From: Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Julien Desfossez <jdesfossez@digitalocean.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Vineeth Pillai <viremana@linux.microsoft.com>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>,
Aaron Lu <aaron.lwe@gmail.com>,
Aubrey Li <aubrey.intel@gmail.com>,
Dhaval Giani <dhaval.giani@oracle.com>,
Chris Hyser <chris.hyser@oracle.com>,
Nishanth Aravamudan <naravamudan@digitalocean.com>,
mingo@kernel.org, pjt@google.com, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, fweisbec@gmail.com,
keescook@chromium.org, kerrnel@google.com,
Phil Auld <pauld@redhat.com>,
Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
vineeth@bitbyteword.org, Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>,
Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@ubuntu.com>,
Agata Gruza <agata.gruza@intel.com>,
Antonio Gomez Iglesias <antonio.gomez.iglesias@intel.com>,
graf@amazon.com, konrad.wilk@oracle.com, dfaggioli@suse.com,
rostedt@goodmis.org, derkling@google.com, benbjiang@tencent.com,
Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@linux.intel.com>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@intel.com>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v7 17/23] kernel/entry: Add support for core-wide protection of kernel-mode
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2020 21:29:05 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200902012905.GB1703315@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <875z8xl0zh.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Hi Thomas,
On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 10:02:10PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
[..]
> > The reason for that is, the loop can switch into another thread, so we
> > have to do unsafe_exit() for the old thread, and unsafe_enter() for
> > the new one while handling the tif work properly. We could get
> > migrated to another CPU in this loop itself, AFAICS. So the
> > unsafe_enter() / unsafe_exit() calls could also happen on different
> > CPUs.
>
> That's fine. It still does not justify to make everything slower even if
> that 'pretend that HT is secure' thing is disabled.
>
> Something like the below should be sufficient to do what you want
> while restricting the wreckage to the 'pretend ht is secure' case.
>
> The generated code for the CONFIG_PRETENT_HT_SECURE=n case is the same
When you say 'pretend', did you mean 'make' ? The point of this patch is to
protect the kernel from the other hyperthread thus making HT secure for the
kernel contexts and not merely pretending.
> as without the patch. With CONFIG_PRETENT_HT_SECURE=y the impact is
> exactly two NOP-ed out jumps if the muck is not enabled on the command
> line which should be the default behaviour.
I see where you're coming from, I'll try to rework it to be less intrusive
when core-scheduling is disabled. Some more comments below:
> Thanks,
>
> tglx
>
> ---
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/include/linux/pretend_ht_secure.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
> +#ifndef _LINUX_PRETEND_HT_SECURE_H
> +#define _LINUX_PRETEND_HT_SECURE_H
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PRETEND_HT_SECURE
> +static inline void enter_from_user_ht_sucks(void)
> +{
> + if (static_branch_unlikely(&pretend_ht_secure_key))
> + enter_from_user_pretend_ht_is_secure();
> +}
> +
> +static inline void exit_to_user_ht_sucks(void)
> +{
> + if (static_branch_unlikely(&pretend_ht_secure_key))
> + exit_to_user_pretend_ht_is_secure();
We already have similar config and static keys for the core-scheduling
feature itself. Can we just make it depend on that?
Or, are you saying users may want 'core scheduling' enabled but may want to
leave out the kernel protection?
> +}
> +#else
> +static inline void enter_from_user_ht_sucks(void) { }
> +static inline void exit_to_user_ht_sucks(void) { }
> +#endif
> +
> +#endif
> --- a/kernel/entry/common.c
> +++ b/kernel/entry/common.c
> @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
> * 1) Tell lockdep that interrupts are disabled
> * 2) Invoke context tracking if enabled to reactivate RCU
> * 3) Trace interrupts off state
> + * 4) Pretend that HT is secure
> */
> static __always_inline void enter_from_user_mode(struct pt_regs *regs)
> {
> @@ -28,6 +29,7 @@ static __always_inline void enter_from_u
>
> instrumentation_begin();
> trace_hardirqs_off_finish();
> + enter_from_user_ht_sucks();
> instrumentation_end();
> }
>
> @@ -111,6 +113,12 @@ static __always_inline void exit_to_user
> /* Workaround to allow gradual conversion of architecture code */
> void __weak arch_do_signal(struct pt_regs *regs) { }
>
> +static inline unsigned long exit_to_user_get_work(void)
> +{
> + exit_to_user_ht_sucks();
Ok, one issue with your patch is it does not take care of the waiting logic.
