From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@kernel.org,
laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com,
josh@joshtriplett.org, tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org,
dhowells@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com, dvhart@linux.intel.com,
fweisbec@gmail.com, oleg@redhat.com, bobby.prani@gmail.com,
Patrick Marlier <patrick.marlier@gmail.com>,
wangyun@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 3/4] md/bitmap: Fix list_entry_rcu usage
Date: Wed, 13 May 2015 12:58:39 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150513125839.371ef677@notabene.brown> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150512223853.55e0ed90@grimm.local.home>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2934 bytes --]
On Tue, 12 May 2015 22:38:53 -0400 Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:
> On Tue, 12 May 2015 15:46:26 -0700
> "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> > From: Patrick Marlier <patrick.marlier@gmail.com>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Patrick Marlier <patrick.marlier@gmail.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/md/bitmap.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/md/bitmap.c b/drivers/md/bitmap.c
> > index 2bc56e2a3526..32901772e4ee 100644
> > --- a/drivers/md/bitmap.c
> > +++ b/drivers/md/bitmap.c
> > @@ -181,7 +181,7 @@ static struct md_rdev *next_active_rdev(struct md_rdev *rdev, struct mddev *mdde
> > rcu_read_lock();
> > if (rdev == NULL)
> > /* start at the beginning */
> > - rdev = list_entry_rcu(&mddev->disks, struct md_rdev, same_set);
> > + rdev = list_entry_rcu(mddev->disks.next, struct md_rdev, same_set);
>
> Hmm, this changes the semantics.
>
> The original code looks nasty, I first thought it was broken, but it
> seems to work out of sheer luck (or clever hack)
Definitely a clever hack - no question of "luck" here :-)
It might makes sense to change it to use list_for_each_entry_from_rcu()
if (rdev == NULL)
rdev = list_entry_rcu(mddev->disks.next, struct md_rdev, same_set);
else {
rdev_dec_pending(rdev, mddev);
rdev = list_next_entry_rcu(rdev->same_set.next, struct md_rdev, same_set);
}
list_for_each_entry_from_rcu(rdev, ....)
but there isn't a "list_next_entry_rcu"....
Also, it would have been polity to at least 'cc' them Maintainer of this code
in the original patch - no?
Thanks,
NeilBrown
>
> > else {
> > /* release the previous rdev and start from there. */
> > rdev_dec_pending(rdev, mddev);
>
>
> What comes after this is:
>
> list_for_each_entry_continue_rcu(rdev, &mddev->disks, same_set) {
> if (rdev->raid_disk >= 0 &&
>
> Now the original code had:
>
> rdev = list_entry_rcu(&mddev->disks, struct md_rdev, same_set);
>
> Where &mddev->disks would return the address of the disks field of
> mddev which is a list head. Then it would get the 'same_set' offset,
> which is 0, and rdev is pointing to a makeshift md_rdev struct. But it
> isn't used, as the list_for_each_entry_continue_rcu() has:
>
> #define list_for_each_entry_continue_rcu(pos, head, member) \
> for (pos = list_entry_rcu(pos->member.next, typeof(*pos), member); \
> &pos->member != (head); \
> pos = list_entry_rcu(pos->member.next, typeof(*pos), member))
>
> Thus the first use of pos is pos->member.next or:
>
> mddev->disks.next
>
> But now you converted it to rdev = mddev->disks.next, which means the
> first use is:
>
> pos = mddev->disks.next->next
>
> I think you are skipping the first element here.
>
> -- Steve
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 811 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-13 2:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-12 22:46 [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/4] RCU-protected list updates for 4.2 Paul E. McKenney
2015-05-12 22:46 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 1/4] rculist: Fix another sparse warning Paul E. McKenney
2015-05-12 22:46 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 2/4] rculist: Fix list_entry_rcu to read ptr with rcu_dereference_raw Paul E. McKenney
2015-05-12 22:46 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 3/4] md/bitmap: Fix list_entry_rcu usage Paul E. McKenney
2015-05-13 2:38 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-05-13 2:58 ` NeilBrown [this message]
2015-05-13 13:17 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-05-16 17:42 ` Patrick Marlier
2015-05-18 2:06 ` NeilBrown
2015-05-18 13:43 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-05-19 22:07 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-05-20 5:09 ` NeilBrown
2015-05-20 13:28 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-05-21 0:07 ` NeilBrown
2015-09-11 23:05 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-09-13 10:06 ` Patrick Marlier
2015-09-13 16:10 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-09-22 20:50 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-09-23 17:57 ` Patrick Marlier
2015-09-24 4:45 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-05-18 13:53 ` Patrick Marlier
2015-05-18 19:36 ` Patrick Marlier
2015-05-12 22:46 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 4/4] netfilter: " Paul E. McKenney
2015-05-13 2:42 ` Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150513125839.371ef677@notabene.brown \
--to=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bobby.prani@gmail.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=dvhart@linux.intel.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=patrick.marlier@gmail.com \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=wangyun@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®