From: Anton Arapov <arapov@gmail.com>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Ananth Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>,
David Long <dave.long@linaro.org>,
Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>,
"Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@redhat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Jan Willeke <willeke@de.ibm.com>,
Jim Keniston <jkenisto@us.ibm.com>,
Mark Wielaard <mjw@redhat.com>,
Pratyush Anand <panand@redhat.com>,
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/11] uprobes: Send SIGILL if handle_trampoline() fails
Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2015 14:51:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150707125123.GC5946@troglodyte.intinfra.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150707012243.GA7500@redhat.com>
On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 03:22:43AM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> 1. It doesn't make sense to continue if handle_trampoline() fails,
> change handle_swbp() to always return after this call.
>
> 2. Turn pr_warn() into uprobe_warn(), and change handle_trampoline()
> to send SIGILL on failure. It is pointless to return to user mode
> with the corrupted instruction_pointer() which we can't restore.
>
> Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
> Acked-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Anton Arapov <arapov@gmail.com>
> ---
> kernel/events/uprobes.c | 21 ++++++++++-----------
> 1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/events/uprobes.c b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
> index d8c702f..eabdc21 100644
> --- a/kernel/events/uprobes.c
> +++ b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
> @@ -1770,7 +1770,7 @@ handle_uretprobe_chain(struct return_instance *ri, struct pt_regs *regs)
> up_read(&uprobe->register_rwsem);
> }
>
> -static bool handle_trampoline(struct pt_regs *regs)
> +static void handle_trampoline(struct pt_regs *regs)
> {
> struct uprobe_task *utask;
> struct return_instance *ri;
> @@ -1778,11 +1778,11 @@ static bool handle_trampoline(struct pt_regs *regs)
>
> utask = current->utask;
> if (!utask)
> - return false;
> + goto sigill;
>
> ri = utask->return_instances;
> if (!ri)
> - return false;
> + goto sigill;
>
> /*
> * TODO: we should throw out return_instance's invalidated by
> @@ -1804,8 +1804,12 @@ static bool handle_trampoline(struct pt_regs *regs)
> }
>
> utask->return_instances = ri;
> + return;
> +
> + sigill:
> + uprobe_warn(current, "handle uretprobe, sending SIGILL.");
> + force_sig_info(SIGILL, SEND_SIG_FORCED, current);
>
> - return true;
> }
>
> bool __weak arch_uprobe_ignore(struct arch_uprobe *aup, struct pt_regs *regs)
> @@ -1824,13 +1828,8 @@ static void handle_swbp(struct pt_regs *regs)
> int uninitialized_var(is_swbp);
>
> bp_vaddr = uprobe_get_swbp_addr(regs);
> - if (bp_vaddr == get_trampoline_vaddr()) {
> - if (handle_trampoline(regs))
> - return;
> -
> - pr_warn("uprobe: unable to handle uretprobe pid/tgid=%d/%d\n",
> - current->pid, current->tgid);
> - }
> + if (bp_vaddr == get_trampoline_vaddr())
> + return handle_trampoline(regs);
>
> uprobe = find_active_uprobe(bp_vaddr, &is_swbp);
> if (!uprobe) {
> --
> 1.5.5.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-07 12:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-07 1:22 [PATCH v2 00/11] uprobes: longjmp fixes Oleg Nesterov
2015-07-07 1:22 ` [PATCH v2 01/11] uprobes: Introduce get_uprobe() Oleg Nesterov
2015-07-07 12:44 ` Anton Arapov
2015-07-07 1:22 ` [PATCH v2 02/11] uprobes: Introduce free_ret_instance() Oleg Nesterov
2015-07-07 12:46 ` Anton Arapov
2015-07-07 1:22 ` [PATCH v2 03/11] uprobes: Send SIGILL if handle_trampoline() fails Oleg Nesterov
2015-07-07 12:51 ` Anton Arapov [this message]
2015-07-07 1:22 ` [PATCH v2 04/11] uprobes: Change prepare_uretprobe() to use uprobe_warn() Oleg Nesterov
2015-07-07 12:52 ` Anton Arapov
2015-07-07 1:22 ` [PATCH v2 05/11] uprobes: Change handle_trampoline() to find the next chain beforehand Oleg Nesterov
2015-07-07 12:54 ` Anton Arapov
2015-07-07 1:22 ` [PATCH v2 06/11] uprobes: Export struct return_instance, introduce arch_uretprobe_is_alive() Oleg Nesterov
2015-07-07 12:58 ` Anton Arapov
2015-07-10 11:52 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2015-07-07 1:22 ` [PATCH v2 07/11] uprobes/x86: Reimplement arch_uretprobe_is_alive() Oleg Nesterov
2015-07-07 13:02 ` Anton Arapov
2015-07-10 11:53 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2015-07-07 1:23 ` [PATCH v2 08/11] uprobes: Change handle_trampoline() to flush the frames invalidated by longjmp() Oleg Nesterov
2015-07-07 13:05 ` Anton Arapov
2015-07-10 11:55 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2015-07-07 1:23 ` [PATCH v2 09/11] uprobes: Change prepare_uretprobe() to (try to) flush the dead frames Oleg Nesterov
2015-07-07 13:07 ` Anton Arapov
2015-07-10 11:57 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2015-07-07 1:23 ` [PATCH v2 10/11] uprobes: Add the "enum rp_check ctx" arg to arch_uretprobe_is_alive() Oleg Nesterov
2015-07-07 13:08 ` Anton Arapov
2015-07-10 12:06 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2015-07-07 1:23 ` [PATCH v2 11/11] uprobes/x86: Make arch_uretprobe_is_alive(RP_CHECK_CALL) more clever Oleg Nesterov
2015-07-07 13:11 ` Anton Arapov
2015-07-10 12:07 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2015-07-10 12:01 ` [PATCH v2 00/11] uprobes: longjmp fixes Pratyush Anand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150707125123.GC5946@troglodyte.intinfra.com \
--to=arapov@gmail.com \
--cc=ananth@in.ibm.com \
--cc=dave.long@linaro.org \
--cc=dvlasenk@redhat.com \
--cc=fche@redhat.com \
--cc=jkenisto@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=mjw@redhat.com \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=panand@redhat.com \
--cc=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=willeke@de.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®