From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bpetkov@suse.de>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/18] Entry stack switching
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2017 07:36:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171122063636.wib53q255n4spa5s@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171122062257.ivp5fbcy2k4mlfdm@gmail.com>
* Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> * Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> > This sets up stack switching, including for SYSCALL. I think it's
> > in decent shape.
> >
> > Known issues:
> > - I think we're going to want a way to turn the stack switching on and
> > off either at boot time or at runtime. It should be fairly straightforward
> > to make it work.
> >
> > - I think the ORC unwinder isn't so good at dealing with stack overflows.
> > It bails too early (I think), resulting in lots of ? entries. This
> > isn't a regression with this series -- it's just something that could
> > be improved.
> >
> > Ingo, patch 1 may be tip/urgent material. It fixes what I think is
> > a bug in Xen. I'm having a hard time testing because it's being
> > masked by a bigger unrelated bug that's keeping Xen from booting
> > when configured to hit the bug I'm fixing. (The latter bug goes at
> > least back to v4.13, I think I know roughtly what's wrong, and I've
> > reported it to the maintainers.)
>
> Hm, with this series the previous IRQ vector bug appears again:
>
> [ 51.156370] do_IRQ: 16.34 No irq handler for vector
> [ 57.511030] do_IRQ: 16.34 No irq handler for vector
> [ 57.528335] do_IRQ: 16.34 No irq handler for vector
> [ 57.533256] do_IRQ: 16.34 No irq handler for vector
> [ 63.991913] do_IRQ: 16.34 No irq handler for vector
> [ 63.996810] do_IRQ: 16.34 No irq handler for vector
>
> I've attached the reproducer config. Note that the system appears to be working to
> a certain extent (I could ssh to it and extract its config), but produces these
> warnings sporadically.
>
> Also note that this is the same AMD system tha had irq-tracing/lockdep troubles
> yesterday. So maybe this warning is related and we either have broken lockdep, or
> these IRQ vector warnings.
Yeah, so I just double checked, if from the latest series I revert:
x86/entry/64: Fix entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe() IRQ tracing
then I (no surprise) get the bootup lockdep warning - but don't get the IRQ vector
warnings.
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-22 6:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-22 4:43 Andy Lutomirski
2017-11-22 4:43 ` [PATCH v2 01/18] x86/entry/64: Fix entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe IRQ tracing Andy Lutomirski
2017-11-22 5:35 ` Ingo Molnar
2017-11-22 7:45 ` [tip:x86/urgent] x86/entry/64: Fix entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe() " tip-bot for Andy Lutomirski
2017-11-22 4:43 ` [PATCH v2 02/18] x86/asm/64: Allocate and enable the SYSENTER stack Andy Lutomirski
2017-11-22 4:43 ` [PATCH v2 03/18] x86/dumpstack: Add get_stack_info() support for " Andy Lutomirski
2017-11-22 12:10 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-11-22 4:43 ` [PATCH v2 04/18] x86/gdt: Put per-cpu GDT remaps in ascending order Andy Lutomirski
2017-11-22 11:05 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-11-22 15:26 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-11-22 4:44 ` [PATCH v2 05/18] x86/fixmap: Generalize the GDT fixmap mechanism Andy Lutomirski
2017-11-22 15:33 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-11-22 17:16 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-11-22 17:32 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-11-23 15:24 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-11-23 19:24 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-11-22 4:44 ` [PATCH v2 06/18] x86/kasan/64: Teach KASAN about the cpu_entry_area Andy Lutomirski
2017-11-22 6:19 ` Ingo Molnar
2017-11-22 9:05 ` Andrey Ryabinin
2017-11-22 15:22 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-11-23 10:08 ` Andrey Ryabinin
2017-11-23 15:22 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-11-22 4:44 ` [PATCH v2 07/18] x86/asm: Fix assumptions that the HW TSS is at the beginning of cpu_tss Andy Lutomirski
2017-11-22 19:06 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-11-22 4:44 ` [PATCH v2 08/18] x86/dumpstack: Handle stack overflow on all stacks Andy Lutomirski
2017-11-23 11:19 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-11-22 4:44 ` [PATCH v2 09/18] x86/asm: Move SYSENTER_stack to the beginning of struct tss_struct Andy Lutomirski
2017-11-23 12:00 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-11-23 13:16 ` Denys Vlasenko
2017-11-23 15:02 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-11-23 19:30 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-11-22 4:44 ` [PATCH v2 10/18] x86/asm: Remap the TSS into the cpu entry area Andy Lutomirski
2017-11-23 19:32 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-11-23 19:55 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-11-23 20:15 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-11-23 20:37 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-11-24 2:40 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-11-24 4:17 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-11-22 4:44 ` [PATCH v2 11/18] x86/asm/64: Separate cpu_current_top_of_stack from TSS.sp0 Andy Lutomirski
2017-11-23 19:34 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-11-22 4:44 ` [PATCH v2 12/18] x86/espfix/64: Stop assuming that pt_regs is on the entry stack Andy Lutomirski
2017-11-23 19:36 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-11-22 4:44 ` [PATCH v2 13/18] x86/asm/64: Use a percpu trampoline stack for IDT entries Andy Lutomirski
2017-11-23 23:44 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-11-24 4:14 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-11-22 4:44 ` [PATCH v2 14/18] x86/asm/64: Return to userspace from the trampoline stack Andy Lutomirski
2017-11-22 4:44 ` [PATCH v2 15/18] x86/entry/64: Create a percpu SYSCALL entry trampoline Andy Lutomirski
2017-11-22 4:44 ` [PATCH v2 16/18] x86/irq: Remove an old outdated comment about context tracking races Andy Lutomirski
2017-11-22 4:44 ` [PATCH v2 17/18] x86/irq/64: In the stack overflow warning, print the offending IP Andy Lutomirski
2017-11-22 4:44 ` [PATCH v2 18/18] x86/entry/64: Move the IST stacks into cpu_entry_area Andy Lutomirski
2017-11-22 6:22 ` [PATCH v2 00/18] Entry stack switching Ingo Molnar
2017-11-22 6:36 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2017-11-22 16:23 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-11-23 6:21 ` Ingo Molnar
2017-11-23 6:44 ` Ingo Molnar
2017-11-23 6:58 ` Ingo Molnar
2017-11-23 15:29 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-11-23 16:41 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-11-22 7:39 ` WARNING: can't dereference registers at ffffc90004dfff60 for ip error_entry+0x7d/0xd0 (Re: [PATCH v2 00/18] Entry stack switching) Ingo Molnar
2017-11-22 7:43 ` Ingo Molnar
2017-11-22 13:55 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-11-22 15:19 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-11-22 15:56 ` Ingo Molnar
2017-11-22 16:35 ` Andy Lutomirski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171122063636.wib53q255n4spa5s@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=bpetkov@suse.de \
--cc=brgerst@gmail.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome