mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@kernel.org,
	laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com,
	josh@joshtriplett.org, tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org,
	dhowells@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com, dvhart@linux.intel.com,
	fweisbec@gmail.com, oleg@redhat.com, bobby.prani@gmail.com,
	Patrick Marlier <patrick.marlier@gmail.com>,
	wangyun@linux.vnet.ibm.com, neilb@suse.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 3/4] md/bitmap: Fix list_entry_rcu usage
Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 22:38:53 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150512223853.55e0ed90@grimm.local.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1431470787-4702-3-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

On Tue, 12 May 2015 15:46:26 -0700
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:

> From: Patrick Marlier <patrick.marlier@gmail.com>
> 
> Signed-off-by: Patrick Marlier <patrick.marlier@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
>  drivers/md/bitmap.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/md/bitmap.c b/drivers/md/bitmap.c
> index 2bc56e2a3526..32901772e4ee 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/bitmap.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/bitmap.c
> @@ -181,7 +181,7 @@ static struct md_rdev *next_active_rdev(struct md_rdev *rdev, struct mddev *mdde
>  	rcu_read_lock();
>  	if (rdev == NULL)
>  		/* start at the beginning */
> -		rdev = list_entry_rcu(&mddev->disks, struct md_rdev, same_set);
> +		rdev = list_entry_rcu(mddev->disks.next, struct md_rdev, same_set);

Hmm, this changes the semantics.

The original code looks nasty, I first thought it was broken, but it
seems to work out of sheer luck (or clever hack)

>  	else {
>  		/* release the previous rdev and start from there. */
>  		rdev_dec_pending(rdev, mddev);


What comes after this is:

	list_for_each_entry_continue_rcu(rdev, &mddev->disks, same_set) {
		if (rdev->raid_disk >= 0 &&

Now the original code had:

  rdev = list_entry_rcu(&mddev->disks, struct md_rdev, same_set);

Where &mddev->disks would return the address of the disks field of
mddev which is a list head. Then it would get the 'same_set' offset,
which is 0, and rdev is pointing to a makeshift md_rdev struct. But it
isn't used, as the list_for_each_entry_continue_rcu() has:

#define list_for_each_entry_continue_rcu(pos, head, member) 		\
	for (pos = list_entry_rcu(pos->member.next, typeof(*pos), member); \
	     &pos->member != (head);	\
	     pos = list_entry_rcu(pos->member.next, typeof(*pos), member))

Thus the first use of pos is pos->member.next or:

  mddev->disks.next

But now you converted it to rdev = mddev->disks.next, which means the
first use is:

  pos = mddev->disks.next->next

I think you are skipping the first element here.

-- Steve

  reply	other threads:[~2015-05-13  2:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-05-12 22:46 [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/4] RCU-protected list updates for 4.2 Paul E. McKenney
2015-05-12 22:46 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 1/4] rculist: Fix another sparse warning Paul E. McKenney
2015-05-12 22:46   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 2/4] rculist: Fix list_entry_rcu to read ptr with rcu_dereference_raw Paul E. McKenney
2015-05-12 22:46   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 3/4] md/bitmap: Fix list_entry_rcu usage Paul E. McKenney
2015-05-13  2:38     ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2015-05-13  2:58       ` NeilBrown
2015-05-13 13:17         ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-05-16 17:42         ` Patrick Marlier
2015-05-18  2:06           ` NeilBrown
2015-05-18 13:43             ` Steven Rostedt
2015-05-19 22:07               ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-05-20  5:09                 ` NeilBrown
2015-05-20 13:28                   ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-05-21  0:07                     ` NeilBrown
2015-09-11 23:05                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-09-13 10:06                   ` Patrick Marlier
2015-09-13 16:10                     ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-09-22 20:50                       ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-09-23 17:57                         ` Patrick Marlier
2015-09-24  4:45                           ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-05-18 13:53             ` Patrick Marlier
2015-05-18 19:36               ` Patrick Marlier
2015-05-12 22:46   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 4/4] netfilter: " Paul E. McKenney
2015-05-13  2:42     ` Steven Rostedt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150512223853.55e0ed90@grimm.local.home \
    --to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bobby.prani@gmail.com \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=dvhart@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=neilb@suse.de \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=patrick.marlier@gmail.com \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=wangyun@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®