sched_core_unsafe_exit_wait() needs to be called *after* all of the
exit_to_user_mode_work is processed. This is because
sched_core_unsafe_exit_wait() also checks for any new exit-to-usermode-work
that popped up while it is spinning and breaks out of its spin-till-safe loop
early. This is key to solving the stop-machine issue. If the stopper needs to
run, then the need-resched flag will be set and we break out of the spin and
redo the whole exit_to_user_mode_loop() as it should.
I agree with the need to make the ASM suck less if the feature is turned off
though, and I can try to cook something along those lines. Thanks for the idea!
thanks,
- Joel
> + return READ_ONCE(current_thread_info()->flags);
> +}
> +
> static unsigned long exit_to_user_mode_loop(struct pt_regs *regs,
> unsigned long ti_work)
> {
> @@ -149,7 +157,7 @@ static unsigned long exit_to_user_mode_l
> * enabled above.
> */
> local_irq_disable_exit_to_user();
> - ti_work = READ_ONCE(current_thread_info()->flags);
> + ti_work = exit_to_user_get_work();
> }
>
> /* Return the latest work state for arch_exit_to_user_mode() */
> @@ -158,7 +166,7 @@ static unsigned long exit_to_user_mode_l
>
> static void exit_to_user_mode_prepare(struct pt_regs *regs)
> {
> - unsigned long ti_work = READ_ONCE(current_thread_info()->flags);
> + unsigned long ti_work = exit_to_user_get_work();
>
> lockdep_assert_irqs_disabled();
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-02 1:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 66+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-08-28 19:51 [RFC PATCH v7 00/23] Core scheduling v7 Julien Desfossez
2020-08-28 19:51 ` [RFC PATCH v7 01/23] sched: Wrap rq::lock access Julien Desfossez
2020-08-28 19:51 ` [RFC PATCH v7 02/23] sched: Introduce sched_class::pick_task() Julien Desfossez
2020-08-28 19:51 ` [RFC PATCH v7 03/23] sched: Core-wide rq->lock Julien Desfossez
2020-08-28 19:51 ` [RFC PATCH v7 04/23] sched/fair: Add a few assertions Julien Desfossez
2020-08-28 19:51 ` [RFC PATCH v7 05/23] sched: Basic tracking of matching tasks Julien Desfossez
2020-08-28 19:51 ` [RFC PATCH v7 06/23] bitops: Introduce find_next_or_bit Julien Desfossez
2020-09-03 5:13 ` Randy Dunlap
2020-08-28 19:51 ` [RFC PATCH v7 07/23] cpumask: Introduce a new iterator for_each_cpu_wrap_or Julien Desfossez
2020-08-28 19:51 ` [RFC PATCH v7 08/23] sched: Add core wide task selection and scheduling Julien Desfossez
2020-08-28 20:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-08-28 22:02 ` Vineeth Pillai
2020-08-28 22:23 ` Joel Fernandes
2020-08-29 7:47 ` peterz
2020-08-31 13:01 ` Vineeth Pillai
2020-08-31 14:24 ` Joel Fernandes
2020-09-01 3:38 ` Joel Fernandes
2020-09-01 5:10 ` Joel Fernandes
2020-09-01 12:34 ` Vineeth Pillai
2020-09-01 17:30 ` Joel Fernandes
2020-09-01 21:23 ` Vineeth Pillai
2020-09-02 1:11 ` Joel Fernandes
2020-08-28 20:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-08-28 22:15 ` Vineeth Pillai
2020-09-15 20:08 ` Joel Fernandes
2020-08-28 19:51 ` [RFC PATCH v7 09/23] sched/fair: Fix forced idle sibling starvation corner case Julien Desfossez
2020-08-28 21:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-08-28 23:24 ` Vineeth Pillai
2020-08-28 19:51 ` [RFC PATCH v7 10/23] sched/fair: wrapper for cfs_rq->min_vruntime Julien Desfossez
2020-08-28 19:51 ` [RFC PATCH v7 11/23] sched/fair: core wide cfs task priority comparison Julien Desfossez
2020-08-28 21:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-09-17 14:15 ` Vineeth Pillai
2020-09-17 20:39 ` Vineeth Pillai
2020-09-23 1:46 ` Joel Fernandes
2020-09-23 1:52 ` Joel Fernandes
2020-09-25 15:02 ` Joel Fernandes
2020-09-15 21:49 ` chris hyser
[not found] ` <81b208ad-b9e6-bfbf-631e-02e9f75d73a2@linux.intel.com>
2020-09-16 14:24 ` chris hyser
2020-09-16 20:53 ` chris hyser
2020-09-17 1:09 ` Li, Aubrey
2020-08-28 19:51 ` [RFC PATCH v7 12/23] sched: Trivial forced-newidle balancer Julien Desfossez
2020-09-02 7:08 ` Pavan Kondeti
2020-08-28 19:51 ` [RFC PATCH v7 13/23] sched: migration changes for core scheduling Julien Desfossez
2020-08-28 19:51 ` [RFC PATCH v7 14/23] irq_work: Add support to detect if work is pending Julien Desfossez
2020-08-28 19:51 ` [RFC PATCH v7 15/23] entry/idle: Add a common function for activites during idle entry/exit Julien Desfossez
2020-08-28 19:51 ` [RFC PATCH v7 16/23] arch/x86: Add a new TIF flag for untrusted tasks Julien Desfossez
2020-08-28 19:51 ` [RFC PATCH v7 17/23] kernel/entry: Add support for core-wide protection of kernel-mode Julien Desfossez
2020-09-01 15:54 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-01 16:50 ` Joel Fernandes
2020-09-01 20:02 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-02 1:29 ` Joel Fernandes [this message]
2020-09-02 7:53 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-02 15:12 ` Joel Fernandes
2020-09-02 16:57 ` Dario Faggioli
2020-09-03 4:34 ` Joel Fernandes
2020-09-03 11:05 ` Vineeth Pillai
2020-09-03 13:20 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-09-03 20:30 ` Joel Fernandes
2020-09-03 13:43 ` Dario Faggioli
2020-09-03 20:25 ` Joel Fernandes
2020-08-28 19:51 ` [RFC PATCH v7 18/23] entry/idle: Enter and exit kernel protection during idle entry and exit Julien Desfossez
2020-08-28 19:51 ` [RFC PATCH v7 19/23] entry/kvm: Protect the kernel when entering from guest Julien Desfossez
2020-08-28 19:51 ` [RFC PATCH v7 20/23] sched/coresched: config option for kernel protection Julien Desfossez
2020-08-28 19:51 ` [RFC PATCH v7 21/23] sched: cgroup tagging interface for core scheduling Julien Desfossez
2020-08-28 19:51 ` [RFC PATCH v7 22/23] Documentation: Add documentation on " Julien Desfossez
2020-08-28 19:51 ` [RFC PATCH v7 23/23] sched: Debug bits Julien Desfossez
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200902012905.GB1703315@google.com \
--to=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=aaron.lwe@gmail.com \
--cc=agata.gruza@intel.com \
--cc=antonio.gomez.iglesias@intel.com \
--cc=aubrey.intel@gmail.com \
--cc=aubrey.li@linux.intel.com \
--cc=benbjiang@tencent.com \
--cc=chris.hyser@oracle.com \
--cc=christian.brauner@ubuntu.com \
--cc=derkling@google.com \
--cc=dfaggioli@suse.com \
--cc=dhaval.giani@oracle.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=graf@amazon.com \
--cc=jdesfossez@digitalocean.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=kerrnel@google.com \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=naravamudan@digitalocean.com \
--cc=pauld@redhat.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pjt@google.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tim.c.chen@intel.com \
--cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=valentin.schneider@arm.com \
--cc=vineeth@bitbyteword.org \
--cc=viremana@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=yu.c.chen@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome