From: SeongJae Park <sjpark@amazon.com>
To: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
Cc: SeongJae Park <sjpark@amazon.com>, Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>,
<akpm@linux-foundation.org>, <apw@canonical.com>,
SeongJae Park <sjpark@amazon.de>, <colin.king@canonical.com>,
<sj38.park@gmail.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<kristen.c.accardi@intel.com>, <mishi@linux.com>,
<skhan@linuxfoundation.org>, <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH v4 0/2] Recommend denylist/allowlist instead of blacklist/whitelist
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2020 10:30:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200611083035.23008-1-sjpark@amazon.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <38ac91ab-ced3-8a4f-b825-4503fdcddeb8@suse.cz> (raw)
On Thu, 11 Jun 2020 10:16:09 +0200 Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz> wrote:
> On 11. 06. 20, 9:38, SeongJae Park wrote:
> > On Wed, 10 Jun 2020 23:35:24 -0700 Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, 2020-06-11 at 08:25 +0200, SeongJae Park wrote:
> >>> From: SeongJae Park <sjpark@amazon.de>
> >>>
> >>> This patchset 1) adds support of deprecated terms in the 'checkpatch.pl'
> >>> and 2) set the 'blacklist' and 'whitelist' as deprecated with
> >>> replacement suggestion of 'denylist' and 'allowlist', because the
> >>> suggestions are incontrovertible, doesn't make people hurt, and more
> >>> self-explanatory.
> >>
> >> While the checkpatch implementation is better,
> >> I'm still very "meh" about the whole concept.
> >
> > I can understand your concerns about politic things in the second patch.
> > However, the concept of the 'deprecated terms' in the first patch is not
> > political but applicable to the general cases. We already had the commits[1]
> > for a similar case. So, could you ack for at least the first patch?
> >
> > [1] https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=Linux-Kernel-Hugs
>
> Fuck you! replaced by hug you! is a completely different story. The
> former is indeed offending to majority (despite it's quite common to
> tell someone "fuck you" in my subregion; OTOH hugging, no way -- I'm a
> straight non-communist). If it turns out that any word (e.g. blacklist)
> offends _majority_ (or at least a significant part of it) of some
> minority or culture, then sure, we should send it to /dev/null. But we
> should by no means listen to extreme individuals.
Thank you for the opinion. But, my point here is, deprecating some terms would
occur in general as the f-word to hug replacement was, and the first patch is a
simple technical preparation for such case. And, therefore, it would not need
to be blocked due to the second patch.
For example, as it seems at least you and I agree on the f-word to hug
replacement, we could add ``fuck||hug`` in the `deprecated_terms.txt` file to
avoid future spread of the f-words.
Also, I personally don't think the second patch as a political extreme change
but just a right thing to do. Nonetheless, I also understand people could
think in different ways. Moreover, it is obviously non-technical thing which I
am really bad at.
For the reason, I am CC-ing the code of conduct committees[1]. I would like to
hear their opinions on this.
[1] https://www.kernel.org/code-of-conduct.html
Thanks,
SeongJae Park
>
> thanks,
> --
> js
> suse labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-11 8:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-11 6:25 SeongJae Park
2020-06-11 6:25 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] checkpatch: support deprecated terms checking SeongJae Park
2020-07-25 13:02 ` Michał Mirosław
2020-07-25 16:36 ` Joe Perches
2020-07-25 17:29 ` Joe Perches
2020-07-25 23:35 ` SeongJae Park
2020-07-26 4:27 ` Joe Perches
2020-07-26 7:18 ` SeongJae Park
2020-07-26 7:29 ` Joe Perches
2020-07-26 7:45 ` SeongJae Park
2020-07-26 14:50 ` Joe Perches
2020-07-26 15:36 ` SeongJae Park
2020-07-26 16:42 ` Joe Perches
2020-07-26 18:07 ` SeongJae Park
2020-07-26 20:33 ` Michał Mirosław
2020-07-27 6:54 ` SeongJae Park
2020-07-27 20:44 ` Andrew Morton
2020-07-27 20:49 ` Joe Perches
2020-07-28 6:22 ` SeongJae Park
2020-06-11 6:25 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] scripts/deprecated_terms: Recommend denylist/allowlist instead of blacklist/whitelist SeongJae Park
2020-06-11 6:35 ` [PATCH v4 0/2] " Joe Perches
2020-06-11 7:38 ` SeongJae Park
2020-06-11 8:16 ` Jiri Slaby
2020-06-11 8:30 ` SeongJae Park [this message]
2020-06-11 8:32 ` Jiri Slaby
2020-06-11 10:43 ` Joe Perches
2020-06-12 6:40 ` SeongJae Park
2020-06-12 7:05 ` Joe Perches
2020-06-12 14:40 ` Michael Ellerman
2020-06-14 21:29 ` Pavel Machek
2020-06-15 4:21 ` Jiri Slaby
2020-06-15 6:12 ` Pavel Machek
2020-06-15 6:46 ` SeongJae Park
2020-06-15 7:00 ` Joe Perches
2020-06-15 7:39 ` Pavel Machek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200611083035.23008-1-sjpark@amazon.com \
--to=sjpark@amazon.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=apw@canonical.com \
--cc=colin.king@canonical.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=joe@perches.com \
--cc=jslaby@suse.cz \
--cc=kristen.c.accardi@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mishi@linux.com \
--cc=sj38.park@gmail.com \
--cc=sjpark@amazon.de \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®