From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
To: David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM>
Cc: 'Eric Dumazet' <edumazet@google.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
Subject: Re: Confused about hlist_unhashed_lockless()
Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2020 07:58:39 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200203155839.GK2935@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <26258e70c35e4c108173a27317e64a0b@AcuMS.aculab.com>
On Mon, Feb 03, 2020 at 03:45:54PM +0000, David Laight wrote:
> From: Eric Dumazet
> > Sent: 31 January 2020 18:53
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 10:48 AM Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> wrote:
> > >
> >
> > > This is nice, now with have data_race()
> > >
> > > Remember these patches were sent 2 months ago, at a time we were
> > > trying to sort out things.
> > >
> > > data_race() was merged a few days ago.
> >
> > Well, actually data_race() is not there yet anyway.
>
> Shouldn't it be NO_DATA_RACE() ??
No, because you use data_race() when there really are data races, but you
want KCSAN to ignore them. For example, diagnostic code that doesn't
participate in the actual concurrency design and that doesn't run all
that often might use data_race(). For another example, if a developer
knew that data races existed, but that the compiler could not reasonably
do anything untoward with those data races, that developer might well
choose to use data_race() instead of READ_ONCE(). Especially if the
access in question was on a fastpath where helpful compiler optimizations
would be prohibited by use of READ_ONCE().
Thanx, Paul
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-03 15:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-01-31 16:43 Will Deacon
2020-01-31 16:48 ` Eric Dumazet
2020-01-31 16:57 ` Will Deacon
2020-01-31 17:06 ` Eric Dumazet
2020-01-31 17:20 ` Will Deacon
2020-01-31 17:33 ` Eric Dumazet
2020-01-31 18:32 ` Will Deacon
2020-01-31 19:47 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-01-31 20:52 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-01-31 18:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-01-31 18:48 ` Eric Dumazet
2020-01-31 18:52 ` Eric Dumazet
2020-01-31 20:53 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-01-31 21:04 ` Eric Dumazet
2020-01-31 21:19 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-02-03 15:45 ` David Laight
2020-02-03 15:54 ` Marco Elver
2020-02-03 16:05 ` David Laight
2020-02-03 17:25 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-02-03 15:58 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2020-02-03 16:02 ` Will Deacon
2020-02-03 17:29 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-02-03 18:27 ` Will Deacon
2020-02-03 21:16 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-01-31 19:20 ` Marco Elver
2020-01-31 18:52 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-01-31 18:55 ` Eric Dumazet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200203155839.GK2935@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72 \
--to=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=David.Laight@ACULAB.COM \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=elver@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®