From: Nathan Fontenot <nfont@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Michael Bringmann <mwb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] workqueue: Fix edge cases for calc of pool's cpumask
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2017 13:42:16 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47ac4fb9-a316-0125-7d4e-73cf602d891e@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5c421712-fb38-3020-d3fc-b9bdea792cd3@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On 07/27/2017 01:15 PM, Michael Bringmann wrote:
>
> On NUMA systems with dynamic processors, the content of the cpumask
> may change over time. As new processors are added via DLPAR operations,
> workqueues are created for them. Depending upon the order in which CPUs
> are added/removed, we may run into problems with the content of the
> cpumask used by the workqueues. This patch deals with situations where
> the online cpumask for a node is a proper superset of possible cpumask
> for the node. It also deals with edge cases where the order in which
> CPUs are removed/added from the online cpumask may leave the set for a
> node empty, and require execution by CPUs on another node.
>
> In these and other cases, the patch attempts to ensure that a valid,
> usable cpumask is used to set up newly created pools for workqueues.
> This patch provides a fix for NUMA systems which can add/subtract
> processors dynamically. The patch is expected to be an intermediate
> one while developers search for any underlying issues.
>
> [With additions to the patch provided by Tejun Hao <tj@kernel.org>]
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael Bringmann <mwb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> Changes in V6:
> -- Update descriptive text
> ---
> kernel/workqueue.c | 7 +++++++
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
> index c74bf39..6b6d540 100644
> --- a/kernel/workqueue.c
> +++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
> @@ -3577,6 +3577,13 @@ static bool wq_calc_node_cpumask(const struct workqueue_attrs *attrs, int node,
>
> /* yeap, return possible CPUs in @node that @attrs wants */
> cpumask_and(cpumask, attrs->cpumask, wq_numa_possible_cpumask[node]);
> +
> + if (cpumask_empty(cpumask)) {
> + pr_warn_once("WARNING: workqueue cpumask: onl intersect > "
^^^
This message doesn't seem right, or I am missing something, "onl"?
-Nathan
> + "possible intersect\n");
> + return false;
> + }
> +
> return !cpumask_equal(cpumask, attrs->cpumask);
>
> use_dfl:
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-07-27 18:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-27 18:15 Michael Bringmann
2017-07-27 18:31 ` Tejun Heo
2017-07-27 19:07 ` Michael Bringmann
2017-07-27 19:24 ` Tejun Heo
2017-07-27 20:15 ` Michael Bringmann
2017-07-27 20:46 ` Tejun Heo
2017-07-27 18:42 ` Nathan Fontenot [this message]
2017-07-27 19:12 ` Michael Bringmann
2017-07-27 19:24 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47ac4fb9-a316-0125-7d4e-73cf602d891e@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=nfont@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mwb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®