From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Dave Hansen <dave@sr71.net>
Cc: dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, mingo@redhat.com, x86@kernel.org,
bp@alien8.de, fenghua.yu@intel.com, tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/11] x86, fpu: add C structures for AVX-512 state components
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2015 07:00:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150828050000.GC25556@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150827171110.76A7A0C2@viggo.jf.intel.com>
* Dave Hansen <dave@sr71.net> wrote:
>
> From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
>
> AVX-512 has 3 separate state components:
> 1. opmask registers
> 2. zmm upper half of registers 0-15
> 3. new zmm registers (16-31)
>
> This patch adds C structures for the three components along with
> a few comments mostly lifted from the SDM to explain what they
> do. This will allow us to check our structures against what the
> hardware tells us about the sizes of the components.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
> Cc: x86@kernel.org
> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
> Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
> Cc: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> ---
>
> b/arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/types.h | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff -puN arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/types.h~avx-512-structs arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/types.h
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/types.h~avx-512-structs 2015-08-27 10:08:03.909740783 -0700
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/types.h 2015-08-27 10:08:03.912740919 -0700
> @@ -129,6 +129,12 @@ enum xfeature_nr {
> struct reg_128_bit {
> u8 regbytes[128/8];
> };
> +struct reg_256_bit {
> + u8 regbytes[256/8];
> +};
> +struct reg_512_bit {
> + u8 regbytes[512/8];
> +};
>
> /*
> * State component 2:
> @@ -177,6 +183,33 @@ struct mpx_bndcsr_state {
> };
> } __packed;
>
> +/* AVX-512 Components: */
> +
> +/*
> + * State component 5 is used for the 8 64-bit opmask registers
> + * k0–k7 (opmask state).
> + */
> +struct avx_512_opmask_state {
> + u64 opmask_reg[8];
> +} __packed;
> +
> +/*
> + * State component 6 is used for the upper 256 bits of the
> + * registers ZMM0–ZMM15. These 16 256-bit values are denoted
> + * ZMM0_H–ZMM15_H (ZMM_Hi256 state).
> + */
> +struct avx_512_zmm_uppers_state {
> + struct reg_256_bit zmm_upper[16];
> +} __packed;
> +
> +/*
> + * State component 7 is used for the 16 512-bit registers
> + * ZMM16–ZMM31 (Hi16_ZMM state).
> + */
> +struct avx_512_hi16_state {
> + struct reg_512_bit hi16_zmm[16];
> +} __packed;
> +
> struct xstate_header {
> u64 xfeatures;
> u64 xcomp_bv;
> @@ -184,9 +217,13 @@ struct xstate_header {
> } __attribute__((packed));
>
> /* New processor state extensions should be added here: */
> -#define XSTATE_RESERVE (sizeof(struct ymmh_struct) + \
> - sizeof(struct mpx_bndreg_state) + \
> - sizeof(struct mpx_bndcsr_state) )
> +#define XSTATE_RESERVE (sizeof(struct ymmh_struct) + \
> + sizeof(struct mpx_bndreg_state) + \
> + sizeof(struct mpx_bndcsr_state) + \
> + sizeof(struct avx_512_opmask_state) + \
> + sizeof(struct avx_512_zmm_uppers_state) + \
> + sizeof(struct avx_512_hi16_state))
So in a previous mail I suggested getting rid of XSTATE_RESERVE, which removes the
usage of the C structures..
What we could use these C structures for is to double check that the xstate size
given by CPUID for that particular xstate feature is equal to the C structure size
- or if it's larger, it's a multiple of the natural cache line size, or so?
Any 'failure' in such a check should be print-once and non-fatal, as in 90% of the
cases I'd expect the kernel assumptions/checks to be buggy, not the hardware
itself.
We should perhaps also print a gentle (non-warning) kernel message if we find an
xfeature that the kernel doesn't know about, with its essential parameters: the
bit number, the size and the offset position within the xstate buffer.
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-28 5:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-27 17:11 [PATCH 00/11] [v2] x86, fpu: XSAVE cleanups and sanity checks Dave Hansen
2015-08-27 17:11 ` [PATCH 01/11] x86, fpu: kill LWP support Dave Hansen
2015-08-28 4:50 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-08-27 17:11 ` [PATCH 02/11] x86, fpu: rename xfeature_bit Dave Hansen
2015-08-28 5:16 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-08-27 17:11 ` [PATCH 03/11] x86, fpu: rework XSTATE_* macros to remove magic '2' Dave Hansen
2015-08-27 17:11 ` [PATCH 04/11] x86, fpu: remove xfeature_nr Dave Hansen
2015-08-28 5:06 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-08-27 17:11 ` [PATCH 05/11] x86, fpu: add helper xfeature_nr_enabled() instead of test_bit() Dave Hansen
2015-08-28 5:04 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-08-27 17:11 ` [PATCH 06/11] x86, fpu: rework MPX 'xstate' types Dave Hansen
2015-08-27 17:11 ` [PATCH 07/11] x86, fpu: rework YMM definition Dave Hansen
2015-08-27 17:11 ` [PATCH 08/11] x86, fpu: add C structures for AVX-512 state components Dave Hansen
2015-08-28 5:00 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2015-08-27 17:11 ` [PATCH 10/11] x86, fpu: check to ensure increasing-offset xstate offsets Dave Hansen
2015-08-27 17:11 ` [PATCH 09/11] x86, fpu: correct and check XSAVE xstate size calculations Dave Hansen
2015-08-28 4:54 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-08-28 14:31 ` Dave Hansen
2015-08-28 16:44 ` Andi Kleen
2015-08-27 17:11 ` [PATCH 11/11] x86, fpu: check CPU-provided sizes against struct declarations Dave Hansen
2015-08-28 5:25 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-08-28 16:02 ` Dave Hansen
2015-08-28 5:18 ` [PATCH 00/11] [v2] x86, fpu: XSAVE cleanups and sanity checks Ingo Molnar
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-08-25 20:12 [PATCH 00/11] " Dave Hansen
2015-08-25 20:12 ` [PATCH 08/11] x86, fpu: add C structures for AVX-512 state components Dave Hansen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150828050000.GC25556@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dave@sr71.net \
--cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome