From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>,
Dave Jones <davej@codemonkey.org.uk>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>,
Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>,
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Jiri Bohac <jbohac@suse.cz>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuahkh@osg.samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5 v2] Fixes for leapsecond expiring early ABS_TIME CLOCK_REALTIME timers
Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2015 09:17:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150613071752.GB27446@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1506122010440.3786@nanos>
* Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Jun 2015, John Stultz wrote:
> > Well, noticing the -tip merge messages in my inbox, it may actually
> > make it for 4.2 (after all the push-back from last time, I expected
> > there would still be more), but still not something I'm wanting to
> > aggressively push to -stable.
>
> Yes, I decided to take it now. It looks really sane and reasonable
> simple. So it's better to get it exposed sooner than later.
Yes, and June 30 is drawing close, with the next leap second, giving us a natural
testbed.
Obviously no production system should use this as around June 30 we'll be around
-rc1 or so. But this way it should see some 'real world' testing.
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-13 7:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-11 22:54 John Stultz
2015-06-11 22:54 ` [PATCH 1/5] time: Move clock_was_set_seq update to before we update the shadow-timekeeper John Stultz
2015-06-12 9:31 ` [tip:timers/core] time: Move clock_was_set_seq update before updating shadow-timekeeper tip-bot for John Stultz
2015-06-11 22:54 ` [PATCH 2/5] ntp: Introduce and use SECS_PER_DAY macro instead of 86400 John Stultz
2015-06-12 9:31 ` [tip:timers/core] " tip-bot for John Stultz
2015-06-11 22:54 ` [PATCH 3/5] time: Do leapsecond adjustment to avoid early timer expirations John Stultz
2015-06-12 9:32 ` [tip:timers/core] time: Prevent early expiry of hrtimers[ CLOCK_REALTIME] at the leap second edge tip-bot for John Stultz
2015-06-11 22:54 ` [PATCH 4/5] ntp: Do leapsecond adjustment in adjtimex read path John Stultz
2015-06-12 7:37 ` Richard Cochran
2015-06-12 9:32 ` [tip:timers/core] " tip-bot for John Stultz
2015-06-11 22:54 ` [PATCH 5/5] selftests: timers: Add leap-second timer edge testing to leap-a-day.c John Stultz
2015-06-12 9:32 ` [tip:timers/core] " tip-bot for John Stultz
2015-06-12 14:52 ` [PATCH 0/5 v2] Fixes for leapsecond expiring early ABS_TIME CLOCK_REALTIME timers Dave Jones
2015-06-12 14:55 ` Prarit Bhargava
2015-06-12 14:59 ` Dave Jones
2015-06-12 15:02 ` Prarit Bhargava
2015-06-12 17:58 ` John Stultz
2015-06-12 18:06 ` John Stultz
2015-06-12 18:11 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-06-13 7:17 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2015-06-15 13:10 ` Prarit Bhargava
2015-06-15 13:46 ` Prarit Bhargava
2015-06-15 18:55 ` John Stultz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150613071752.GB27446@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=bristot@redhat.com \
--cc=davej@codemonkey.org.uk \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jbohac@suse.cz \
--cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=prarit@redhat.com \
--cc=richardcochran@gmail.com \
--cc=shuahkh@osg.samsung.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®