From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Pantelis Antoniou <pantelis.antoniou@konsulko.com>,
Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RFC] fs: Possible filp_open race experiment
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2017 14:17:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170131131759.GA24789@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170131125814.GB5298@lst.de>
On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 01:58:14PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 11:21:02AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> >
> > -next isn't Linus's tree, sometimes stuff sits in there for years :)
> >
> > Anyway, if this is a configfs issue, Christoph and Joel can take a look
> > at it. Any reason you didn't cc: Joel as well (the MAINTAINERS file is
> > your friend...)
>
> It's really a mismatched assumption. The configfs binary file
> code just chunks updates up into a buffer, which only gets flushed
> at ->release time. If we'd move that to ->flush the issue Marek reports
> would be fixed.
>
> But I don't think we want that - triggering a filp_open from the update
> of a _binary_ attribute for a start is wrong. And second doing this
> using ->fs of a random calling process is bound to cause problems.
>
> I think he is using the wrong kind of interface for the job.
Ah, that's why no one has seen this before :)
So, the DT overlay code needs to be fixed...
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-31 13:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20170117231600.10186-1-marex@denx.de>
2017-01-31 5:29 ` Marek Vasut
2017-01-31 7:05 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2017-01-31 10:08 ` Marek Vasut
2017-01-31 10:21 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2017-01-31 12:58 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-01-31 13:17 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2017-01-31 20:46 ` Marek Vasut
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170131131759.GA24789@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jlbec@evilplan.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marex@denx.de \
--cc=pantelis.antoniou@konsulko.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome