From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Ananth Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>,
Anton Arapov <arapov@gmail.com>,
David Long <dave.long@linaro.org>,
Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>,
"Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@redhat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Jan Willeke <willeke@de.ibm.com>,
Jim Keniston <jkenisto@us.ibm.com>,
Mark Wielaard <mjw@redhat.com>,
Pratyush Anand <panand@redhat.com>,
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 10/11] uprobes: Add the "enum rp_check ctx" arg to arch_uretprobe_is_alive()
Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2015 03:23:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150707012310.GA7550@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150707012210.GA7466@redhat.com>
arch/x86 doesn't care (so far), but as Pratyush Anand pointed out
other architectures might want why arch_uretprobe_is_alive() was
called and use different checks depending on the context. Add the
new argument to distinguish 2 callers.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c | 3 ++-
include/linux/uprobes.h | 7 ++++++-
kernel/events/uprobes.c | 9 ++++++---
3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c b/arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c
index 9d5f570..67eb168 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c
@@ -994,7 +994,8 @@ arch_uretprobe_hijack_return_addr(unsigned long trampoline_vaddr, struct pt_regs
return -1;
}
-bool arch_uretprobe_is_alive(struct return_instance *ret, struct pt_regs *regs)
+bool arch_uretprobe_is_alive(struct return_instance *ret, enum rp_check ctx,
+ struct pt_regs *regs)
{
return regs->sp <= ret->stack;
}
diff --git a/include/linux/uprobes.h b/include/linux/uprobes.h
index 7ab6d2c..c0a5402 100644
--- a/include/linux/uprobes.h
+++ b/include/linux/uprobes.h
@@ -102,6 +102,11 @@ struct return_instance {
struct return_instance *next; /* keep as stack */
};
+enum rp_check {
+ RP_CHECK_CALL,
+ RP_CHECK_RET,
+};
+
struct xol_area;
struct uprobes_state {
@@ -138,7 +143,7 @@ extern bool arch_uprobe_xol_was_trapped(struct task_struct *tsk);
extern int arch_uprobe_exception_notify(struct notifier_block *self, unsigned long val, void *data);
extern void arch_uprobe_abort_xol(struct arch_uprobe *aup, struct pt_regs *regs);
extern unsigned long arch_uretprobe_hijack_return_addr(unsigned long trampoline_vaddr, struct pt_regs *regs);
-extern bool arch_uretprobe_is_alive(struct return_instance *ret, struct pt_regs *regs);
+extern bool arch_uretprobe_is_alive(struct return_instance *ret, enum rp_check ctx, struct pt_regs *regs);
extern bool arch_uprobe_ignore(struct arch_uprobe *aup, struct pt_regs *regs);
extern void arch_uprobe_copy_ixol(struct page *page, unsigned long vaddr,
void *src, unsigned long len);
diff --git a/kernel/events/uprobes.c b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
index 7e61c8c..df5661a 100644
--- a/kernel/events/uprobes.c
+++ b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
@@ -1514,7 +1514,9 @@ static unsigned long get_trampoline_vaddr(void)
static void cleanup_return_instances(struct uprobe_task *utask, struct pt_regs *regs)
{
struct return_instance *ri = utask->return_instances;
- while (ri && !arch_uretprobe_is_alive(ri, regs)) {
+ enum rp_check ctx = RP_CHECK_CALL;
+
+ while (ri && !arch_uretprobe_is_alive(ri, ctx, regs)) {
ri = free_ret_instance(ri);
utask->depth--;
}
@@ -1805,7 +1807,7 @@ static void handle_trampoline(struct pt_regs *regs)
* could hit this trampoline on return. TODO: sigaltstack().
*/
next = find_next_ret_chain(ri);
- valid = !next || arch_uretprobe_is_alive(next, regs);
+ valid = !next || arch_uretprobe_is_alive(next, RP_CHECK_RET, regs);
instruction_pointer_set(regs, ri->orig_ret_vaddr);
do {
@@ -1830,7 +1832,8 @@ bool __weak arch_uprobe_ignore(struct arch_uprobe *aup, struct pt_regs *regs)
return false;
}
-bool __weak arch_uretprobe_is_alive(struct return_instance *ret, struct pt_regs *regs)
+bool __weak arch_uretprobe_is_alive(struct return_instance *ret, enum rp_check ctx,
+ struct pt_regs *regs)
{
return true;
}
--
1.5.5.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-07 1:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-07 1:22 [PATCH v2 00/11] uprobes: longjmp fixes Oleg Nesterov
2015-07-07 1:22 ` [PATCH v2 01/11] uprobes: Introduce get_uprobe() Oleg Nesterov
2015-07-07 12:44 ` Anton Arapov
2015-07-07 1:22 ` [PATCH v2 02/11] uprobes: Introduce free_ret_instance() Oleg Nesterov
2015-07-07 12:46 ` Anton Arapov
2015-07-07 1:22 ` [PATCH v2 03/11] uprobes: Send SIGILL if handle_trampoline() fails Oleg Nesterov
2015-07-07 12:51 ` Anton Arapov
2015-07-07 1:22 ` [PATCH v2 04/11] uprobes: Change prepare_uretprobe() to use uprobe_warn() Oleg Nesterov
2015-07-07 12:52 ` Anton Arapov
2015-07-07 1:22 ` [PATCH v2 05/11] uprobes: Change handle_trampoline() to find the next chain beforehand Oleg Nesterov
2015-07-07 12:54 ` Anton Arapov
2015-07-07 1:22 ` [PATCH v2 06/11] uprobes: Export struct return_instance, introduce arch_uretprobe_is_alive() Oleg Nesterov
2015-07-07 12:58 ` Anton Arapov
2015-07-10 11:52 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2015-07-07 1:22 ` [PATCH v2 07/11] uprobes/x86: Reimplement arch_uretprobe_is_alive() Oleg Nesterov
2015-07-07 13:02 ` Anton Arapov
2015-07-10 11:53 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2015-07-07 1:23 ` [PATCH v2 08/11] uprobes: Change handle_trampoline() to flush the frames invalidated by longjmp() Oleg Nesterov
2015-07-07 13:05 ` Anton Arapov
2015-07-10 11:55 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2015-07-07 1:23 ` [PATCH v2 09/11] uprobes: Change prepare_uretprobe() to (try to) flush the dead frames Oleg Nesterov
2015-07-07 13:07 ` Anton Arapov
2015-07-10 11:57 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2015-07-07 1:23 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2015-07-07 13:08 ` [PATCH v2 10/11] uprobes: Add the "enum rp_check ctx" arg to arch_uretprobe_is_alive() Anton Arapov
2015-07-10 12:06 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2015-07-07 1:23 ` [PATCH v2 11/11] uprobes/x86: Make arch_uretprobe_is_alive(RP_CHECK_CALL) more clever Oleg Nesterov
2015-07-07 13:11 ` Anton Arapov
2015-07-10 12:07 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2015-07-10 12:01 ` [PATCH v2 00/11] uprobes: longjmp fixes Pratyush Anand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150707012310.GA7550@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=ananth@in.ibm.com \
--cc=arapov@gmail.com \
--cc=dave.long@linaro.org \
--cc=dvlasenk@redhat.com \
--cc=fche@redhat.com \
--cc=jkenisto@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=mjw@redhat.com \
--cc=panand@redhat.com \
--cc=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=willeke@de.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome