From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@kernel.org,
laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com,
josh@joshtriplett.org, tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org,
dhowells@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com, dvhart@linux.intel.com,
fweisbec@gmail.com, oleg@redhat.com, bobby.prani@gmail.com,
Patrick Marlier <patrick.marlier@gmail.com>,
wangyun@linux.vnet.ibm.com, neilb@suse.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 3/4] md/bitmap: Fix list_entry_rcu usage
Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 22:38:53 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150512223853.55e0ed90@grimm.local.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1431470787-4702-3-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On Tue, 12 May 2015 15:46:26 -0700
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> From: Patrick Marlier <patrick.marlier@gmail.com>
>
> Signed-off-by: Patrick Marlier <patrick.marlier@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> drivers/md/bitmap.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/md/bitmap.c b/drivers/md/bitmap.c
> index 2bc56e2a3526..32901772e4ee 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/bitmap.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/bitmap.c
> @@ -181,7 +181,7 @@ static struct md_rdev *next_active_rdev(struct md_rdev *rdev, struct mddev *mdde
> rcu_read_lock();
> if (rdev == NULL)
> /* start at the beginning */
> - rdev = list_entry_rcu(&mddev->disks, struct md_rdev, same_set);
> + rdev = list_entry_rcu(mddev->disks.next, struct md_rdev, same_set);
Hmm, this changes the semantics.
The original code looks nasty, I first thought it was broken, but it
seems to work out of sheer luck (or clever hack)
> else {
> /* release the previous rdev and start from there. */
> rdev_dec_pending(rdev, mddev);
What comes after this is:
list_for_each_entry_continue_rcu(rdev, &mddev->disks, same_set) {
if (rdev->raid_disk >= 0 &&
Now the original code had:
rdev = list_entry_rcu(&mddev->disks, struct md_rdev, same_set);
Where &mddev->disks would return the address of the disks field of
mddev which is a list head. Then it would get the 'same_set' offset,
which is 0, and rdev is pointing to a makeshift md_rdev struct. But it
isn't used, as the list_for_each_entry_continue_rcu() has:
#define list_for_each_entry_continue_rcu(pos, head, member) \
for (pos = list_entry_rcu(pos->member.next, typeof(*pos), member); \
&pos->member != (head); \
pos = list_entry_rcu(pos->member.next, typeof(*pos), member))
Thus the first use of pos is pos->member.next or:
mddev->disks.next
But now you converted it to rdev = mddev->disks.next, which means the
first use is:
pos = mddev->disks.next->next
I think you are skipping the first element here.
-- Steve
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-13 2:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-12 22:46 [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/4] RCU-protected list updates for 4.2 Paul E. McKenney
2015-05-12 22:46 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 1/4] rculist: Fix another sparse warning Paul E. McKenney
2015-05-12 22:46 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 2/4] rculist: Fix list_entry_rcu to read ptr with rcu_dereference_raw Paul E. McKenney
2015-05-12 22:46 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 3/4] md/bitmap: Fix list_entry_rcu usage Paul E. McKenney
2015-05-13 2:38 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2015-05-13 2:58 ` NeilBrown
2015-05-13 13:17 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-05-16 17:42 ` Patrick Marlier
2015-05-18 2:06 ` NeilBrown
2015-05-18 13:43 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-05-19 22:07 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-05-20 5:09 ` NeilBrown
2015-05-20 13:28 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-05-21 0:07 ` NeilBrown
2015-09-11 23:05 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-09-13 10:06 ` Patrick Marlier
2015-09-13 16:10 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-09-22 20:50 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-09-23 17:57 ` Patrick Marlier
2015-09-24 4:45 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-05-18 13:53 ` Patrick Marlier
2015-05-18 19:36 ` Patrick Marlier
2015-05-12 22:46 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 4/4] netfilter: " Paul E. McKenney
2015-05-13 2:42 ` Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150512223853.55e0ed90@grimm.local.home \
--to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bobby.prani@gmail.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=dvhart@linux.intel.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=patrick.marlier@gmail.com \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=wangyun@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®