Re: [PATCH v5 0/5] Add Mediatek SoC Pinctrl/GPIO/EINT driver for MT8135.

Re: [PATCH v5 0/5] Add Mediatek SoC Pinctrl/GPIO/EINT driver for MT8135.

[Yingjoe Chen]

On Wed, 2015-01-21 at 13:28 +0800, Hongzhou Yang wrote:
> This is v5 of add Mediatek SoC Pinctrl/GPIO/EINT driver for MT8135.
> It is based on Joe.C' basic device tree support.
> See http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2014-October/296093.html

Hi,

A little correction.
I just talked to Hongzhou, this series is based on 3.19-rc1 instead of
my old patch. Sorry for the confusion.

Joe.C

Re: [PATCH v5 1/5] ARM: mediatek: Add config options for mediatek SoCs.

[Matthias Brugger]

2015-01-21 6:28 GMT+01:00 Hongzhou Yang <hongzhou.yang@mediatek.com>:
> From: Yingjoe Chen <yingjoe.chen@mediatek.com>
>
> The upcoming MTK pinctrl driver have a big pin table for each SoC
> and we don't want to bloat the kernel binary if we don't need it.
> Add config options so we can build for one SoC only.
>
> Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Yingjoe Chen <yingjoe.chen@mediatek.com>
> Signed-off-by: Hongzhou Yang <hongzhou.yang@mediatek.com>

Applied to v3.20-next/soc

> ---
>  arch/arm/mach-mediatek/Kconfig | 22 +++++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-mediatek/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-mediatek/Kconfig
> index f73f588..f7e463c 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-mediatek/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-mediatek/Kconfig
> @@ -1,6 +1,26 @@
> -config ARCH_MEDIATEK
> +menuconfig ARCH_MEDIATEK
>         bool "Mediatek MT65xx & MT81xx SoC" if ARCH_MULTI_V7
>         select ARM_GIC
>         select MTK_TIMER
>         help
>           Support for Mediatek MT65xx & MT81xx SoCs
> +
> +if ARCH_MEDIATEK
> +
> +config MACH_MT6589
> +       bool "MediaTek MT6589 SoCs support"
> +       default ARCH_MEDIATEK
> +
> +config MACH_MT6592
> +       bool "MediaTek MT6592 SoCs support"
> +       default ARCH_MEDIATEK
> +
> +config MACH_MT8127
> +       bool "MediaTek MT8127 SoCs support"
> +       default ARCH_MEDIATEK
> +
> +config MACH_MT8135
> +       bool "MediaTek MT8135 SoCs support"
> +       default ARCH_MEDIATEK
> +
> +endif
> --
> 1.8.1.1.dirty
>



-- 
motzblog.wordpress.com

Re: [PATCH v5 1/5] ARM: mediatek: Add config options for mediatek SoCs.

[Paul Bolle]

Joe,

On Thu, 2015-01-22 at 13:54 +0100, Matthias Brugger wrote:
> 2015-01-21 6:28 GMT+01:00 Hongzhou Yang <hongzhou.yang@mediatek.com>:
> > From: Yingjoe Chen <yingjoe.chen@mediatek.com>
> >
> > The upcoming MTK pinctrl driver have a big pin table for each SoC
> > and we don't want to bloat the kernel binary if we don't need it.
> > Add config options so we can build for one SoC only.
> >
> > Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Yingjoe Chen <yingjoe.chen@mediatek.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Hongzhou Yang <hongzhou.yang@mediatek.com>
> 
> Applied to v3.20-next/soc

This became commit ad8a221e1f49 ("ARM: mediatek: Add config options for
mediatek SoCs.") in today's linux-next (ie, next-20150127). I noticed
because a script I use to check linux-next spotted a problem with it.

> > ---
> >  arch/arm/mach-mediatek/Kconfig | 22 +++++++++++++++++++++-
> >  1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-mediatek/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-mediatek/Kconfig
> > index f73f588..f7e463c 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-mediatek/Kconfig
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-mediatek/Kconfig
> > @@ -1,6 +1,26 @@
> > -config ARCH_MEDIATEK
> > +menuconfig ARCH_MEDIATEK
> >         bool "Mediatek MT65xx & MT81xx SoC" if ARCH_MULTI_V7
> >         select ARM_GIC
> >         select MTK_TIMER
> >         help
> >           Support for Mediatek MT65xx & MT81xx SoCs
> > +
> > +if ARCH_MEDIATEK
> > +
> > +config MACH_MT6589
> > +       bool "MediaTek MT6589 SoCs support"
> > +       default ARCH_MEDIATEK
> > +
> > +config MACH_MT6592
> > +       bool "MediaTek MT6592 SoCs support"
> > +       default ARCH_MEDIATEK
> > +
> > +config MACH_MT8127
> > +       bool "MediaTek MT8127 SoCs support"
> > +       default ARCH_MEDIATEK
> > +
> > +config MACH_MT8135
> > +       bool "MediaTek MT8135 SoCs support"
> > +       default ARCH_MEDIATEK
> > +
> > +endif

None of these four new MACH_MT* Kconfig symbols are currently used in
linux-next. I assume that patches that actually use them (either as a
Kconfig symbol or as a CONFIG_* macro) are still pending. Is that
correct?

Thanks,


Paul Bolle

Re: [PATCH v5 1/5] ARM: mediatek: Add config options for mediatek SoCs.

[Yingjoe Chen]

Hi,

On Tue, 2015-01-27 at 11:16 +0100, Paul Bolle wrote:
> Joe,
> 
> On Thu, 2015-01-22 at 13:54 +0100, Matthias Brugger wrote:
> > 2015-01-21 6:28 GMT+01:00 Hongzhou Yang <hongzhou.yang@mediatek.com>:
> > > From: Yingjoe Chen <yingjoe.chen@mediatek.com>
> > >
> > > The upcoming MTK pinctrl driver have a big pin table for each SoC
> > > and we don't want to bloat the kernel binary if we don't need it.
> > > Add config options so we can build for one SoC only.
> > >
> > > Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
> > > Signed-off-by: Yingjoe Chen <yingjoe.chen@mediatek.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Hongzhou Yang <hongzhou.yang@mediatek.com>
> > 
> > Applied to v3.20-next/soc
> 
> This became commit ad8a221e1f49 ("ARM: mediatek: Add config options for
> mediatek SoCs.") in today's linux-next (ie, next-20150127). I noticed
> because a script I use to check linux-next spotted a problem with it.
> 
> > > ---
> > >  arch/arm/mach-mediatek/Kconfig | 22 +++++++++++++++++++++-
> > >  1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-mediatek/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-mediatek/Kconfig
> > > index f73f588..f7e463c 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm/mach-mediatek/Kconfig
> > > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-mediatek/Kconfig
> > > @@ -1,6 +1,26 @@
> > > -config ARCH_MEDIATEK
> > > +menuconfig ARCH_MEDIATEK
> > >         bool "Mediatek MT65xx & MT81xx SoC" if ARCH_MULTI_V7
> > >         select ARM_GIC
> > >         select MTK_TIMER
> > >         help
> > >           Support for Mediatek MT65xx & MT81xx SoCs
> > > +
> > > +if ARCH_MEDIATEK
> > > +
> > > +config MACH_MT6589
> > > +       bool "MediaTek MT6589 SoCs support"
> > > +       default ARCH_MEDIATEK
> > > +
> > > +config MACH_MT6592
> > > +       bool "MediaTek MT6592 SoCs support"
> > > +       default ARCH_MEDIATEK
> > > +
> > > +config MACH_MT8127
> > > +       bool "MediaTek MT8127 SoCs support"
> > > +       default ARCH_MEDIATEK
> > > +
> > > +config MACH_MT8135
> > > +       bool "MediaTek MT8135 SoCs support"
> > > +       default ARCH_MEDIATEK
> > > +
> > > +endif
> 
> None of these four new MACH_MT* Kconfig symbols are currently used in
> linux-next. I assume that patches that actually use them (either as a
> Kconfig symbol or as a CONFIG_* macro) are still pending. Is that
> correct?

Yes, it is used in patch 3 in this series[1], and is discussed in [2].

Joe.C

[1]
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-January/318453.html
[2]
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-January/315616.html

Re: [PATCH v5 1/5] ARM: mediatek: Add config options for mediatek SoCs.

[Paul Bolle]

Hi Joe,

On Tue, 2015-01-27 at 18:26 +0800, Yingjoe Chen wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-01-27 at 11:16 +0100, Paul Bolle wrote:
> > On Thu, 2015-01-22 at 13:54 +0100, Matthias Brugger wrote:
> > > 2015-01-21 6:28 GMT+01:00 Hongzhou Yang <hongzhou.yang@mediatek.com>:
> > > > From: Yingjoe Chen <yingjoe.chen@mediatek.com>
> > > >
> > > > The upcoming MTK pinctrl driver have a big pin table for each SoC
> > > > and we don't want to bloat the kernel binary if we don't need it.
> > > > Add config options so we can build for one SoC only.
> > > >
> > > > Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Yingjoe Chen <yingjoe.chen@mediatek.com>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Hongzhou Yang <hongzhou.yang@mediatek.com>
> > > 
> > > Applied to v3.20-next/soc
> > 
> > This became commit ad8a221e1f49 ("ARM: mediatek: Add config options for
> > mediatek SoCs.") in today's linux-next (ie, next-20150127). I noticed
> > because a script I use to check linux-next spotted a problem with it.
> > 
> > > > ---
> > > >  arch/arm/mach-mediatek/Kconfig | 22 +++++++++++++++++++++-
> > > >  1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-mediatek/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-mediatek/Kconfig
> > > > index f73f588..f7e463c 100644
> > > > --- a/arch/arm/mach-mediatek/Kconfig
> > > > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-mediatek/Kconfig
> > > > @@ -1,6 +1,26 @@
> > > > -config ARCH_MEDIATEK
> > > > +menuconfig ARCH_MEDIATEK
> > > >         bool "Mediatek MT65xx & MT81xx SoC" if ARCH_MULTI_V7
> > > >         select ARM_GIC
> > > >         select MTK_TIMER
> > > >         help
> > > >           Support for Mediatek MT65xx & MT81xx SoCs
> > > > +
> > > > +if ARCH_MEDIATEK
> > > > +
> > > > +config MACH_MT6589
> > > > +       bool "MediaTek MT6589 SoCs support"
> > > > +       default ARCH_MEDIATEK
> > > > +
> > > > +config MACH_MT6592
> > > > +       bool "MediaTek MT6592 SoCs support"
> > > > +       default ARCH_MEDIATEK
> > > > +
> > > > +config MACH_MT8127
> > > > +       bool "MediaTek MT8127 SoCs support"
> > > > +       default ARCH_MEDIATEK
> > > > +
> > > > +config MACH_MT8135
> > > > +       bool "MediaTek MT8135 SoCs support"
> > > > +       default ARCH_MEDIATEK
> > > > +
> > > > +endif
> > 
> > None of these four new MACH_MT* Kconfig symbols are currently used in
> > linux-next. I assume that patches that actually use them (either as a
> > Kconfig symbol or as a CONFIG_* macro) are still pending. Is that
> > correct?
> 
> Yes, it is used in patch 3 in this series[1], and is discussed in [2].
> 
> Joe.C
> 
> [1]
> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-January/318453.html

That only seems to add a user for MACH_MT8135, not for the other three
symbols. The other three symbols will be used too, won't they?

> [2]
> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-January/315616.html

(For the record, that is a message regarding v4 of this patch.)


Paul Bolle

Re: [PATCH v5 1/5] ARM: mediatek: Add config options for mediatek SoCs.

[Matthias Brugger]

2015-01-27 11:34 GMT+01:00 Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl>:
> Hi Joe,
>
> On Tue, 2015-01-27 at 18:26 +0800, Yingjoe Chen wrote:
>> On Tue, 2015-01-27 at 11:16 +0100, Paul Bolle wrote:
>> > On Thu, 2015-01-22 at 13:54 +0100, Matthias Brugger wrote:
>> > > 2015-01-21 6:28 GMT+01:00 Hongzhou Yang <hongzhou.yang@mediatek.com>:
>> > > > From: Yingjoe Chen <yingjoe.chen@mediatek.com>
>> > > >
>> > > > The upcoming MTK pinctrl driver have a big pin table for each SoC
>> > > > and we don't want to bloat the kernel binary if we don't need it.
>> > > > Add config options so we can build for one SoC only.
>> > > >
>> > > > Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
>> > > > Signed-off-by: Yingjoe Chen <yingjoe.chen@mediatek.com>
>> > > > Signed-off-by: Hongzhou Yang <hongzhou.yang@mediatek.com>
>> > >
>> > > Applied to v3.20-next/soc
>> >
>> > This became commit ad8a221e1f49 ("ARM: mediatek: Add config options for
>> > mediatek SoCs.") in today's linux-next (ie, next-20150127). I noticed
>> > because a script I use to check linux-next spotted a problem with it.
>> >
>> > > > ---
>> > > >  arch/arm/mach-mediatek/Kconfig | 22 +++++++++++++++++++++-
>> > > >  1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> > > >
>> > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-mediatek/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-mediatek/Kconfig
>> > > > index f73f588..f7e463c 100644
>> > > > --- a/arch/arm/mach-mediatek/Kconfig
>> > > > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-mediatek/Kconfig
>> > > > @@ -1,6 +1,26 @@
>> > > > -config ARCH_MEDIATEK
>> > > > +menuconfig ARCH_MEDIATEK
>> > > >         bool "Mediatek MT65xx & MT81xx SoC" if ARCH_MULTI_V7
>> > > >         select ARM_GIC
>> > > >         select MTK_TIMER
>> > > >         help
>> > > >           Support for Mediatek MT65xx & MT81xx SoCs
>> > > > +
>> > > > +if ARCH_MEDIATEK
>> > > > +
>> > > > +config MACH_MT6589
>> > > > +       bool "MediaTek MT6589 SoCs support"
>> > > > +       default ARCH_MEDIATEK
>> > > > +
>> > > > +config MACH_MT6592
>> > > > +       bool "MediaTek MT6592 SoCs support"
>> > > > +       default ARCH_MEDIATEK
>> > > > +
>> > > > +config MACH_MT8127
>> > > > +       bool "MediaTek MT8127 SoCs support"
>> > > > +       default ARCH_MEDIATEK
>> > > > +
>> > > > +config MACH_MT8135
>> > > > +       bool "MediaTek MT8135 SoCs support"
>> > > > +       default ARCH_MEDIATEK
>> > > > +
>> > > > +endif
>> >
>> > None of these four new MACH_MT* Kconfig symbols are currently used in
>> > linux-next. I assume that patches that actually use them (either as a
>> > Kconfig symbol or as a CONFIG_* macro) are still pending. Is that
>> > correct?
>>
>> Yes, it is used in patch 3 in this series[1], and is discussed in [2].
>>
>> Joe.C
>>
>> [1]
>> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-January/318453.html
>
> That only seems to add a user for MACH_MT8135, not for the other three
> symbols. The other three symbols will be used too, won't they?
>
>> [2]
>> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-January/315616.html
>
> (For the record, that is a message regarding v4 of this patch.)
>
>
> Paul Bolle
>

Yes, this symbols are needed when we implement the pinctrl driver for
the other platforms.
I will implement mt6589 as soon as the pinctrl driver got merged.
I suppose Howard will go for the mt6592.

Cheers,
Matthias

-- 
motzblog.wordpress.com

Re: [PATCH v5 1/5] ARM: mediatek: Add config options for mediatek SoCs.

[Paul Bolle]

Matthias,

On Tue, 2015-01-27 at 13:38 +0100, Matthias Brugger wrote:
> Yes, this symbols are needed when we implement the pinctrl driver for
> the other platforms.
> I will implement mt6589 as soon as the pinctrl driver got merged.
> I suppose Howard will go for the mt6592.

I see. Unless the users of MACH_MT6589, MACH_MT6592, MACH_MT8127, and
MACH_MT8135 take very long to land in linux-next (or in mainline) I
won't bother you again about this.

Thanks!


Paul Bolle

Re: [PATCH v5 2/5] dt-bindings: Add pinctrl bindings for mt65xx/mt81xx.

[Linus Walleij]

On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 6:28 AM, Hongzhou Yang
<hongzhou.yang@mediatek.com> wrote:

> From: Hongzhou Yang <hongzhou.yang@mediatek.com>
>
> Add devicetree bindings for Mediatek SoC pinctrl driver.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hongzhou Yang <hongzhou.yang@mediatek.com>

Sascha can you ACK this binding?
If you confirm it will cover also your usecase I'm gonna be happy
with this...

Yours,
Linus Walleij

Re: [PATCH v5 2/5] dt-bindings: Add pinctrl bindings for mt65xx/mt81xx.

[Sascha Hauer]

On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 03:19:01PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 6:28 AM, Hongzhou Yang
> <hongzhou.yang@mediatek.com> wrote:
> 
> > From: Hongzhou Yang <hongzhou.yang@mediatek.com>
> >
> > Add devicetree bindings for Mediatek SoC pinctrl driver.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Hongzhou Yang <hongzhou.yang@mediatek.com>
> 
> Sascha can you ACK this binding?

Just did that.

> If you confirm it will cover also your usecase I'm gonna be happy
> with this...

\o/

Sascha

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |

Re: [PATCH v5 2/5] dt-bindings: Add pinctrl bindings for mt65xx/mt81xx.

[Sascha Hauer]

On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 01:28:14PM +0800, Hongzhou Yang wrote:
> From: Hongzhou Yang <hongzhou.yang@mediatek.com>
> 
> Add devicetree bindings for Mediatek SoC pinctrl driver.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Hongzhou Yang <hongzhou.yang@mediatek.com>

This basically follows the pinmux binding I suggested as generic pinmux
binding for per-pin type controllers, so:

Acked-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>

Sascha


-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |

Re: [PATCH v5 2/5] dt-bindings: Add pinctrl bindings for mt65xx/mt81xx.

[Linus Walleij]

On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 1:28 PM, Hongzhou Yang
<hongzhou.yang@mediatek.com> wrote:

> From: Hongzhou Yang <hongzhou.yang@mediatek.com>
>
> Add devicetree bindings for Mediatek SoC pinctrl driver.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hongzhou Yang <hongzhou.yang@mediatek.com>

OK applied this patch for v3.21 now, relying on Sascha's ACK.

Yours,
Linus Walleij

Re: [PATCH v5 2/5] dt-bindings: Add pinctrl bindings for mt65xx/mt81xx.

[Matthias Brugger]

Hi Linus,

2015-02-10 9:01 GMT+01:00 Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>:
> On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 1:28 PM, Hongzhou Yang
> <hongzhou.yang@mediatek.com> wrote:
>
>> From: Hongzhou Yang <hongzhou.yang@mediatek.com>
>>
>> Add devicetree bindings for Mediatek SoC pinctrl driver.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Hongzhou Yang <hongzhou.yang@mediatek.com>
>
> OK applied this patch for v3.21 now, relying on Sascha's ACK.

I can see the the pinctrl driver parts in your tree repository [0],
but not in linux-next.
Do think of merging them in the next merge window?

Thanks,
Matthias

[0] https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/linusw/linux-pinctrl.git/log/?h=mtk-staging
>
> Yours,
> Linus Walleij



-- 
motzblog.wordpress.com

Re: [PATCH v5 2/5] dt-bindings: Add pinctrl bindings for mt65xx/mt81xx.

[Linus Walleij]

On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 9:16 AM, Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Linus,
>
> 2015-02-10 9:01 GMT+01:00 Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>:
>> On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 1:28 PM, Hongzhou Yang
>> <hongzhou.yang@mediatek.com> wrote:
>>
>>> From: Hongzhou Yang <hongzhou.yang@mediatek.com>
>>>
>>> Add devicetree bindings for Mediatek SoC pinctrl driver.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Hongzhou Yang <hongzhou.yang@mediatek.com>
>>
>> OK applied this patch for v3.21 now, relying on Sascha's ACK.
>
> I can see the the pinctrl driver parts in your tree repository [0],
> but not in linux-next.
> Do think of merging them in the next merge window?

Oops too stressed just forgot to merge them into my devel
branch.

Merged now. Will push from devel to for-next when the
zeroday builders say it all compiles.

Yours,
Linus Walleij

Re: [PATCH v5 5/5] ARM: dts: mt8135: Add pinctrl/GPIO/EINT node for mt8135.

[Linus Walleij]

On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 1:28 PM, Hongzhou Yang
<hongzhou.yang@mediatek.com> wrote:

> From: Hongzhou Yang <hongzhou.yang@mediatek.com>
>
> Add pinctrl,GPIO and EINT node to mt8135.dtsi.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hongzhou Yang <hongzhou.yang@mediatek.com>

Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

The pinctrl driver portions are merged to the pin control tree.

Yours,
Linus Walleij

Re: [PATCH v5 5/5] ARM: dts: mt8135: Add pinctrl/GPIO/EINT node for mt8135.

[Matthias Brugger]

2015-02-10 9:13 GMT+01:00 Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>:
> On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 1:28 PM, Hongzhou Yang
> <hongzhou.yang@mediatek.com> wrote:
>
>> From: Hongzhou Yang <hongzhou.yang@mediatek.com>
>>
>> Add pinctrl,GPIO and EINT node to mt8135.dtsi.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Hongzhou Yang <hongzhou.yang@mediatek.com>
>
> Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

merged to v4.0-next/dts

>
> The pinctrl driver portions are merged to the pin control tree.
>
> Yours,
> Linus Walleij



-- 
motzblog.wordpress.com

Re: [PATCH v5 3/5] ARM: mediatek: Add Pinctrl/GPIO driver for mt8135.

[Linus Walleij]

On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 1:28 PM, Hongzhou Yang
<hongzhou.yang@mediatek.com> wrote:

> From: Hongzhou Yang <hongzhou.yang@mediatek.com>
>
> The mediatek SoCs have GPIO controller that handle both the muxing and GPIOs.
>
> The GPIO controller have pinmux, pull enable, pull select, direction and output high/low control.
>
> This driver include common driver and mt8135 part.
> The common driver include the pinctrl driver and GPIO driver.
> The mt8135 part contain its special device data.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hongzhou Yang <hongzhou.yang@mediatek.com>

I have merged this patch for v3.21, except:

>  arch/arm/mach-mediatek/Kconfig                |    1 +
(...)
 --- a/arch/arm/mach-mediatek/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-mediatek/Kconfig
> @@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
>  menuconfig ARCH_MEDIATEK
>         bool "Mediatek MT65xx & MT81xx SoC" if ARCH_MULTI_V7
>         select ARM_GIC
> +       select PINCTRL
>         select MTK_TIMER
>         help
>           Support for Mediatek MT65xx & MT81xx SoCs

This, which should come in through the ARM SoC tree. It's not
dependent on this series anyway.

This will appear after the merge window as we start the v3.21 cycle.

Yours,
Linus Walleij

Re: [PATCH v5 3/5] ARM: mediatek: Add Pinctrl/GPIO driver for mt8135.

[Linus Walleij]

On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 4:42 PM, Hongzhou Yang
<hongzhou.yang@mediatek.com> wrote:

> Due to pinconf relate API changed at kernel-3.20, a build error
> happened.
> Do I need to send patch v6?

I discussed with your colleagues and I think it's simplest just to make
a small fix patch on top of what is found on the mtk-staging branch
and I'll apply it there.

Yours,
Linus Walleij

Re: [PATCH v5 4/5] ARM: mediatek: Add EINT support to MTK pinctrl driver.

[Linus Walleij]

On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 1:28 PM, Hongzhou Yang
<hongzhou.yang@mediatek.com> wrote:

> From: Maoguang Meng <maoguang.meng@mediatek.com>
>
> MTK SoC support external interrupt(EINT) from most SoC pins.
> Add EINT support to pinctrl driver.
>
> Signed-off-by: Maoguang Meng <maoguang.meng@mediatek.com>
> Signed-off-by: Hongzhou Yang <hongzhou.yang@mediatek.com>

Patch applied.

Yours,
Linus Walleij