From: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"H . J . Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>,
Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.com>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Michael Davidson <md@google.com>,
Greg Hackmann <ghackmann@google.com>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
Stephen Hines <srhines@google.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Bernhard.Rosenkranzer@linaro.org,
Peter Foley <pefoley2@pefoley.com>,
Behan Webster <behanw@converseincode.com>,
Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>,
Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] x86/build: Use cc-option-no-kbuild for boot code compiler options
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 17:55:30 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170613005531.77656-3-mka@chromium.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170613005531.77656-1-mka@chromium.org>
cc-option uses KBUILD_CFLAGS and KBUILD_CPPFLAGS when checking if a
compiler option is available. These flags aren't used to build the boot
code, in consequence cc-option can yield wrong results. For example
-mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 is never set with a 64 bit compiler,
since the setting is only valid for 16 and 32 bit binaries. This
is also the case for 32 bit kernel builds, because the option -m32 is
added to KBUILD_CFLAGS after the assignment of REALMODE_CFLAGS.
Use cc-option-no-kbuild instead of cc-option for the boot mode options.
The macro receives the compiler options as parameter instead of using
KBUILD_C*FLAGS. For the boot code we pass REALMODE_CFLAGS.
Also use separate statements for the cc-option-no-kbuild checks instead
of performing them in the initial assignment of REALMODE_CFLAGS since
the variable is an input of the macro.
Signed-off-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>
---
arch/x86/Makefile | 9 +++++----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/Makefile b/arch/x86/Makefile
index bf240b920473..86b725d69423 100644
--- a/arch/x86/Makefile
+++ b/arch/x86/Makefile
@@ -24,10 +24,11 @@ REALMODE_CFLAGS := $(M16_CFLAGS) -g -Os -D__KERNEL__ \
-DDISABLE_BRANCH_PROFILING \
-Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -march=i386 -mregparm=3 \
-fno-strict-aliasing -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-pic \
- -mno-mmx -mno-sse \
- $(call cc-option, -ffreestanding) \
- $(call cc-option, -fno-stack-protector) \
- $(call cc-option, -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2)
+ -mno-mmx -mno-sse
+
+REALMODE_CFLAGS += $(call cc-option-no-kbuild, $(REALMODE_CFLAGS), -ffreestanding)
+REALMODE_CFLAGS += $(call cc-option-no-kbuild, $(REALMODE_CFLAGS), -fno-stack-protector)
+REALMODE_CFLAGS += $(call cc-option-no-kbuild, $(REALMODE_CFLAGS), -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2)
export REALMODE_CFLAGS
# BITS is used as extension for files which are available in a 32 bit
--
2.13.1.508.gb3defc5cc-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-06-13 0:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-06-13 0:55 [PATCH 0/3] x86: stack alignment for boot code and clang Matthias Kaehlcke
2017-06-13 0:55 ` [PATCH 1/3] kbuild: Add cc-option-no-kbuild macro Matthias Kaehlcke
2017-06-13 7:49 ` Michal Marek
2017-06-13 8:31 ` Arnd Bergmann
2017-06-13 10:13 ` Masahiro Yamada
2017-06-13 16:45 ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2017-06-13 0:55 ` Matthias Kaehlcke [this message]
2017-06-13 0:55 ` [PATCH 3/3] x86/build: Specify stack alignment for clang Matthias Kaehlcke
2017-06-13 6:38 ` Ingo Molnar
2017-06-13 17:25 ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2017-06-13 6:39 ` [PATCH 0/3] x86: stack alignment for boot code and clang Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170613005531.77656-3-mka@chromium.org \
--to=mka@chromium.org \
--cc=Bernhard.Rosenkranzer@linaro.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=behanw@converseincode.com \
--cc=dianders@chromium.org \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=ghackmann@google.com \
--cc=hjl.tools@gmail.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=md@google.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mmarek@suse.com \
--cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
--cc=pefoley2@pefoley.com \
--cc=srhines@google.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yamada.masahiro@socionext.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®