mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Michael Bringmann <mwb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, nfont@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] workqueue: Fix edge cases for calc of pool's cpumask
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2017 16:46:32 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170727204632.GL742618@devbig577.frc2.facebook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7c21c88d-6ce3-ae1a-d257-3042efa1bddf@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

Hello, Michael.

On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 03:15:47PM -0500, Michael Bringmann wrote:
> There is an underlying assumption in many layers / modules of the Linux
> system that CPU <-> node mapping is static.  This is despite the presence
> of features like NUMA and 'hotplug' that support the dynamic addition/
> removal of fundamental system resources like CPUs and memory.  PowerPC
> systems, however, do provide extensive features for the dynamic change
> of resources available to a system.

The text can go as-is but keeping cpu <-> node mapping static is a
trade-off rather than upper layers missing out something.  Making cpu
<-> node mapping dynamic means adding complexities and overhead to a
lot hotter paths including memory allocation.  It's just a better
trade off to keep the mapping static from arch side even if that means
we have to use more complex mapping in arch and/or allocate more
possible cpus than strictly necessary.

> Currently, there is little or no synchronization protection around the
> updating of the CPU <-> node mapping, and the export/update of this
> information for other layers / modules.  In systems which can change 
> this mapping during 'hotplug', like PowerPC, the information is changing 
> underneath all layers that might reference it.
> 
> This patch attempts to ensure that a valid, usable cpumask attribute is
> used by the workqueue infrastructure when setting up new resource pools.
> It prevents a crash that has been observed when an 'empty' cpumask is
> passed along to the worker/task scheduling code.  It is intended as an
> intermediate fix until a more fundamental review and correction of the
> issue can be done.

Thanks a lot for your patience!  Much appreciated.

-- 
tejun

  reply	other threads:[~2017-07-27 20:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-07-27 18:15 Michael Bringmann
2017-07-27 18:31 ` Tejun Heo
2017-07-27 19:07   ` Michael Bringmann
2017-07-27 19:24     ` Tejun Heo
2017-07-27 20:15       ` Michael Bringmann
2017-07-27 20:46         ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2017-07-27 18:42 ` Nathan Fontenot
2017-07-27 19:12   ` Michael Bringmann
2017-07-27 19:24     ` Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170727204632.GL742618@devbig577.frc2.facebook.com \
    --to=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mwb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=nfont@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®