From: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
hch@lst.de, Pantelis Antoniou <pantelis.antoniou@konsulko.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RFC] fs: Possible filp_open race experiment
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2017 11:08:05 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c79d4ad1-e874-648f-7e6e-dc15086aa7d7@denx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170131070511.GB5149@kroah.com>
On 01/31/2017 08:05 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 06:29:36AM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> +CC Greg, LKML as I don't quite know where this should go.
>
> You do know about linux-fsdevel, right?
No, wasn't aware of it, sorry.
>> On 01/18/2017 12:16 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>> I believe there is a possible race condition when configfs attributes
>>> trigger filp_open() from the kernel. I initially observed the problem
>>> on Linux 4.4 when loading DT overlay , which in turn loads a driver
>>> which loads firmware. After some further investigation, I came up with
>>> the following minimal-ish example patch, which can trigger the same
>>> behavior on Linux 4.10-rc4 (next 20170117).
>
> What in-kernel code causes this problem? I didn't think DT overlays
> were a feature in 4.4, are you running with code that isn't in the
> normal releases?
No, it happens in -next as well. I believe if write into configfs binary
attribute triggers filp_open(), the kernel will crash.
>>> The core of the demo is in cfs_over_item_dtbo_write(), which just checks
>>> for valid current->fs . This function is triggered by writing data into
>>> configfs binary attribute, ie.:
>
> Why are you caring about current->fs?
Because that is what's NULL and is referenced (in set_root_rcu()) when
the configfs binary attribute is written and triggers filp_open() .
>>> $ mkdir /sys/kernel/config/test/overlays/1/dtbo
>>> $ cat file_17201_bytes_long > /sys/kernel/config/test/overlays/1/dtbo
>>>
>>> I believe the 'cat' program exits quickly and thus calls fs_exit()
>>> before the cfs_over_item_dtbo_write() is called.
>
> How can exit be called before write?
I believe the exit happens after write, but this function
cfs_over_item_dtbo_write() is entered only after the fs_exit().
>>> Any attempts to
>>> access FS (like ie. loading firmware from FS) from that function will
>>> therefore fail (by crashing the kernel, NULL pointer dereference in
>>> set_root_rcu() in fs/namei.c).
>>>
>>> On the other hand, replacing 'cat' with 'dd' yields different result:
>>>
>>> $ dd if=file_17201_bytes_long of=/sys/kernel/config/test/overlays/1/dtbo
>>>
>>> The kernel does not crash. I believe this is because dd takes slightly
>>> longer to complete, so the cfs_over_item_dtbo_write() can complete
>>> before the dd process gets to calling fs_exit() and so the filesystem
>>> access is still available, thus current->fs is valid.
>
> cat and dd act differently, if you strace them, it should show the
> differences, perhaps you can narrow it down there?
I can try.
>>> Note that when using DT overlays (whose configfs interface is not yet
>>> mainline),
>
> Ah, we can't do anything about code that is not merged, perhaps it is
> just buggy? :)
The configfs stuff is in -next , how is it not merged ? The code below
is an example that triggers the problem.
>>> there can easily be a device which requires a firmware in
>>> the DT overlay. Such device will invoke firmware load, which uses the
>>> filp_open() and will thus trigger the behavior above. Depending on
>>> whether one uses dd or cat, the kernel will either crash or not.
>>>
>>> Any ideas ?
>
> I think you need to fix your device tree overlay code...
This is not related to DTO, I only use that to trigger the problem.
--
Best regards,
Marek Vasut
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-31 10:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20170117231600.10186-1-marex@denx.de>
2017-01-31 5:29 ` Marek Vasut
2017-01-31 7:05 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2017-01-31 10:08 ` Marek Vasut [this message]
2017-01-31 10:21 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2017-01-31 12:58 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-01-31 13:17 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2017-01-31 20:46 ` Marek Vasut
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c79d4ad1-e874-648f-7e6e-dc15086aa7d7@denx.de \
--to=marex@denx.de \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pantelis.antoniou@konsulko.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®