Re: [PATCH 4/5] staging: fsl-dpaa2/eth: Change RX buffer alignment

[Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>]

On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 02:44:37PM +0000, Bogdan Purcareata wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Dan Carpenter [mailto:dan.carpenter@oracle.com]
> > Sent: Friday, October 27, 2017 5:30 PM
> > To: Bogdan Purcareata <bogdan.purcareata@nxp.com>
> > Cc: Ruxandra Ioana Radulescu <ruxandra.radulescu@nxp.com>;
> > gregkh@linuxfoundation.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
> > devel@driverdev.osuosl.org
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] staging: fsl-dpaa2/eth: Change RX buffer alignment
> > 
> > On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 02:11:35PM +0000, Bogdan Purcareata wrote:
> > > @@ -93,10 +100,10 @@
> > >   * buffers large enough to allow building an skb around them and also
> > account
> > >   * for alignment restrictions
> > >   */
> > > -#define DPAA2_ETH_BUF_RAW_SIZE \
> > > +#define DPAA2_ETH_BUF_RAW_SIZE(priv) \
> > >  	(DPAA2_ETH_RX_BUF_SIZE + \
> > >  	SKB_DATA_ALIGN(sizeof(struct skb_shared_info)) + \
> > > -	DPAA2_ETH_RX_BUF_ALIGN)
> > > +	(priv)->rx_buf_align)
> > >
> > 
> > Not related to this patch, but this macro is ugly.  It would be better
> > as function.
> 
> Okay, will change the macros to inline functions in v2, where applicable.
> 

You didn't need to do that, because I said it was "not related to this
change".  I try not to make people redo paches for stuff like this.  But
thanks, it looks nicer now.

regards,
dan carpenter