From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Cc: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] regulator: core: Allow use of "status = disabled" in regulator dts nodes
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2016 17:32:03 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160427163203.GC3217@sirena.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5a4e35e8-2868-4c1f-7503-eeab7e30c9ee@redhat.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 968 bytes --]
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 05:54:48PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> On 27-04-16 17:52, Hans de Goede wrote:
> >On 27-04-16 17:50, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> >>On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 04:01:08PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> >>>To repeat you really shouldn't have *any* DT nodes for regulators that
> >>>aren't in use, there should be nothing to put in their nodes. If
> >>>there's anything there that's a sign that your DT has problems.
> >>How should we deal with regulators that are on by default but are not
> >>used in the system then?
> >I think we've already solved that one, we do list them, thereby giving the
> >regulator core permission to touch them and then let the regulator core
> >turn them off for us.
Yes.
> To clarify, I do not believe that this is not about not having nodes for
> unused regulators, but about not having nodes for regulators which should not
> be touched.
Correct. If we have constraints for a regulator then they should be
accurate.
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 473 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-27 16:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-27 14:03 [PATCH resend 0/2] " Hans de Goede
2016-04-27 14:03 ` [PATCH 1/2] " Hans de Goede
2016-04-27 14:24 ` Mark Brown
2016-04-27 14:31 ` Hans de Goede
2016-04-27 14:37 ` Mark Brown
2016-04-27 14:40 ` Hans de Goede
2016-04-27 15:01 ` Mark Brown
2016-04-27 15:50 ` Maxime Ripard
2016-04-27 15:52 ` Hans de Goede
2016-04-27 15:54 ` Hans de Goede
2016-04-27 16:32 ` Mark Brown [this message]
2016-04-27 14:03 ` [PATCH 2/2] regulator: axp20x: Handle regulator_register returning ENODEV Hans de Goede
2016-04-27 14:25 ` Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160427163203.GC3217@sirena.org.uk \
--to=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com \
--cc=wens@csie.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®