From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
axboe@kernel.dk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] cfq-iosched: Don't group_idle if cfqq has big thinktime
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2016 16:40:19 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160111154019.GH6262@quack.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160108165831.GU1898@mtj.duckdns.org>
On Fri 08-01-16 11:58:31, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello, Jan.
>
> On Thu, Jan 07, 2016 at 04:28:12PM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
> > @@ -2947,8 +2948,13 @@ static void cfq_arm_slice_timer(struct cfq_data *cfqd)
> > return;
> > }
> >
> > - /* There are other queues in the group, don't do group idle */
> > - if (group_idle && cfqq->cfqg->nr_cfqq > 1)
> > + /*
> > + * There are other queues in the group or this is the only group and
> > + * it has too big thinktime, don't do group idle.
> > + */
> > + if (group_idle &&
> > + (cfqq->cfqg->nr_cfqq > 1 ||
> > + !cfq_io_thinktime_big(cfqd, &st->ttime, true)))
> > return;
>
> Is the negation in front of the cfq_io_thinktime_big() right? That
> doesn't seem to match the comment or description. What am I missing?
Ah, you are right! I wanted to make arming of group_idle timer consistent
with what we test in cfq_should_idle() for normal idle timer but I
accidentally reverted the condition. I'll fix this.
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-11 15:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-07 15:28 [PATCH 0/5 v2] SYNC_NOIDLE preemption for ancestor cgroups Jan Kara
2016-01-07 15:28 ` [PATCH 1/5] cfq-iosched: Don't group_idle if cfqq has big thinktime Jan Kara
2016-01-08 16:58 ` Tejun Heo
2016-01-11 15:40 ` Jan Kara [this message]
2016-01-07 15:28 ` [PATCH 2/5] cfq-iosched: Reorder checks in cfq_should_preempt() Jan Kara
2016-01-08 16:59 ` Tejun Heo
2016-01-07 15:28 ` [PATCH 3/5] cfq-iosched: Allow sync noidle workloads to preempt each other Jan Kara
2016-01-08 18:13 ` Tejun Heo
2016-01-07 15:28 ` [PATCH 4/5] cgroup: Export cgroup_is_descendant() Jan Kara
2016-01-08 18:15 ` Tejun Heo
2016-01-07 15:28 ` [PATCH 5/5] cfq-iosched: Allow parent cgroup to preempt its child Jan Kara
2016-01-08 18:17 ` Tejun Heo
2016-01-12 15:24 [PATCH 0/5 v3] SYNC_NOIDLE preemption for ancestor cgroups Jan Kara
2016-01-12 15:24 ` [PATCH 1/5] cfq-iosched: Don't group_idle if cfqq has big thinktime Jan Kara
2016-01-12 16:17 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160111154019.GH6262@quack.suse.cz \
--to=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=jack@suse.com \
--cc=jmoyer@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome