From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
To: Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Cc: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk>,
linux-kernel@lists.codethink.co.uk,
Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
rcu@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rcu: add declarations of undeclared items
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2019 18:41:33 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191015014133.GK2689@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191014175123.GC105106@google.com>
On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 01:51:23PM -0400, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 09:44:30PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 06:08:24PM +0100, Ben Dooks wrote:
> > > The rcu_state, rcu_rnp_online_cpus and rcu_dynticks_curr_cpu_in_eqs
> > > do not have declarations in a header. Add these to remove the
> > > following sparse warnings:
> > >
> > > kernel/rcu/tree.c:87:18: warning: symbol 'rcu_state' was not declared. Should it be static?
> > > kernel/rcu/tree.c:191:15: warning: symbol 'rcu_rnp_online_cpus' was not declared. Should it be static?
> > > kernel/rcu/tree.c:297:6: warning: symbol 'rcu_dynticks_curr_cpu_in_eqs' was not declared. Should it be static?
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk>
> >
> > Good catch!
> >
> > However, these guys (plus one more) are actually used only in the
> > kernel/rcu/tree.o translation unit, so they can be marked static.
> > I made this change as shown below with your Reported-by.
> >
> > Seem reasonable?
> >
>
> LGTM.
>
> Reviewed-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Applied, thank you!
Thanx, Paul
> thanks,
>
> - Joel
>
> > Thanx, Paul
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > commit 02995691aa76f3e52599d4f9d9d1ab23c3574f32
> > Author: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
> > Date: Fri Oct 11 21:40:09 2019 -0700
> >
> > rcu: Mark non-global functions and variables as static
> >
> > Each of rcu_state, rcu_rnp_online_cpus(), rcu_dynticks_curr_cpu_in_eqs(),
> > and rcu_dynticks_snap() are used only in the kernel/rcu/tree.o translation
> > unit, and may thus be marked static. This commit therefore makes this
> > change.
> >
> > Reported-by: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk>
> > Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> > index b18fa3d..278798e 100644
> > --- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> > +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> > @@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ static DEFINE_PER_CPU_SHARED_ALIGNED(struct rcu_data, rcu_data) = {
> > .dynticks_nmi_nesting = DYNTICK_IRQ_NONIDLE,
> > .dynticks = ATOMIC_INIT(RCU_DYNTICK_CTRL_CTR),
> > };
> > -struct rcu_state rcu_state = {
> > +static struct rcu_state rcu_state = {
> > .level = { &rcu_state.node[0] },
> > .gp_state = RCU_GP_IDLE,
> > .gp_seq = (0UL - 300UL) << RCU_SEQ_CTR_SHIFT,
> > @@ -189,7 +189,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rcu_get_gp_kthreads_prio);
> > * held, but the bit corresponding to the current CPU will be stable
> > * in most contexts.
> > */
> > -unsigned long rcu_rnp_online_cpus(struct rcu_node *rnp)
> > +static unsigned long rcu_rnp_online_cpus(struct rcu_node *rnp)
> > {
> > return READ_ONCE(rnp->qsmaskinitnext);
> > }
> > @@ -295,7 +295,7 @@ static void rcu_dynticks_eqs_online(void)
> > *
> > * No ordering, as we are sampling CPU-local information.
> > */
> > -bool rcu_dynticks_curr_cpu_in_eqs(void)
> > +static bool rcu_dynticks_curr_cpu_in_eqs(void)
> > {
> > struct rcu_data *rdp = this_cpu_ptr(&rcu_data);
> >
> > @@ -306,7 +306,7 @@ bool rcu_dynticks_curr_cpu_in_eqs(void)
> > * Snapshot the ->dynticks counter with full ordering so as to allow
> > * stable comparison of this counter with past and future snapshots.
> > */
> > -int rcu_dynticks_snap(struct rcu_data *rdp)
> > +static int rcu_dynticks_snap(struct rcu_data *rdp)
> > {
> > int snap = atomic_add_return(0, &rdp->dynticks);
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.h b/kernel/rcu/tree.h
> > index 1540542..f8e6c70 100644
> > --- a/kernel/rcu/tree.h
> > +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.h
> > @@ -402,8 +402,6 @@ static const char *tp_rcu_varname __used __tracepoint_string = rcu_name;
> > #define RCU_NAME rcu_name
> > #endif /* #else #ifdef CONFIG_TRACING */
> >
> > -int rcu_dynticks_snap(struct rcu_data *rdp);
> > -
> > /* Forward declarations for tree_plugin.h */
> > static void rcu_bootup_announce(void);
> > static void rcu_qs(void);
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-15 1:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-11 17:08 Ben Dooks
2019-10-12 4:44 ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-10-14 7:16 ` Ben Dooks
2019-10-14 17:51 ` Joel Fernandes
2019-10-15 1:41 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191015014133.GK2689@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72 \
--to=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@lists.codethink.co.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®