From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
"Andy Lutomirski" <luto@kernel.org>,
"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>,
"Rik van Riel" <riel@surriel.com>,
"Dave Hansen" <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/22] x86/fpu: Make get_xsave_field_ptr() and get_xsave_addr() use feature number instead of mask
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2019 19:49:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190128184959.GI20487@zn.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190109114744.10936-12-bigeasy@linutronix.de>
On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 12:47:33PM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> After changing the argument of __raw_xsave_addr() from a mask to number
> Dave suggested to check if it makes sense to do the same for
> get_xsave_addr(). As it turns out it does. Only get_xsave_addr() needs
> the mask to check if the requested feature is part of what is
> support/saved and then uses the number again. The shift operation is
> cheaper compared to "find last bit set". Also, the feature number uses
> less opcode space compared to the mask :)
>
> Make get_xsave_addr() argument a xfeature number instead of mask and fix
> up its callers.
> As part of this use xfeature_nr and xfeature_mask consistently.
Good!
> This results in changes to the kvm code as:
> feature -> xfeature_mask
> index -> xfeature_nr
>
> Suggested-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/xstate.h | 4 ++--
> arch/x86/kernel/fpu/xstate.c | 23 +++++++++++------------
> arch/x86/kernel/traps.c | 2 +-
> arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 28 ++++++++++++++--------------
> arch/x86/mm/mpx.c | 6 +++---
> 5 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/xstate.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/xstate.h
> index 48581988d78c7..fbe41f808e5d8 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/xstate.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/xstate.h
> @@ -46,8 +46,8 @@ extern void __init update_regset_xstate_info(unsigned int size,
> u64 xstate_mask);
>
> void fpu__xstate_clear_all_cpu_caps(void);
> -void *get_xsave_addr(struct xregs_state *xsave, int xstate);
> -const void *get_xsave_field_ptr(int xstate_field);
> +void *get_xsave_addr(struct xregs_state *xsave, int xfeature_nr);
> +const void *get_xsave_field_ptr(int xfeature_nr);
> int using_compacted_format(void);
> int copy_xstate_to_kernel(void *kbuf, struct xregs_state *xsave, unsigned int offset, unsigned int size);
> int copy_xstate_to_user(void __user *ubuf, struct xregs_state *xsave, unsigned int offset, unsigned int size);
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/xstate.c b/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/xstate.c
> index 0e759a032c1c7..d288e4d271b71 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/xstate.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/xstate.c
> @@ -830,15 +830,15 @@ static void *__raw_xsave_addr(struct xregs_state *xsave, int xfeature_nr)
> *
> * Inputs:
> * xstate: the thread's storage area for all FPU data
> - * xstate_feature: state which is defined in xsave.h (e.g.
> - * XFEATURE_MASK_FP, XFEATURE_MASK_SSE, etc...)
> + * xfeature_nr: state which is defined in xsave.h (e.g. XFEATURE_FP,
> + * XFEATURE_SSE, etc...)
> * Output:
> * address of the state in the xsave area, or NULL if the
> * field is not present in the xsave buffer.
> */
> -void *get_xsave_addr(struct xregs_state *xsave, int xstate_feature)
> +void *get_xsave_addr(struct xregs_state *xsave, int xfeature_nr)
> {
> - int xfeature_nr;
> + u64 xfeature_mask = 1ULL << xfeature_nr;
You can paste directly BIT_ULL(xfeature_nr) where you need it in this
function...
> /*
> * Do we even *have* xsave state?
> */
> @@ -850,11 +850,11 @@ void *get_xsave_addr(struct xregs_state *xsave, int xstate_feature)
> * have not enabled. Remember that pcntxt_mask is
> * what we write to the XCR0 register.
> */
> - WARN_ONCE(!(xfeatures_mask & xstate_feature),
> + WARN_ONCE(!(xfeatures_mask & xfeature_mask),
... and turn this into:
WARN_ONCE(!(xfeatures_mask & BIT_ULL(xfeature_nr))
which is more readable than the AND of two variables which I had to
re-focus my eyes to see the difference. :)
Oh and this way, gcc generates better code by doing simply a BT
directly:
# arch/x86/kernel/fpu/xstate.c:852: WARN_ONCE(!(xfeatures_mask & BIT_ULL(xfeature_nr)),
.loc 1 852 2 view .LVU258
movq xfeatures_mask(%rip), %rax # xfeatures_mask, tmp124
btq %rsi, %rax # xfeature_nr, tmp124
without first computing the shift into xfeature_mask:
# arch/x86/kernel/fpu/xstate.c:841: u64 xfeature_mask = 1ULL << xfeature_nr;
.loc 1 841 6 view .LVU249
movl %esi, %ecx # xfeature_nr, tmp120
movl $1, %ebp #, tmp105
salq %cl, %rbp # tmp120, xfeature_mask
and then testing it:
# arch/x86/kernel/fpu/xstate.c:853: WARN_ONCE(!(xfeatures_mask & xfeature_mask),
.loc 1 853 2 view .LVU256
testq %rbp, xfeatures_mask(%rip) # xfeature_mask, xfeatures_mask
movq %rdi, %rbx # xsave, xsave
Otherwise a nice cleanup!
Thx.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-01-28 18:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 91+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-09 11:47 [PATCH v6] x86: load FPU registers on return to userland Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-01-09 11:47 ` [PATCH 01/22] x86/fpu: Remove fpu->initialized usage in __fpu__restore_sig() Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-01-14 16:24 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-02-05 10:08 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-01-09 11:47 ` [PATCH 02/22] x86/fpu: Remove fpu__restore() Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-01-09 11:47 ` [PATCH 03/22] x86/fpu: Remove preempt_disable() in fpu__clear() Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-01-14 18:55 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-01-09 11:47 ` [PATCH 04/22] x86/fpu: Always init the `state' " Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-01-14 19:32 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-01-09 11:47 ` [PATCH 05/22] x86/fpu: Remove fpu->initialized usage in copy_fpstate_to_sigframe() Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-01-16 19:36 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-01-16 22:40 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-01-17 12:22 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-01-18 21:14 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-01-18 21:17 ` Dave Hansen
2019-01-18 21:37 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-01-18 21:43 ` Dave Hansen
2019-01-21 11:21 ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-01-22 13:40 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-01-22 16:15 ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-01-22 17:00 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-02-05 11:34 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-02-05 11:17 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-02-26 16:38 ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-03-08 18:12 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-02-05 14:37 ` [PATCH 05/22 v2] " Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-01-09 11:47 ` [PATCH 06/22] x86/fpu: Don't save fxregs for ia32 frames " Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-01-24 11:17 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-02-05 16:43 ` [PATCH 06/22 v2] x86/fpu: Don't save fxregs for ia32 frames in Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-01-09 11:47 ` [PATCH 07/22] x86/fpu: Remove fpu->initialized Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-01-24 13:34 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-02-05 18:03 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-02-06 14:01 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-02-07 10:13 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-02-07 10:37 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-02-05 18:06 ` [PATCH 07/22 v2] " Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-01-09 11:47 ` [PATCH 08/22] x86/fpu: Remove user_fpu_begin() Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-01-25 15:18 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-02-05 18:16 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-01-09 11:47 ` [PATCH 09/22] x86/fpu: Add (__)make_fpregs_active helpers Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-01-28 18:23 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-02-07 10:43 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-02-13 9:30 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-02-14 14:51 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-01-09 11:47 ` [PATCH 10/22] x86/fpu: Make __raw_xsave_addr() use feature number instead of mask Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-01-28 18:30 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-01-09 11:47 ` [PATCH 11/22] x86/fpu: Make get_xsave_field_ptr() and get_xsave_addr() " Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-01-28 18:49 ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2019-02-07 11:13 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-02-13 9:31 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-01-09 11:47 ` [PATCH 12/22] x86/fpu: Only write PKRU if it is different from current Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-01-23 18:09 ` Dave Hansen
2019-02-07 11:27 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-01-09 11:47 ` [PATCH 13/22] x86/pkeys: Don't check if PKRU is zero before writting it Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-01-09 11:47 ` [PATCH 14/22] x86/fpu: Eager switch PKRU state Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-01-09 11:47 ` [PATCH 15/22] x86/entry: Add TIF_NEED_FPU_LOAD Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-01-30 11:55 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-02-07 11:49 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-02-13 9:35 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-02-14 15:28 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-01-09 11:47 ` [PATCH 16/22] x86/fpu: Always store the registers in copy_fpstate_to_sigframe() Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-01-30 11:43 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-02-07 13:28 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-01-09 11:47 ` [PATCH 17/22] x86/fpu: Prepare copy_fpstate_to_sigframe() for TIF_NEED_FPU_LOAD Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-01-30 11:56 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-01-30 12:28 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-01-30 12:53 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-02-07 14:10 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-01-09 11:47 ` [PATCH 18/22] x86/fpu: Update xstate's PKRU value on write_pkru() Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-01-23 17:28 ` Dave Hansen
2019-01-09 11:47 ` [PATCH 19/22] x86/fpu: Inline copy_user_to_fpregs_zeroing() Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-01-09 11:47 ` [PATCH 20/22] x86/fpu: Let __fpu__restore_sig() restore the !32bit+fxsr frame from kernel memory Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-01-30 21:29 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-01-09 11:47 ` [PATCH 21/22] x86/fpu: Merge the two code paths in __fpu__restore_sig() Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-01-09 11:47 ` [PATCH 22/22] x86/fpu: Defer FPU state load until return to userspace Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-01-31 9:16 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-01-15 12:44 ` [PATCH v6] x86: load FPU registers on return to userland David Laight
2019-01-15 13:15 ` 'Sebastian Andrzej Siewior'
2019-01-15 14:33 ` David Laight
2019-01-15 19:46 ` Dave Hansen
2019-01-15 20:26 ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-01-15 20:54 ` Dave Hansen
2019-01-15 21:11 ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-01-16 10:31 ` David Laight
2019-01-16 10:18 ` David Laight
2019-01-30 11:35 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-01-30 12:06 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-01-30 12:27 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-02-08 13:12 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-02-13 15:54 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-02-21 11:49 [PATCH v7] " Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-02-21 11:50 ` [PATCH 11/22] x86/fpu: Make get_xsave_field_ptr() and get_xsave_addr() use feature number instead of mask Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190128184959.GI20487@zn.tnic \
--to=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=Jason@zx2c4.com \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=riel@surriel.com \
--cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome