Re: [patch v1] x86/platform/mellanox: introduce support for Mellanox systems platform

[Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>]

On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 07:48:24AM +0000, Vadim Pasternak wrote:
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Greg KH [mailto:gregkh@linuxfoundation.org]
> > Sent: Monday, September 12, 2016 10:41 AM
> > To: Vadim Pasternak <vadimp@mellanox.com>
> > Cc: tglx@linutronix.de; mingo@redhat.com; hpa@zytor.com;
> > davem@davemloft.net; geert@linux-m68k.org; akpm@linux-foundation.org;
> > kvalo@codeaurora.org; mchehab@kernel.org; linux@roeck-us.net;
> > x86@kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; platform-driver-
> > x86@vger.kernel.org; jiri@resnulli.us
> > Subject: Re: [patch v1] x86/platform/mellanox: introduce support for Mellanox
> > systems platform
> > 
> > On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 07:23:59AM +0000, Vadim Pasternak wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Greg KH [mailto:gregkh@linuxfoundation.org]
> > > > Sent: Monday, September 12, 2016 10:05 AM
> > > > To: Vadim Pasternak <vadimp@mellanox.com>
> > > > Cc: tglx@linutronix.de; mingo@redhat.com; hpa@zytor.com;
> > > > davem@davemloft.net; geert@linux-m68k.org;
> > > > akpm@linux-foundation.org; kvalo@codeaurora.org; mchehab@kernel.org;
> > > > linux@roeck-us.net; x86@kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
> > > > platform-driver- x86@vger.kernel.org; jiri@resnulli.us
> > > > Subject: Re: [patch v1] x86/platform/mellanox: introduce support for
> > > > Mellanox systems platform
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 06:44:03AM +0000, Vadim Pasternak wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > From: Greg KH [mailto:gregkh@linuxfoundation.org]
> > > > > > Sent: Monday, September 12, 2016 9:13 AM
> > > > > > To: Vadim Pasternak <vadimp@mellanox.com>
> > > > > > Cc: tglx@linutronix.de; mingo@redhat.com; hpa@zytor.com;
> > > > > > davem@davemloft.net; geert@linux-m68k.org;
> > > > > > akpm@linux-foundation.org; kvalo@codeaurora.org;
> > > > > > mchehab@kernel.org; linux@roeck-us.net; x86@kernel.org;
> > > > > > linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
> > > > > > platform-driver- x86@vger.kernel.org; jiri@resnulli.us
> > > > > > Subject: Re: [patch v1] x86/platform/mellanox: introduce support
> > > > > > for Mellanox systems platform
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 06:29:58AM +0000, vadimp@mellanox.com
> > wrote:
> > > > > > > From: Vadim Pasternak <vadimp@mellanox.com>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Enable system support for the Mellanox Technologies platform,
> > > > > > > which provides support for the next Mellanox basic systems:
> > > > > > > "msx6710", "msx6720", "msb7700", "msn2700", "msx1410",
> > > > > > > "msn2410", "msb7800", "msn2740", "msn2100" and also various
> > > > > > > number of derivative systems from the above basic types.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > What does "system support" mean?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Why can't this just be a "normal" PCI driver, as you are just
> > > > > > accessing a PCI device and doing something with it, seems odd to
> > > > > > claim it is a
> > > > "platform" driver.
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > This driver also activates probes to create i2c platform driver and muxes.
> > > >
> > > > And how does it do that?  Through the PCI device?
> > > >
> > > > > For ARM and PPC based systems I can activate such stuff through dts.
> > > > > To be honest I don't know what is the right way to do such things
> > > > > for
> > > > > x86 systems.
> > > >
> > > > How is it found in a x86 system, in ACPI?
> > > >
> > >
> > > We have no support in ACPI.
> > > Currently it could be found through DMI.
> > >
> > > > > If I will move PCI related stuff to separate driver, could you
> > > > > suggest some right location for that?
> > > >
> > > > Depends on what it does.
> > >
> > > It creates platform i2c driver (Mellanox controller), like:
> > > platform_device_register_simple("i2c_mlxcpld", -1,
> > >                                                          NULL, 0); And
> > > two mux platform device instances, like:
> > > platform_device_register_resndata(dev,
> > >                                                 " i2c-mux-reg", i, NULL,
> > >                                                 0, &mlxplat_mux_data[i],
> > >
> > > sizeof(mlxplat_mux_data[i]));
> > 
> > Ugh.  Really?  These aren't on a real bus?  What is this, the 1990's?
> 
> Actually this is 2015-2016.
> Many switches use i2c virtual buses infrastructure for placing slow
> devices for system monitoring and control.

Yes, but that i2c controller is on what type of bus?  A non-discoverable
one?  That's what I'm complaining about...

thanks,

greg k-h