From: Pratyush Anand <panand@redhat.com>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Ananth Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>,
Anton Arapov <arapov@gmail.com>,
David Long <dave.long@linaro.org>,
Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>,
"Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@redhat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Jan Willeke <willeke@de.ibm.com>,
Jim Keniston <jkenisto@us.ibm.com>,
Mark Wielaard <mjw@redhat.com>,
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/11] uprobes: longjmp fixes
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 17:31:04 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150710120104.GA8855@dhcppc13.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150707012210.GA7466@redhat.com>
Hi Oleg,
Thanks a lot for the patches.
I did corresponding changes [1] for arch_uretprobe_is_alive on top of
my ARM64 RFC V2 [2] + these patches and found that longjump tests are working.
So for the series's common code
Tested-by: Pratyush Anand <panand@redhat.com>
~Pratyush
[1] https://github.com/pratyushanand/linux/commit/880df93e2dac48f620069fffb16d551e96681774
[2] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1979016
On 07/07/2015:03:22:10 AM, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> Sorry for delay,
>
> Currently ret-probes can't work (the application will likely crash)
> if the probed function does not return, and this is even documented
> in handle_trampoline().
>
> This series tries to make the first step to fix the problem, assuming
> that the probed functions use the same stack.
>
> TODO: sigaltstack() can obviously break this assumption.
>
> NOTE: I don't think it is possible to make this logic 100% correct,
> the user-space can do everything with its stack. For example, the
> application can do longjmp-like tricks to implement the coroutines,
> the kernel can do nothing in this case. The application (or debugger)
> should cooperate somehow to let the kernel know whats going on.
>
> v2, based on disccsussion with Srikar and Pratyush:
>
> 1-5: Unchanged, I preserved the acks from Srikar.
>
> 6-11: The only essential change is that we do not add the
> (ugly) arch_uretprobe, we just export return_instance
> to arch/.
>
> This means that we do not need to touch the !x86 code,
> and return_instance->stack can be initialized by the
> generic code.
>
> Srikar, I hope you can ack v2 too.
>
> 10/11: New. As Pratyush pointed out "bool on_call" is too
> limited.
>
> Plus v2 fixes the problem mentioned in "self nack" email, we must
> not do cleanup_return_instances() after prepare_uretprobe() checks
> chained && utask->return_instances != NULL.
>
> Oleg.
>
> arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c | 9 ++
> include/linux/uprobes.h | 17 ++++
> kernel/events/uprobes.c | 184 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
> 3 files changed, 128 insertions(+), 82 deletions(-)
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-10 12:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-07 1:22 Oleg Nesterov
2015-07-07 1:22 ` [PATCH v2 01/11] uprobes: Introduce get_uprobe() Oleg Nesterov
2015-07-07 12:44 ` Anton Arapov
2015-07-07 1:22 ` [PATCH v2 02/11] uprobes: Introduce free_ret_instance() Oleg Nesterov
2015-07-07 12:46 ` Anton Arapov
2015-07-07 1:22 ` [PATCH v2 03/11] uprobes: Send SIGILL if handle_trampoline() fails Oleg Nesterov
2015-07-07 12:51 ` Anton Arapov
2015-07-07 1:22 ` [PATCH v2 04/11] uprobes: Change prepare_uretprobe() to use uprobe_warn() Oleg Nesterov
2015-07-07 12:52 ` Anton Arapov
2015-07-07 1:22 ` [PATCH v2 05/11] uprobes: Change handle_trampoline() to find the next chain beforehand Oleg Nesterov
2015-07-07 12:54 ` Anton Arapov
2015-07-07 1:22 ` [PATCH v2 06/11] uprobes: Export struct return_instance, introduce arch_uretprobe_is_alive() Oleg Nesterov
2015-07-07 12:58 ` Anton Arapov
2015-07-10 11:52 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2015-07-07 1:22 ` [PATCH v2 07/11] uprobes/x86: Reimplement arch_uretprobe_is_alive() Oleg Nesterov
2015-07-07 13:02 ` Anton Arapov
2015-07-10 11:53 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2015-07-07 1:23 ` [PATCH v2 08/11] uprobes: Change handle_trampoline() to flush the frames invalidated by longjmp() Oleg Nesterov
2015-07-07 13:05 ` Anton Arapov
2015-07-10 11:55 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2015-07-07 1:23 ` [PATCH v2 09/11] uprobes: Change prepare_uretprobe() to (try to) flush the dead frames Oleg Nesterov
2015-07-07 13:07 ` Anton Arapov
2015-07-10 11:57 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2015-07-07 1:23 ` [PATCH v2 10/11] uprobes: Add the "enum rp_check ctx" arg to arch_uretprobe_is_alive() Oleg Nesterov
2015-07-07 13:08 ` Anton Arapov
2015-07-10 12:06 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2015-07-07 1:23 ` [PATCH v2 11/11] uprobes/x86: Make arch_uretprobe_is_alive(RP_CHECK_CALL) more clever Oleg Nesterov
2015-07-07 13:11 ` Anton Arapov
2015-07-10 12:07 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2015-07-10 12:01 ` Pratyush Anand [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150710120104.GA8855@dhcppc13.redhat.com \
--to=panand@redhat.com \
--cc=ananth@in.ibm.com \
--cc=arapov@gmail.com \
--cc=dave.long@linaro.org \
--cc=dvlasenk@redhat.com \
--cc=fche@redhat.com \
--cc=jkenisto@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=mjw@redhat.com \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=willeke@de.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome