mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
	Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>,
	Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] regulator: core: Allow use of "status = disabled" in regulator dts nodes
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2016 16:31:02 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bdec8b43-88e1-dcfe-b185-9c6ae0b014c6@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160427142432.GR3217@sirena.org.uk>

Hi,

On 27-04-16 16:24, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 04:03:44PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
>
>> So if we want to use these pins as gpio pins we must not register
>> a regulator for these pins at all, otherwise any gpio use (switching
>> to input, or writing a value) gets undone when the regulator subsys
>> disables unused regulators at the end of kernel-init.
>
> The regulator API should not touch any regulators that it doesn't have
> permission to change the state for.  All other regulators are strictly
> read only.

How do we give permission to change state ? Is omitting the dts node,
and thus not returning a node / constrains from regulator_of_get_init_data
enough for the regulator API to not have permission ?

Is there any way to see this in sysfs ?

>> This commits allows the use of  "status = disabled" in regulator dts
>> nodes and makes regulator_register return ENODEV when this is set.
>
> If the regulator can't be changed why is it in the DT in the first
> place?

The regulator is part of the pmic and the axp20x regulator driver
registers all regulators on the pmic when the pmic-s mfd instantiated
regulators-platform-device gets probed.

We do use a whole bunch of the other regulators. This patch-set
is an attempt to make the control more fine-grained then register
all / no regulators by support status=disabled in the regulator
nodes. But maybe I'm missing something and this is not necessary,
see the earlier part of this reply.

Regards,

Hans

  reply	other threads:[~2016-04-27 14:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-04-27 14:03 [PATCH resend 0/2] " Hans de Goede
2016-04-27 14:03 ` [PATCH 1/2] " Hans de Goede
2016-04-27 14:24   ` Mark Brown
2016-04-27 14:31     ` Hans de Goede [this message]
2016-04-27 14:37       ` Mark Brown
2016-04-27 14:40         ` Hans de Goede
2016-04-27 15:01           ` Mark Brown
2016-04-27 15:50             ` Maxime Ripard
2016-04-27 15:52               ` Hans de Goede
2016-04-27 15:54                 ` Hans de Goede
2016-04-27 16:32                   ` Mark Brown
2016-04-27 14:03 ` [PATCH 2/2] regulator: axp20x: Handle regulator_register returning ENODEV Hans de Goede
2016-04-27 14:25   ` Mark Brown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bdec8b43-88e1-dcfe-b185-9c6ae0b014c6@redhat.com \
    --to=hdegoede@redhat.com \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=wens@csie.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®