mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
To: Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@redhat.com>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
	live-patching@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftests/livepatch: introduce tests
Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2018 16:05:49 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180409140549.q6jybx3zirnsl2pp@pathway.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180408154231.ihnglqyya5nric4q@redhat.com>

On Sun 2018-04-08 11:42:31, Joe Lawrence wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 09:36:46PM -0500, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 03:49:48PM -0400, Joe Lawrence wrote:
> > > Add a few livepatch modules and simple target modules that the included
> > > regression suite can run tests against.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@redhat.com>
> > > ---
> > >  lib/Kconfig.debug                                  |  12 +
> > >  lib/Makefile                                       |   2 +
> > >  lib/livepatch/Makefile                             |  18 +
> > >  lib/livepatch/test_klp_atomic_replace.c            |  69 +++
> > >  lib/livepatch/test_klp_callbacks_busy.c            |  43 ++
> > >  lib/livepatch/test_klp_callbacks_demo.c            | 132 ++++++
> > >  lib/livepatch/test_klp_callbacks_demo2.c           | 104 ++++
> > >  lib/livepatch/test_klp_callbacks_mod.c             |  24 +
> > >  lib/livepatch/test_klp_livepatch.c                 |  62 +++
> > >  tools/testing/selftests/Makefile                   |   1 +
> > >  tools/testing/selftests/livepatch/Makefile         |   8 +
> > >  tools/testing/selftests/livepatch/config           |   1 +
> > >  tools/testing/selftests/livepatch/functions.sh     | 202 ++++++++
> > >  .../testing/selftests/livepatch/test-callbacks.sh  | 526 +++++++++++++++++++++
> > >  .../testing/selftests/livepatch/test-livepatch.sh  | 177 +++++++
> > >  .../selftests/livepatch/test-shadow-vars.sh        |  13 +
> > >  16 files changed, 1394 insertions(+)
> > >  create mode 100644 lib/livepatch/Makefile
> > >  create mode 100644 lib/livepatch/test_klp_atomic_replace.c
> > >  create mode 100644 lib/livepatch/test_klp_callbacks_busy.c
> > >  create mode 100644 lib/livepatch/test_klp_callbacks_demo.c
> > >  create mode 100644 lib/livepatch/test_klp_callbacks_demo2.c
> > >  create mode 100644 lib/livepatch/test_klp_callbacks_mod.c
> > >  create mode 100644 lib/livepatch/test_klp_livepatch.c
> > >  create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/livepatch/Makefile
> > >  create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/livepatch/config
> > >  create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/livepatch/functions.sh
> > >  create mode 100755 tools/testing/selftests/livepatch/test-callbacks.sh
> > >  create mode 100755 tools/testing/selftests/livepatch/test-livepatch.sh
> > >  create mode 100755 tools/testing/selftests/livepatch/test-shadow-vars.sh
> > 
> > I love this.  Nice work!
> > 
> > As you and Petr discussed, it would be nice to get rid of some of the
> > delays, and also the callback tests will be very important.
> 
> I've got v2 WIP that minimizes the delays, cleans up build flags, and
> adds a basic shadow variable test.

Sounds great.

> Since these tests are based on top of Petr's current patchsets for
> atomic replace and shadow variables, it probably makes sense for those
> to merge first.  I can post test results to his patchsets if that helps.

Sounds good to me. We could synchronize the merge. But I think that it
will not be a big deal if we would merge the atomic replace slightly
earlier if the tests needed some more love.


> These tests are basically a mash up of some of the tedious callback
> Documentation and shadow variable sample livepatches.  Since there will
> be a lot of duplication, should we just remove redundant doc/samples in
> favor of these tests?

Yup, it does not make sense to maintain two copies of basically
the same modules.

Best Regards,
Petr

  reply	other threads:[~2018-04-09 14:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-03-28 19:49 [PATCH] Add livepatch kselftests Joe Lawrence
2018-03-28 19:49 ` [PATCH] selftests/livepatch: introduce tests Joe Lawrence
2018-03-29 20:42   ` kbuild test robot
2018-04-07  2:36   ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-04-08 15:42     ` Joe Lawrence
2018-04-09 14:05       ` Petr Mladek [this message]
2018-04-10 14:31         ` Miroslav Benes
2018-04-10 17:51           ` Josh Poimboeuf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180409140549.q6jybx3zirnsl2pp@pathway.suse.cz \
    --to=pmladek@suse.com \
    --cc=joe.lawrence@redhat.com \
    --cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=live-patching@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®