mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] lkdtm/bugs: fix build error in lkdtm_EXHAUST_STACK
@ 2019-08-27 16:44 Raul E Rangel
  2019-08-27 17:49 ` Kees Cook
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Raul E Rangel @ 2019-08-27 16:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: keescook; +Cc: Raul E Rangel, Greg Kroah-Hartman, Arnd Bergmann, linux-kernel

Building an x86 64 bit kernel:

lkdtm/bugs.c:94:2: error: format '%d' expects argument of type 'int', but argument 2 has type 'long unsigned int' [-Werror=format=]
  pr_info("Calling function with %d frame size to depth %d ...\n",
  ^

Fixes: 24cccab42c419 ("lkdtm/bugs: Adjust recursion test to avoid elision")

Signed-off-by: Raul E Rangel <rrangel@chromium.org>
---

 drivers/misc/lkdtm/bugs.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/misc/lkdtm/bugs.c b/drivers/misc/lkdtm/bugs.c
index 1606658b9b7e..bf945704f21a 100644
--- a/drivers/misc/lkdtm/bugs.c
+++ b/drivers/misc/lkdtm/bugs.c
@@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ void lkdtm_LOOP(void)
 
 void lkdtm_EXHAUST_STACK(void)
 {
-	pr_info("Calling function with %d frame size to depth %d ...\n",
+	pr_info("Calling function with %lu frame size to depth %d ...\n",
 		REC_STACK_SIZE, recur_count);
 	recursive_loop(recur_count);
 	pr_info("FAIL: survived without exhausting stack?!\n");
-- 
2.23.0.187.g17f5b7556c-goog


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] lkdtm/bugs: fix build error in lkdtm_EXHAUST_STACK
  2019-08-27 16:44 [PATCH] lkdtm/bugs: fix build error in lkdtm_EXHAUST_STACK Raul E Rangel
@ 2019-08-27 17:49 ` Kees Cook
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Kees Cook @ 2019-08-27 17:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, Raul E Rangel; +Cc: Arnd Bergmann, linux-kernel

On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 10:44:13AM -0600, Raul E Rangel wrote:
> Building an x86 64 bit kernel:
> 
> lkdtm/bugs.c:94:2: error: format '%d' expects argument of type 'int', but argument 2 has type 'long unsigned int' [-Werror=format=]
>   pr_info("Calling function with %d frame size to depth %d ...\n",
>   ^
> 
> Fixes: 24cccab42c419 ("lkdtm/bugs: Adjust recursion test to avoid elision")
> 
> Signed-off-by: Raul E Rangel <rrangel@chromium.org>

Ah yes; thanks! I should build with W=1 more often. :)

Acked-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>

Greg, can you take this into drivers/misc please?

-Kees

> ---
> 
>  drivers/misc/lkdtm/bugs.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/misc/lkdtm/bugs.c b/drivers/misc/lkdtm/bugs.c
> index 1606658b9b7e..bf945704f21a 100644
> --- a/drivers/misc/lkdtm/bugs.c
> +++ b/drivers/misc/lkdtm/bugs.c
> @@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ void lkdtm_LOOP(void)
>  
>  void lkdtm_EXHAUST_STACK(void)
>  {
> -	pr_info("Calling function with %d frame size to depth %d ...\n",
> +	pr_info("Calling function with %lu frame size to depth %d ...\n",
>  		REC_STACK_SIZE, recur_count);
>  	recursive_loop(recur_count);
>  	pr_info("FAIL: survived without exhausting stack?!\n");
> -- 
> 2.23.0.187.g17f5b7556c-goog
> 

-- 
Kees Cook

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2019-08-28 17:36 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-08-27 16:44 [PATCH] lkdtm/bugs: fix build error in lkdtm_EXHAUST_STACK Raul E Rangel
2019-08-27 17:49 ` Kees Cook

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®