mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Cc: John Keeping <john@metanate.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Bard Liao <bardliao@realtek.com>,
	Oder Chiou <oder_chiou@realtek.com>,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
	Jaroslav Kysela <perex@perex.cz>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.com>,
	alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: rt5677: Reintroduce I2C device IDs
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2017 15:33:23 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170825193323.GO2827@bill-the-cat> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1503679371.25945.110.camel@linux.intel.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3450 bytes --]

On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 07:42:51PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Fri, 2017-08-25 at 17:05 +0100, John Keeping wrote:
> > On Fri, 25 Aug 2017 10:24:26 -0400, Tom Rini wrote:
> > > On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 04:56:47PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> 
> > > > Apparently you are the one who tested the commit
> > > > 	89128534f925 ("ASoC: rt5677: Add ACPI support")
> > > > year ago.  
> > > 
> > > Yes.
> > > 
> > > > The commit states that ACPI properties that are used in Chromebook
> > > > Pixel
> > > > 2015 is non-standard (not the same as for DT).
> > > > 
> > > > However, DSDT shows the opposite!  
> > > 
> > > Interesting.  I'm not an ACPI person, I just tested what John came
> > > up
> > > with.
> > 
> > And the patch adding this was the first (and still only) time I've
> > really looked at ACPI, so it's quite possible that I misunderstood
> > something at the time.
> 
> Maybe.
> 
> > From memory, I think the particular problem I was referring to in the
> > commit message was that certain GPIOs were only defined by index and
> > not
> > by property name (specifically "plug-det-gpios", "mic-present-gpios"
> > and
> > "headphone-enable-gpios"), and having dumped DSDT just now I do not
> > see
> > those strings appearing anywhere.
> 
> Exactly, and this part of the patch I'm _not_ talking about (it's pretty
> much good and working).
> 
> What I'm talking about is a specific function called
> 
> rt5677_read_acpi_properties()
> 
> in the rt5677.c codec driver.
> 
> The question is do we have _real publicly available_ hardware with that
> kind of properties?
> 
> Because now it's a mess (wrt to real DSDT attached to the thread).
> 
> The proposed change to fix this is like
> 
> diff --git a/sound/soc/codecs/rt5677.c b/sound/soc/codecs/rt5677.c
> index 6448b7a00203..28bde5f50ed9 100644
> --- a/sound/soc/codecs/rt5677.c
> +++ b/sound/soc/codecs/rt5677.c
> @@ -5145,20 +5145,18 @@ static int rt5677_i2c_probe(struct i2c_client
> *i2c)
>  		match_id = of_match_device(rt5677_of_match, &i2c->dev);
>  		if (match_id)
>  			rt5677->type = (enum rt5677_type)match_id-
> >data;
> -
> -		rt5677_read_device_properties(rt5677, &i2c->dev);
>  	} else if (ACPI_HANDLE(&i2c->dev)) {
>  		const struct acpi_device_id *acpi_id;
>  
>  		acpi_id = acpi_match_device(rt5677_acpi_match, &i2c-
> >dev);
>  		if (acpi_id)
>  			rt5677->type = (enum rt5677_type)acpi_id-
> >driver_data;
> -
> -		rt5677_read_acpi_properties(rt5677, &i2c->dev);
>  	} else {
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  	}
>  
> +	rt5677_read_device_properties(rt5677, &i2c->dev);
> +
>  	/* pow-ldo2 and reset are optional. The codec pins may be
> statically
>  	 * connected on the board without gpios. If the gpio device
> property
>  	 * isn't specified, devm_gpiod_get_optional returns NULL.
> 
> + removing rt5677_read_acpi_properties() completely.
> 
> Tom, if you can test it (basic test + might be quality of sound) on your
> Chromebook, it would be nice!

OK.  I did the above manually (on top of the correct fix for the problem
I originally reported from asoc-next), also removed
rt5677_read_acpi_properties and gave the various THX/Dolby sound tests a
spin and they sound good.

As an unrelated request for help, the headphone jack isn't automatically
detected and used, but I assume this is a user configuration issue.
This is unchanged with your patch :)

-- 
Tom

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]

      parent reply	other threads:[~2017-08-25 19:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-08-23  1:51 Tom Rini
2017-08-23  9:28 ` Mark Brown
2017-08-23 22:35   ` Tom Rini
2017-08-23 22:47     ` Mark Brown
2017-08-23 22:54       ` Tom Rini
2017-08-23 23:15         ` Mark Brown
2017-08-23 23:02       ` Mark Brown
2017-08-23 14:29 ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-08-23 17:39   ` Tom Rini
2017-08-24  0:05     ` Tom Rini
2017-08-24  7:39       ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-08-24 11:15         ` Tom Rini
2017-08-24 12:26           ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-08-24 13:41             ` Mark Brown
2017-08-24 13:47             ` Tom Rini
2017-08-24 14:28       ` [alsa-devel] " Takashi Iwai
2017-08-24 14:31         ` Takashi Iwai
2017-08-24 14:41           ` Tom Rini
2017-08-24 15:42             ` Takashi Iwai
2017-08-24 15:52               ` Mark Brown
2017-08-24 15:54                 ` Takashi Iwai
2017-08-24 15:54                 ` Tom Rini
2017-08-24 16:06                   ` Takashi Iwai
2017-08-24 16:08                     ` Tom Rini
2017-08-24 17:16                     ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-08-24 17:44                       ` Takashi Iwai
2017-08-25 13:48                         ` Mark Brown
2017-08-25 13:09                     ` Mark Brown
2017-08-25 13:17                       ` Takashi Iwai
2017-08-25 13:56 ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-08-25 14:24   ` Tom Rini
2017-08-25 14:49     ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-08-25 16:05     ` John Keeping
2017-08-25 16:42       ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-08-25 17:09         ` John Keeping
2017-08-25 19:33         ` Tom Rini [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170825193323.GO2827@bill-the-cat \
    --to=trini@konsulko.com \
    --cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=bardliao@realtek.com \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=john@metanate.com \
    --cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=oder_chiou@realtek.com \
    --cc=perex@perex.cz \
    --cc=tiwai@suse.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome