/2] tracing: Clean up scheduling in trace_wakeup_test_thread() 2014-10-09 1:10 [for-next][PATCH 0/2] tracing: Minor fixes to the start up tests Steven Rostedt 2014-10-09 1:10 ` [for-next][PATCH 1/2] tracing: Robustify wait loop Steven Rostedt @ 2014-10-09 1:10 ` Steven Rostedt 2014-10-09 9:39 ` Peter Zijlstra 1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Steven Rostedt @ 2014-10-09 1:10 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-kernel; +Cc: Ingo Molnar, Andrew Morton, Peter Zijlstra [-- Attachment #1: 0002-tracing-Clean-up-scheduling-in-trace_wakeup_test_thr.patch --] [-- Type: text/plain, Size: 3537 bytes --] From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Peter's new debugging tool triggers when tasks exit with !TASK_RUNNING. The code in trace_wakeup_test_thread() also has a single schedule() call that should be encompassed by a loop. This cleans up the code a little to make it a bit more robust and also makes the return exit properly with TASK_RUNNING. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/p/20141008135216.76142204@gandalf.local.home Reported-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> --- kernel/trace/trace_selftest.c | 47 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------- 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_selftest.c b/kernel/trace/trace_selftest.c index 5ef60499dc8e..593f52b73551 100644 --- a/kernel/trace/trace_selftest.c +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_selftest.c @@ -1025,6 +1025,12 @@ trace_selftest_startup_nop(struct tracer *trace, struct trace_array *tr) #endif #ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_TRACER + +struct wakeup_test_data { + struct completion is_ready; + int go; +}; + static int trace_wakeup_test_thread(void *data) { /* Make this a -deadline thread */ @@ -1034,51 +1040,56 @@ static int trace_wakeup_test_thread(void *data) .sched_deadline = 10000000ULL, .sched_period = 10000000ULL }; - struct completion *x = data; + struct wakeup_test_data *x = data; sched_setattr(current, &attr); /* Make it know we have a new prio */ - complete(x); + complete(&x->is_ready); /* now go to sleep and let the test wake us up */ set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE); - schedule(); + while (!x->go) { + schedule(); + set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE); + } - complete(x); + complete(&x->is_ready); + + set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE); /* we are awake, now wait to disappear */ while (!kthread_should_stop()) { - /* - * This will likely be the system top priority - * task, do short sleeps to let others run. - */ - msleep(100); + schedule(); + set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE); } + __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING); + return 0; } - int trace_selftest_startup_wakeup(struct tracer *trace, struct trace_array *tr) { unsigned long save_max = tr->max_latency; struct task_struct *p; - struct completion is_ready; + struct wakeup_test_data data; unsigned long count; int ret; - init_completion(&is_ready); + memset(&data, 0, sizeof(data)); + + init_completion(&data.is_ready); /* create a -deadline thread */ - p = kthread_run(trace_wakeup_test_thread, &is_ready, "ftrace-test"); + p = kthread_run(trace_wakeup_test_thread, &data, "ftrace-test"); if (IS_ERR(p)) { printk(KERN_CONT "Failed to create ftrace wakeup test thread "); return -1; } /* make sure the thread is running at -deadline policy */ - wait_for_completion(&is_ready); + wait_for_completion(&data.is_ready); /* start the tracing */ ret = tracer_init(trace, tr); @@ -1099,18 +1110,20 @@ trace_selftest_startup_wakeup(struct tracer *trace, struct trace_array *tr) msleep(100); } - init_completion(&is_ready); + init_completion(&data.is_ready); + + data.go = 1; + /* memory barrier is in the wake_up_process() */ wake_up_process(p); /* Wait for the task to wake up */ - wait_for_completion(&is_ready); + wait_for_completion(&data.is_ready); /* stop the tracing. */ tracing_stop(); /* check both trace buffers */ ret = trace_test_buffer(&tr->trace_buffer, NULL); - printk("ret = %d\n", ret); if (!ret) ret = trace_test_buffer(&tr->max_buffer, &count); -- 2.0.1 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [for-next][PATCH 2/2] tracing: Clean up scheduling in trace_wakeup_test_thread() 2014-10-09 1:10 ` [for-next][PATCH 2/2] tracing: Clean up scheduling in trace_wakeup_test_thread() Steven Rostedt @ 2014-10-09 9:39 ` Peter Zijlstra 0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Peter Zijlstra @ 2014-10-09 9:39 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Steven Rostedt; +Cc: linux-kernel, Ingo Molnar, Andrew Morton On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 09:10:12PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> > > Peter's new debugging tool triggers when tasks exit with !TASK_RUNNING. > The code in trace_wakeup_test_thread() also has a single schedule() call > that should be encompassed by a loop. > > This cleans up the code a little to make it a bit more robust and > also makes the return exit properly with TASK_RUNNING. > > Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/p/20141008135216.76142204@gandalf.local.home > > Reported-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> > Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infreadead.org> > --- > kernel/trace/trace_selftest.c | 47 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------- > 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_selftest.c b/kernel/trace/trace_selftest.c > index 5ef60499dc8e..593f52b73551 100644 > --- a/kernel/trace/trace_selftest.c > +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_selftest.c > @@ -1025,6 +1025,12 @@ trace_selftest_startup_nop(struct tracer *trace, struct trace_array *tr) > #endif > > #ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_TRACER > + > +struct wakeup_test_data { > + struct completion is_ready; > + int go; > +}; Yeah that works.. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-10-09 9:39 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2014-10-09 1:10 [for-next][PATCH 0/2] tracing: Minor fixes to the start up tests Steven Rostedt 2014-10-09 1:10 ` [for-next][PATCH 1/2] tracing: Robustify wait loop Steven Rostedt 2014-10-09 1:10 ` [for-next][PATCH 2/2] tracing: Clean up scheduling in trace_wakeup_test_thread() Steven Rostedt 2014-10-09 9:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome