From: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
To: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Andre Przywara <Andre.Przywara@arm.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFT v2] x86: move cacheinfo sysfs to generic cacheinfo infrastructure
Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2015 12:27:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150304112740.GB3663@pd.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54F6E965.4030301@arm.com>
On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 11:15:49AM +0000, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> I can do that, but wouldn't that add confusion as this commit is not
> changing that behaviour. It's already changed in v4.0-rc1
Nah, this would add a reference to the fact that the cpumask format is
not really a stable thing and thus cannot be considered a userpsace
regression. And having this info is important IMO in case someone is
wondering in the future.
In general, having more and even redundant info in the commit messages
is much better than having less info. I can't count the times I've been
staring at a one-liner commit message and trying to rhyme up what was
the purpose of doing it this way.
So more is more, in this case. :-)
Thanks.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
--
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-04 11:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-08 7:50 [PATCH RFT] " Sudeep Holla
2015-01-23 13:55 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-01-23 18:15 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-02-23 16:36 ` Sudeep Holla
2015-02-23 18:14 ` [PATCH RFT v2] " Sudeep Holla
2015-02-24 7:58 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-02-24 9:30 ` Sudeep Holla
2015-02-24 17:57 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-02-24 18:09 ` Sudeep Holla
2015-02-24 18:58 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-03-01 22:39 ` Andre Przywara
2015-03-02 10:17 ` Sudeep Holla
2015-03-03 18:45 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-03-03 18:53 ` Tejun Heo
2015-03-03 18:57 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-03-04 11:15 ` Sudeep Holla
2015-03-04 11:27 ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2015-03-04 11:35 ` Sudeep Holla
2015-03-04 9:52 ` Sudeep Holla
2015-03-04 12:00 ` [PATCH v3] " Sudeep Holla
2015-03-04 12:27 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-03-05 8:16 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-03-05 9:28 ` Sudeep Holla
2015-03-10 11:37 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-03-10 11:53 ` Sudeep Holla
2015-03-10 14:22 ` Sudeep Holla
2015-03-10 14:26 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-03-10 14:35 ` Sudeep Holla
2015-03-11 13:36 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-03-11 15:44 ` Sudeep Holla
2015-03-11 20:23 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-03-09 14:46 ` [tip:x86/cpu] x86/cacheinfo: Move cacheinfo sysfs code to generic infrastructure tip-bot for Sudeep Holla
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150304112740.GB3663@pd.tnic \
--to=bp@suse.de \
--cc=Andre.Przywara@arm.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®