From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Cc: acme@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jolsa@redhat.com,
eranian@google.com, Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] x86, perf: Add option to disable reading branch flags/cycles
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2015 12:48:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150615104813.GU3644@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1432786398-23861-3-git-send-email-andi@firstfloor.org>
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 09:13:15PM -0700, Andi Kleen wrote:
> From: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
>
> With LBRv5 reading the extra LBR flags like mispredict, TSX, cycles
> is not free anymore, as it has moved to a separate MSR.
>
> For callstack mode we don't need any of this information; so we can
> avoid the unnecessary MSR read. Add flags to the perf interface
> where perf record can request not collecting this information.
> I added sample_type flags for CYCLES and FLAGS. It's a bit unusual for
> sample_types to be negative (disable), not positive (enable), but
> since the legacy ABI reported the flags we need some form of explicit
> disabling to avoid breaking the ABI. In theory it would be possible
> to make CYCLES opt-in (as it's not deployed yet), but I also made it
> opt-out to be symmetric to FLAGS.
>
> After we have the flags the x86 perf code can keep track if any
> users need the flags. If noone needs it the information is not
> collected.
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_lbr.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_lbr.c
> index 1fd8b5a..5de2048 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_lbr.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_lbr.c
> @@ -340,6 +340,10 @@ void intel_pmu_lbr_enable(struct perf_event *event)
> }
>
> cpuc->lbr_users++;
> + if (!(event->attr.sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_NO_FLAGS))
> + cpuc->lbr_flags_users++;
> + if (!(event->attr.sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_NO_CYCLES))
> + cpuc->lbr_cycles_users++;
> perf_sched_cb_inc(event->ctx->pmu);
> }
This patch seems to add an unfortunate amount of branches. And while I
appreciate it'll all be cheaper than the SKL MSR read, it does add
overhead to the older chips.
Also, I think its broken. We can now have two events, with the 'same'
LBR config but with different flags/cycles settings.
__intel_shared_reg_get_constraints() will find a match, but the enable
code above will disable flags/cycles for both of them.
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h b/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h
> index 1b8bd4a..8dd5765 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h
> @@ -138,6 +138,8 @@ enum perf_event_sample_format {
> PERF_SAMPLE_IDENTIFIER = 1U << 16,
> PERF_SAMPLE_TRANSACTION = 1U << 17,
> PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_INTR = 1U << 18,
> + PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_NO_FLAGS = 1U << 19,
> + PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_NO_CYCLES = 1U << 20,
>
> PERF_SAMPLE_MAX = 1U << 19, /* non-ABI */
> };
Should this not be part of perf_branch_sample_type instead? That seems
to otherwise specify all the branch stack details.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-15 10:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-28 4:13 Andi Kleen
2015-05-28 4:13 ` [PATCH 1/5] x86, perf: Allow time stamp for free running PEBSv3 Andi Kleen
2015-08-04 8:56 ` [tip:perf/core] perf/x86/intel/lbr: " tip-bot for Andi Kleen
2015-05-28 4:13 ` [PATCH 2/5] x86, perf: Add option to disable reading branch flags/cycles Andi Kleen
2015-06-15 10:48 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2015-05-28 4:13 ` [PATCH 3/5] perf, tools: Disable branch flags/cycles for lbr call graph Andi Kleen
2015-05-28 4:13 ` [PATCH 4/5] x86, perf: Use correct index to save/restore LBR_INFO with callstack Andi Kleen
2015-08-04 8:59 ` [tip:perf/core] perf/x86/intel/lbr: Use correct index to save/ restore LBR_INFO with call stack tip-bot for Andi Kleen
2015-05-28 4:13 ` [PATCH 5/5] x86, perf: Limit LBR accesses to TOS in callstack mode Andi Kleen
2015-08-04 8:59 ` [tip:perf/core] perf/x86/intel/lbr: " tip-bot for Andi Kleen
2015-10-20 18:46 [PATCH 1/5] x86, perf: Fix LBR call stack save/restore Andi Kleen
2015-10-20 18:46 ` [PATCH 2/5] x86, perf: Add option to disable reading branch flags/cycles Andi Kleen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150615104813.GU3644@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome