mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
To: "Woodhouse, David" <dwmw@amazon.co.uk>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Amit Shah <aams@amazon.de>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>, Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linux-foundation.org>,
	Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@google.com>, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
	Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org>,
	gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 10/10] x86/retpoline: Exclude objtool with retpoline
Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2018 07:20:07 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180108132007.c7snxdhaxi4crg5p@treble> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1515407640.7317.27.camel@amazon.co.uk>

On Mon, Jan 08, 2018 at 10:34:00AM +0000, Woodhouse, David wrote:
> On Mon, 2018-01-08 at 11:25 +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Sun, 7 Jan 2018, David Woodhouse wrote:
> > 
> > Cc+ Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
> > 
> > Sigh....
> > 
> > > From: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
> > > 
> > > objtool's assembler nanny currently cannot deal with the code generated
> > > by the retpoline compiler and throws hundreds of warnings, mostly
> > > because it sees calls that don't have a symbolic target.
> > > 
> > > Exclude all the options that rely on objtool when RETPOLINE is active.
> > > 
> > > This mainly means that we use the frame pointer unwinder and livepatch
> > > is not supported.
> > > 
> > > Eventually objtool can be fixed to handle this.
> 
> I believe Josh is on vacation and I've asked Amit to take a look at
> this, at least as far as ensuring that it doesn't actually disable
> kpatch.

I'm back now and will start looking at it this week.

For future revisions of the patch set, can you add me to CC?  And also
it would be good to add x86@kernel.org as I'm sure the other x86
maintainers (mingo and hpa) want to see these patches.

-- 
Josh

  reply	other threads:[~2018-01-08 13:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 66+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-01-07 22:11 [PATCH v6 00/10] Retpoline: Avoid speculative indirect calls in kernel David Woodhouse
2018-01-07 22:11 ` [PATCH v6 01/10] x86/retpoline: Add initial retpoline support David Woodhouse
2018-01-08 10:45   ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-08 10:53     ` David Woodhouse
2018-01-08 11:03       ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-08 12:45         ` David Woodhouse
2018-01-08 13:42   ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-01-08 13:46     ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-01-08 13:53       ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-01-08 14:26         ` David Woodhouse
2018-01-08 21:20           ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-01-09 12:36       ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-09 13:35         ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-01-09 13:40         ` Woodhouse, David
2018-01-07 22:11 ` [PATCH v6 02/10] x86/retpoline/crypto: Convert crypto assembler indirect jumps David Woodhouse
2018-01-08 13:49   ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-01-07 22:11 ` [PATCH v6 03/10] x86/retpoline/entry: Convert entry " David Woodhouse
2018-01-07 22:11 ` [PATCH v6 04/10] x86/retpoline/ftrace: Convert ftrace " David Woodhouse
2018-01-07 22:11 ` [PATCH v6 05/10] x86/retpoline/hyperv: Convert " David Woodhouse
2018-01-07 22:11 ` [PATCH v6 06/10] x86/retpoline/xen: Convert Xen hypercall " David Woodhouse
2018-01-07 22:11 ` [PATCH v6 07/10] x86/retpoline/checksum32: Convert assembler " David Woodhouse
2018-01-07 22:11 ` [PATCH v6 08/10] x86/retpoline/irq32: " David Woodhouse
2018-01-07 22:11 ` [PATCH v6 09/10] x86/retpoline: Add boot time option to disable retpoline David Woodhouse
2018-01-07 22:11 ` [PATCH v6 10/10] x86/retpoline: Exclude objtool with retpoline David Woodhouse
2018-01-08 10:25   ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-01-08 10:34     ` Woodhouse, David
2018-01-08 13:20       ` Josh Poimboeuf [this message]
2018-01-07 22:22 ` [PATCH v6 00/10] Retpoline: Avoid speculative indirect calls in kernel Linus Torvalds
2018-01-08 10:01   ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-01-08 17:54   ` Ingo Molnar
2018-01-08 21:10     ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-01-08 10:34 ` Paul Turner
2018-01-08 10:38   ` Jiri Kosina
2018-01-08 10:45     ` Paul Turner
2018-01-08 10:42   ` Paul Turner
2018-01-08 11:16     ` Andrew Cooper
2018-01-08 11:25       ` Paul Turner
2018-01-08 16:13     ` Alexei Starovoitov
2018-01-10 15:20     ` Woodhouse, David
2018-01-10 15:31       ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2018-01-08 10:45   ` David Woodhouse
2018-01-08 10:53     ` Paul Turner
2018-01-08 12:49       ` David Woodhouse
2018-01-08 23:44 ` [PATCH v6 11/10] x86/retpoline: Avoid return buffer underflows on context switch David Woodhouse
2018-01-08 23:56   ` Linus Torvalds
2018-01-08 23:58     ` Woodhouse, David
2018-01-09  0:35       ` Linus Torvalds
2018-01-09  0:42         ` David Woodhouse
2018-01-09  0:48           ` Linus Torvalds
2018-01-09  0:55             ` David Woodhouse
2018-01-09  0:44         ` Andi Kleen
2018-01-09  0:58           ` Linus Torvalds
2018-01-09  1:15             ` Andrew Cooper
2018-01-09  3:27               ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-01-09 13:04                 ` David Woodhouse
2018-01-09 13:10                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-09 17:53                   ` Kees Cook
2018-01-09 18:09                   ` Linus Torvalds
2018-02-16  8:58                   ` Pavel Machek
2018-01-09  1:16             ` Andi Kleen
2018-01-09  1:21               ` [PATCH v6 11/10] x86/retpoline: Avoid return buffer underflows on context switch II Andi Kleen
2018-01-09  1:23                 ` Woodhouse, David
2018-01-09  1:49                   ` Andi Kleen
2018-01-09  1:53                 ` Paul Turner
2018-01-09  1:18             ` [PATCH v6 11/10] x86/retpoline: Avoid return buffer underflows on context switch Woodhouse, David
2018-01-09  0:06     ` Andi Kleen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180108132007.c7snxdhaxi4crg5p@treble \
    --to=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
    --cc=aams@amazon.de \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=dwmw@amazon.co.uk \
    --cc=gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=gregkh@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jikos@kernel.org \
    --cc=keescook@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@amacapital.net \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=pjt@google.com \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®