* [PATCH] virtio-scsi: Fix the race condition in virtscsi_handle_event
@ 2015-01-05 6:04 Fam Zheng
2015-01-05 19:51 ` Venkatesh Srinivas
[not found] ` <CAHdzE-_QmNZVhmChHmy3FgRjJ692Apw2Va-SGoTz25s0fLjbvQ@mail.gmail.com>
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Fam Zheng @ 2015-01-05 6:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-scsi
Cc: James E.J. Bottomley, linux-kernel, Paolo Bonzini,
Christoph Hellwig, Michael S. Tsirkin
There is a race condition in virtscsi_handle_event, when many device
hotplug/unplug events flush in quickly.
The scsi_remove_device in virtscsi_handle_transport_reset may trigger
the BUG_ON in scsi_target_reap, because the state is altered behind it,
probably by scsi_scan_host of another event. I'm able to reproduce it by
repeatedly plugging and unplugging a scsi disk with the same lun number.
To make is safe, the mutex added in struct virtio_scsi is held in
virtscsi_handle_event, so that all the events are processed in a
synchronized way. With this lock, the panic goes away.
Signed-off-by: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>
---
drivers/scsi/virtio_scsi.c | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/virtio_scsi.c b/drivers/scsi/virtio_scsi.c
index c52bb5d..7f194d4 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/virtio_scsi.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/virtio_scsi.c
@@ -110,6 +110,9 @@ struct virtio_scsi {
/* CPU hotplug notifier */
struct notifier_block nb;
+ /* Protect the hotplug/unplug event handling */
+ struct mutex scan_lock;
+
/* Protected by event_vq lock */
bool stop_events;
@@ -377,6 +380,7 @@ static void virtscsi_handle_event(struct work_struct *work)
struct virtio_scsi *vscsi = event_node->vscsi;
struct virtio_scsi_event *event = &event_node->event;
+ mutex_lock(&vscsi->scan_lock);
if (event->event &
cpu_to_virtio32(vscsi->vdev, VIRTIO_SCSI_T_EVENTS_MISSED)) {
event->event &= ~cpu_to_virtio32(vscsi->vdev,
@@ -397,6 +401,7 @@ static void virtscsi_handle_event(struct work_struct *work)
pr_err("Unsupport virtio scsi event %x\n", event->event);
}
virtscsi_kick_event(vscsi, event_node);
+ mutex_unlock(&vscsi->scan_lock);
}
static void virtscsi_complete_event(struct virtio_scsi *vscsi, void *buf)
@@ -894,6 +899,7 @@ static int virtscsi_init(struct virtio_device *vdev,
const char **names;
struct virtqueue **vqs;
+ mutex_init(&vscsi->scan_lock);
num_vqs = vscsi->num_queues + VIRTIO_SCSI_VQ_BASE;
vqs = kmalloc(num_vqs * sizeof(struct virtqueue *), GFP_KERNEL);
callbacks = kmalloc(num_vqs * sizeof(vq_callback_t *), GFP_KERNEL);
--
1.9.3
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] virtio-scsi: Fix the race condition in virtscsi_handle_event 2015-01-05 6:04 [PATCH] virtio-scsi: Fix the race condition in virtscsi_handle_event Fam Zheng @ 2015-01-05 19:51 ` Venkatesh Srinivas [not found] ` <CAHdzE-_QmNZVhmChHmy3FgRjJ692Apw2Va-SGoTz25s0fLjbvQ@mail.gmail.com> 1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Venkatesh Srinivas @ 2015-01-05 19:51 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Fam Zheng Cc: linux-scsi, James E.J. Bottomley, Linux Kernel Developers List, Paolo Bonzini, Christoph Hellwig, Michael S. Tsirkin On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 10:04 PM, Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com> wrote: > > There is a race condition in virtscsi_handle_event, when many device > hotplug/unplug events flush in quickly. > > The scsi_remove_device in virtscsi_handle_transport_reset may trigger > the BUG_ON in scsi_target_reap, because the state is altered behind it, > probably by scsi_scan_host of another event. I'm able to reproduce it by > repeatedly plugging and unplugging a scsi disk with the same lun number. > > To make is safe, the mutex added in struct virtio_scsi is held in > virtscsi_handle_event, so that all the events are processed in a > synchronized way. With this lock, the panic goes away. > > Signed-off-by: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com> > --- > drivers/scsi/virtio_scsi.c | 6 ++++++ > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/virtio_scsi.c b/drivers/scsi/virtio_scsi.c > index c52bb5d..7f194d4 100644 > --- a/drivers/scsi/virtio_scsi.c > +++ b/drivers/scsi/virtio_scsi.c > @@ -110,6 +110,9 @@ struct virtio_scsi { > /* CPU hotplug notifier */ > struct notifier_block nb; > > + /* Protect the hotplug/unplug event handling */ > + struct mutex scan_lock; > + > /* Protected by event_vq lock */ > bool stop_events; > > @@ -377,6 +380,7 @@ static void virtscsi_handle_event(struct work_struct *work) > struct virtio_scsi *vscsi = event_node->vscsi; > struct virtio_scsi_event *event = &event_node->event; > > + mutex_lock(&vscsi->scan_lock); > if (event->event & > cpu_to_virtio32(vscsi->vdev, VIRTIO_SCSI_T_EVENTS_MISSED)) { > event->event &= ~cpu_to_virtio32(vscsi->vdev, > @@ -397,6 +401,7 @@ static void virtscsi_handle_event(struct work_struct *work) > pr_err("Unsupport virtio scsi event %x\n", event->event); > } > virtscsi_kick_event(vscsi, event_node); > + mutex_unlock(&vscsi->scan_lock); > } > > static void virtscsi_complete_event(struct virtio_scsi *vscsi, void *buf) > @@ -894,6 +899,7 @@ static int virtscsi_init(struct virtio_device *vdev, > const char **names; > struct virtqueue **vqs; > > + mutex_init(&vscsi->scan_lock); > num_vqs = vscsi->num_queues + VIRTIO_SCSI_VQ_BASE; > vqs = kmalloc(num_vqs * sizeof(struct virtqueue *), GFP_KERNEL); > callbacks = kmalloc(num_vqs * sizeof(vq_callback_t *), GFP_KERNEL); > -- > 1.9.3 Nice find. This fix does have the effect of serializing all event handling via scan_lock; perhaps you want to instead create a singlethreaded workqueue in virtio_scsi and queue handle_event there, rather than waiting on scan_lock on the system workqueue? Reviewed-by: Venkatesh Srinivas <venkateshs@google.com> -- vs; ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <CAHdzE-_QmNZVhmChHmy3FgRjJ692Apw2Va-SGoTz25s0fLjbvQ@mail.gmail.com>]
* Re: [PATCH] virtio-scsi: Fix the race condition in virtscsi_handle_event [not found] ` <CAHdzE-_QmNZVhmChHmy3FgRjJ692Apw2Va-SGoTz25s0fLjbvQ@mail.gmail.com> @ 2015-01-05 22:10 ` Michael S. Tsirkin 2015-01-06 3:57 ` Fam Zheng 2015-01-06 7:15 ` Michael S. Tsirkin 0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Michael S. Tsirkin @ 2015-01-05 22:10 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Venkatesh Srinivas Cc: Fam Zheng, linux-scsi, James E.J. Bottomley, Linux Kernel Developers List, Paolo Bonzini, Christoph Hellwig On Mon, Jan 05, 2015 at 11:48:47AM -0800, Venkatesh Srinivas wrote: > On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 10:04 PM, Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com> wrote: > > There is a race condition in virtscsi_handle_event, when many device > hotplug/unplug events flush in quickly. > > The scsi_remove_device in virtscsi_handle_transport_reset may trigger > the BUG_ON in scsi_target_reap, because the state is altered behind it, > probably by scsi_scan_host of another event. I'm able to reproduce it by > repeatedly plugging and unplugging a scsi disk with the same lun number. > > To make is safe, the mutex added in struct virtio_scsi is held in > virtscsi_handle_event, so that all the events are processed in a > synchronized way. With this lock, the panic goes away. > > Signed-off-by: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com> > --- > drivers/scsi/virtio_scsi.c | 6 ++++++ > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/virtio_scsi.c b/drivers/scsi/virtio_scsi.c > index c52bb5d..7f194d4 100644 > --- a/drivers/scsi/virtio_scsi.c > +++ b/drivers/scsi/virtio_scsi.c > @@ -110,6 +110,9 @@ struct virtio_scsi { > /* CPU hotplug notifier */ > struct notifier_block nb; > > + /* Protect the hotplug/unplug event handling */ > + struct mutex scan_lock; > + > /* Protected by event_vq lock */ > bool stop_events; > > @@ -377,6 +380,7 @@ static void virtscsi_handle_event(struct work_struct > *work) > struct virtio_scsi *vscsi = event_node->vscsi; > struct virtio_scsi_event *event = &event_node->event; > > + mutex_lock(&vscsi->scan_lock); > if (event->event & > cpu_to_virtio32(vscsi->vdev, VIRTIO_SCSI_T_EVENTS_MISSED)) { > event->event &= ~cpu_to_virtio32(vscsi->vdev, > @@ -397,6 +401,7 @@ static void virtscsi_handle_event(struct work_struct > *work) > pr_err("Unsupport virtio scsi event %x\n", event->event); > } > virtscsi_kick_event(vscsi, event_node); > + mutex_unlock(&vscsi->scan_lock); > } > > static void virtscsi_complete_event(struct virtio_scsi *vscsi, void *buf) > @@ -894,6 +899,7 @@ static int virtscsi_init(struct virtio_device *vdev, > const char **names; > struct virtqueue **vqs; > > + mutex_init(&vscsi->scan_lock); > num_vqs = vscsi->num_queues + VIRTIO_SCSI_VQ_BASE; > vqs = kmalloc(num_vqs * sizeof(struct virtqueue *), GFP_KERNEL); > callbacks = kmalloc(num_vqs * sizeof(vq_callback_t *), GFP_KERNEL); > -- > 1.9.3 > > > Nice find. > > This fix does have the effect of serializing all event handling via scan_lock; > perhaps you want to instead create a singlethreaded workqueue in virtio_scsi > and queue handle_event there, rather than waiting on scan_lock on the system > workqueue? Or use the system single-threaded wq. > Reviewed-by: Venkatesh Srinivas <venkateshs@google.com> > > -- vs; ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] virtio-scsi: Fix the race condition in virtscsi_handle_event 2015-01-05 22:10 ` Michael S. Tsirkin @ 2015-01-06 3:57 ` Fam Zheng 2015-01-06 7:15 ` Michael S. Tsirkin 1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Fam Zheng @ 2015-01-06 3:57 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Michael S. Tsirkin Cc: Venkatesh Srinivas, linux-scsi, James E.J. Bottomley, Linux Kernel Developers List, Paolo Bonzini, Christoph Hellwig On Tue, 01/06 00:10, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Mon, Jan 05, 2015 at 11:48:47AM -0800, Venkatesh Srinivas wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 10:04 PM, Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > There is a race condition in virtscsi_handle_event, when many device > > hotplug/unplug events flush in quickly. > > > > The scsi_remove_device in virtscsi_handle_transport_reset may trigger > > the BUG_ON in scsi_target_reap, because the state is altered behind it, > > probably by scsi_scan_host of another event. I'm able to reproduce it by > > repeatedly plugging and unplugging a scsi disk with the same lun number. > > > > To make is safe, the mutex added in struct virtio_scsi is held in > > virtscsi_handle_event, so that all the events are processed in a > > synchronized way. With this lock, the panic goes away. > > > > Signed-off-by: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com> > > --- > > drivers/scsi/virtio_scsi.c | 6 ++++++ > > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/virtio_scsi.c b/drivers/scsi/virtio_scsi.c > > index c52bb5d..7f194d4 100644 > > --- a/drivers/scsi/virtio_scsi.c > > +++ b/drivers/scsi/virtio_scsi.c > > @@ -110,6 +110,9 @@ struct virtio_scsi { > > /* CPU hotplug notifier */ > > struct notifier_block nb; > > > > + /* Protect the hotplug/unplug event handling */ > > + struct mutex scan_lock; > > + > > /* Protected by event_vq lock */ > > bool stop_events; > > > > @@ -377,6 +380,7 @@ static void virtscsi_handle_event(struct work_struct > > *work) > > struct virtio_scsi *vscsi = event_node->vscsi; > > struct virtio_scsi_event *event = &event_node->event; > > > > + mutex_lock(&vscsi->scan_lock); > > if (event->event & > > cpu_to_virtio32(vscsi->vdev, VIRTIO_SCSI_T_EVENTS_MISSED)) { > > event->event &= ~cpu_to_virtio32(vscsi->vdev, > > @@ -397,6 +401,7 @@ static void virtscsi_handle_event(struct work_struct > > *work) > > pr_err("Unsupport virtio scsi event %x\n", event->event); > > } > > virtscsi_kick_event(vscsi, event_node); > > + mutex_unlock(&vscsi->scan_lock); > > } > > > > static void virtscsi_complete_event(struct virtio_scsi *vscsi, void *buf) > > @@ -894,6 +899,7 @@ static int virtscsi_init(struct virtio_device *vdev, > > const char **names; > > struct virtqueue **vqs; > > > > + mutex_init(&vscsi->scan_lock); > > num_vqs = vscsi->num_queues + VIRTIO_SCSI_VQ_BASE; > > vqs = kmalloc(num_vqs * sizeof(struct virtqueue *), GFP_KERNEL); > > callbacks = kmalloc(num_vqs * sizeof(vq_callback_t *), GFP_KERNEL); > > -- > > 1.9.3 > > > > > > Nice find. > > > > This fix does have the effect of serializing all event handling via scan_lock; > > perhaps you want to instead create a singlethreaded workqueue in virtio_scsi > > and queue handle_event there, rather than waiting on scan_lock on the system > > workqueue? > > Or use the system single-threaded wq. Good idea, I'll change to that. Thanks, Fam > > > > Reviewed-by: Venkatesh Srinivas <venkateshs@google.com> > > > > -- vs; ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] virtio-scsi: Fix the race condition in virtscsi_handle_event 2015-01-05 22:10 ` Michael S. Tsirkin 2015-01-06 3:57 ` Fam Zheng @ 2015-01-06 7:15 ` Michael S. Tsirkin 1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Michael S. Tsirkin @ 2015-01-06 7:15 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Venkatesh Srinivas Cc: Fam Zheng, linux-scsi, James E.J. Bottomley, Linux Kernel Developers List, Paolo Bonzini, Christoph Hellwig On Tue, Jan 06, 2015 at 12:10:59AM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Mon, Jan 05, 2015 at 11:48:47AM -0800, Venkatesh Srinivas wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 10:04 PM, Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > There is a race condition in virtscsi_handle_event, when many device > > hotplug/unplug events flush in quickly. > > > > The scsi_remove_device in virtscsi_handle_transport_reset may trigger > > the BUG_ON in scsi_target_reap, because the state is altered behind it, > > probably by scsi_scan_host of another event. I'm able to reproduce it by > > repeatedly plugging and unplugging a scsi disk with the same lun number. > > > > To make is safe, the mutex added in struct virtio_scsi is held in > > virtscsi_handle_event, so that all the events are processed in a > > synchronized way. With this lock, the panic goes away. > > > > Signed-off-by: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com> > > --- > > drivers/scsi/virtio_scsi.c | 6 ++++++ > > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/virtio_scsi.c b/drivers/scsi/virtio_scsi.c > > index c52bb5d..7f194d4 100644 > > --- a/drivers/scsi/virtio_scsi.c > > +++ b/drivers/scsi/virtio_scsi.c > > @@ -110,6 +110,9 @@ struct virtio_scsi { > > /* CPU hotplug notifier */ > > struct notifier_block nb; > > > > + /* Protect the hotplug/unplug event handling */ > > + struct mutex scan_lock; > > + > > /* Protected by event_vq lock */ > > bool stop_events; > > > > @@ -377,6 +380,7 @@ static void virtscsi_handle_event(struct work_struct > > *work) > > struct virtio_scsi *vscsi = event_node->vscsi; > > struct virtio_scsi_event *event = &event_node->event; > > > > + mutex_lock(&vscsi->scan_lock); > > if (event->event & > > cpu_to_virtio32(vscsi->vdev, VIRTIO_SCSI_T_EVENTS_MISSED)) { > > event->event &= ~cpu_to_virtio32(vscsi->vdev, > > @@ -397,6 +401,7 @@ static void virtscsi_handle_event(struct work_struct > > *work) > > pr_err("Unsupport virtio scsi event %x\n", event->event); > > } > > virtscsi_kick_event(vscsi, event_node); > > + mutex_unlock(&vscsi->scan_lock); > > } > > > > static void virtscsi_complete_event(struct virtio_scsi *vscsi, void *buf) > > @@ -894,6 +899,7 @@ static int virtscsi_init(struct virtio_device *vdev, > > const char **names; > > struct virtqueue **vqs; > > > > + mutex_init(&vscsi->scan_lock); > > num_vqs = vscsi->num_queues + VIRTIO_SCSI_VQ_BASE; > > vqs = kmalloc(num_vqs * sizeof(struct virtqueue *), GFP_KERNEL); > > callbacks = kmalloc(num_vqs * sizeof(vq_callback_t *), GFP_KERNEL); > > -- > > 1.9.3 > > > > > > Nice find. > > > > This fix does have the effect of serializing all event handling via scan_lock; > > perhaps you want to instead create a singlethreaded workqueue in virtio_scsi > > and queue handle_event there, rather than waiting on scan_lock on the system > > workqueue? > > Or use the system single-threaded wq. I was sure we have one, but apparently not :( Pls ignore the comment, sorry about the noise. > > > Reviewed-by: Venkatesh Srinivas <venkateshs@google.com> > > > > -- vs; ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-01-06 7:16 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-01-05 6:04 [PATCH] virtio-scsi: Fix the race condition in virtscsi_handle_event Fam Zheng
2015-01-05 19:51 ` Venkatesh Srinivas
[not found] ` <CAHdzE-_QmNZVhmChHmy3FgRjJ692Apw2Va-SGoTz25s0fLjbvQ@mail.gmail.com>
2015-01-05 22:10 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2015-01-06 3:57 ` Fam Zheng
2015-01-06 7:15 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome