From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
x86@kernel.org, Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 15/14] x86/dumpstack/64: Speedup in_exception_stack()
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2019 10:43:29 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190402154329.scp7i7uqevubgwrz@treble> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1904021214340.1676@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
On Tue, Apr 02, 2019 at 12:19:46PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> The current implementation of in_exception_stack() iterates over the
> exception stacks array. Most of the time this is an useless exercise, but
> even for the actual use cases (perf and ftrace) it takes at least 2
> iterations to get to the NMI stack.
>
> As the exception stacks and the guard pages are page aligned the loop can
> be avoided completely.
>
> Add a initial check whether the stack pointer is inside the full exception
> stack area and leave early if not.
>
> Create a lookup table which describes the stack area. The table index is
> the page offset from the beginning of the exception stacks. So for any
> given stack pointer the page offset is computed and a lookup in the
> description table is performed. If it is inside a guard page, return. If
> not, use the descriptor to fill in the info structure.
>
> The table is filled at compile time with nasty macro magic and for the
> !KASAN case the interesting page descriptors exactly fit into a single
> cache line. Just the last guard page descriptor is in the next cacheline,
> but that should not be accessed in the regular case.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_64.c | 97 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> 1 file changed, 66 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
>
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_64.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_64.c
> @@ -48,50 +48,85 @@ const char *stack_type_name(enum stack_t
> return NULL;
> }
>
> -struct estack_layout {
> - unsigned int begin;
> - unsigned int end;
> +#define ESTACK_S(st) \
> + (offsetof(struct cea_exception_stacks, st## _stack))
> +
> +#define ESTACK_E(st) \
> + (offsetof(struct cea_exception_stacks, st## _stack_guard))
> +
> +#define PAGENR(offs) ((offs) / PAGE_SIZE)
> +#define PAGERANGE(st) PAGENR(ESTACK_S(st)) ... PAGENR(ESTACK_E(st) - 1)
> +
> +#if EXCEPTION_STKSZ == PAGE_SIZE
> +# define CONDRANGE(st) PAGENR(ESTACK_S(st))
> +#else
> +# define CONDRANGE(st) PAGERANGE(st)
> +#endif
> +
> +/**
> + * struct estack_pages - Page descriptor for exception stacks
> + * @offs: Offset from the start of the exception stack area
> + * @size: Size of the exception stack
> + * @type: Type to store in the stack_info struct
> + */
> +struct estack_pages {
> + u32 offs;
> + u16 size;
> + u16 type;
> };
>
> -#define ESTACK_ENTRY(x) { \
> - .begin = offsetof(struct cea_exception_stacks, x## _stack), \
> - .end = offsetof(struct cea_exception_stacks, x## _stack_guard) \
> +#define ESTACK_PAGE(ist, est) { \
> + .offs = ESTACK_S(est), \
> + .size = ESTACK_E(est) - ESTACK_S(est), \
> + .type = STACK_TYPE_EXCEPTION + ist, \
> }
>
> -static const struct estack_layout layout[N_EXCEPTION_STACKS] = {
> - [ DOUBLEFAULT_IST ] = ESTACK_ENTRY(DF),
> - [ NMI_IST ] = ESTACK_ENTRY(NMI),
> - [ DEBUG_IST ] = ESTACK_ENTRY(DB),
> - [ MCE_IST ] = ESTACK_ENTRY(MCE),
> +#define ESTACK_PAGES (sizeof(struct cea_exception_stacks) / PAGE_SIZE)
> +
> +/*
> + * Array of exception stack page descriptors. If the stack is larger than
> + * PAGE_SIZE, all pages covering a particular stack will have the same
> + * info.
> + */
> +static const struct estack_pages estack_pages[ESTACK_PAGES] ____cacheline_aligned = {
> + [CONDRANGE(DF)] = ESTACK_PAGE(DOUBLEFAULT_IST, DF),
> + [CONDRANGE(NMI)] = ESTACK_PAGE(NMI_IST, NMI),
> + [PAGERANGE(DB)] = ESTACK_PAGE(DEBUG_IST, DB),
> + [CONDRANGE(MCE)] = ESTACK_PAGE(MCE_IST, MCE),
It would be nice if the *_IST macro naming aligned with the struct
cea_exception_stacks field naming. Then you could just do, e.g.
ESTACKPAGE(DF).
Also it's a bit unfortunate that some of the stack size knowledge is
hard-coded here, i.e #DB always being > 1 page and non-#DB being
sometimes 1 page.
> };
>
> static bool in_exception_stack(unsigned long *stack, struct stack_info *info)
> {
> - unsigned long estacks, begin, end, stk = (unsigned long)stack;
> + unsigned long begin, end, stk = (unsigned long)stack;
> + const struct estack_pages *ep;
> struct pt_regs *regs;
> unsigned int k;
>
> BUILD_BUG_ON(N_EXCEPTION_STACKS != 4);
>
> - estacks = (unsigned long)__this_cpu_read(cea_exception_stacks);
> -
> - for (k = 0; k < N_EXCEPTION_STACKS; k++) {
> - begin = estacks + layout[k].begin;
> - end = estacks + layout[k].end;
> - regs = (struct pt_regs *)end - 1;
> -
> - if (stk <= begin || stk >= end)
> - continue;
> -
> - info->type = STACK_TYPE_EXCEPTION + k;
> - info->begin = (unsigned long *)begin;
> - info->end = (unsigned long *)end;
> - info->next_sp = (unsigned long *)regs->sp;
> -
> - return true;
> - }
> -
> - return false;
> + begin = (unsigned long)__this_cpu_read(cea_exception_stacks);
> + end = begin + sizeof(struct cea_exception_stacks);
> + /* Bail if @stack is outside the exception stack area. */
> + if (stk <= begin || stk >= end)
> + return false;
This check is the most important piece. Exception stack dumps are quite
rare, so this ensures an early exit in most cases regardless of whether
there's a loop below.
> +
> + /* Calc page offset from start of exception stacks */
> + k = (stk - begin) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> + /* Lookup the page descriptor */
> + ep = &estack_pages[k];
> + /* Guard page? */
> + if (unlikely(!ep->size))
> + return false;
> +
> + begin += (unsigned long)ep->offs;
> + end = begin + (unsigned long)ep->size;
> + regs = (struct pt_regs *)end - 1;
> +
> + info->type = ep->type;
> + info->begin = (unsigned long *)begin;
> + info->end = (unsigned long *)end;
> + info->next_sp = (unsigned long *)regs->sp;
> + return true;
With the above "(stk <= begin || stk >= end)" check, removing the loop
becomes not all that important since exception stack dumps are quite
rare and not performance sensitive. With all the macros this code
becomes a little more obtuse, so I'm not sure whether removal of the
loop is a net positive.
> }
>
> static bool in_irq_stack(unsigned long *stack, struct stack_info *info)
--
Josh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-02 15:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-31 21:40 [patch 00/14] x86/exceptions: Add guard patches to IST stacks Thomas Gleixner
2019-03-31 21:40 ` [patch 01/14] x86/irq/64: Limit IST stack overflow check to #DB stack Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-01 18:03 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-04-02 16:34 ` Sean Christopherson
2019-03-31 21:40 ` [patch 02/14] x86/idt: Remove unused macro SISTG Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-01 4:04 ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-03-31 21:40 ` [patch 03/14] x86/exceptions: Remove unused stack defines on 32bit Thomas Gleixner
2019-03-31 21:40 ` [patch 04/14] x86/exceptions: Make IST index zero based Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-01 7:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-04-01 7:33 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-02 16:49 ` Sean Christopherson
2019-04-03 16:35 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-03-31 21:40 ` [patch 05/14] x86/cpu_entry_area: Cleanup setup functions Thomas Gleixner
2019-03-31 21:40 ` [patch 06/14] x86/exceptions: Add structs for exception stacks Thomas Gleixner
2019-03-31 21:40 ` [patch 07/14] x86/cpu_entry_area: Prepare for IST guard pages Thomas Gleixner
2019-03-31 21:40 ` [patch 08/14] x86/cpu_entry_area: Provide exception stack accessor Thomas Gleixner
2019-03-31 21:40 ` [patch 09/14] x86/traps: Use cpu_entry_area instead of orig_ist Thomas Gleixner
2019-03-31 21:40 ` [patch 10/14] x86/irq/64: Use cpu entry area " Thomas Gleixner
2019-03-31 21:40 ` [patch 11/14] x86/dumpstack/64: Use cpu_entry_area " Thomas Gleixner
2019-03-31 21:40 ` [patch 12/14] x86/cpu: Prepare TSS.IST setup for guard pages Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-02 16:57 ` Sean Christopherson
2019-03-31 21:40 ` [patch 13/14] x86/cpu: Remove orig_ist array Thomas Gleixner
2019-03-31 21:40 ` [patch 14/14] x86/exceptions: Enable IST guard pages Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-02 10:19 ` [patch 15/14] x86/dumpstack/64: Speedup in_exception_stack() Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-02 15:43 ` Josh Poimboeuf [this message]
2019-04-02 15:48 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-02 15:51 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-04-02 15:53 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-04-03 8:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-04-03 8:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-04-03 15:11 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2019-04-02 16:11 ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-04-02 18:27 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-02 19:29 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-03 0:36 ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-04-03 16:26 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-03 19:42 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-04 0:03 ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-04-02 19:02 ` Rasmus Villemoes
2019-04-02 19:21 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-03 8:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-04-01 4:03 ` [patch 00/14] x86/exceptions: Add guard patches to IST stacks Andy Lutomirski
2019-04-03 16:30 ` Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190402154329.scp7i7uqevubgwrz@treble \
--to=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®