From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
To: Michael Brunner <Michael.Brunner@kontron.com>
Cc: "lee.jones@linaro.org" <lee.jones@linaro.org>,
"sameo@linux.intel.com" <sameo@linux.intel.com>,
"mibru@gmx.de" <mibru@gmx.de>,
"vkrasnov@dev.rtsoft.ru" <vkrasnov@dev.rtsoft.ru>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"mvanyulin@dev.rtsoft.ru" <mvanyulin@dev.rtsoft.ru>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mfd: kempld-core: Check for DMI definition before ACPI
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2020 08:10:00 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201110161000.GD17288@roeck-us.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b9a01e2c8b54fbadfaff8d3a5888802ce4859ed4.camel@kontron.com>
On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 03:41:47PM +0000, Michael Brunner wrote:
> Hi Guenter,
>
> thank you for the feedback! checkpatch didn't catch this.
> I sent v2 of the patch.
>
It may have been "demoted" to --strict for whatever reason.
Guenter
> Best regards,
> Michael
>
> On Tue, 2020-11-10 at 06:39 -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > On 11/9/20 11:46 PM, Michael Brunner wrote:
> > > Change the detection order to priorize DMI table entries over
> > > available
> > > ACPI entries.
> > >
> > > This makes it more easy for product developers to patch product
> > > specific
> > > handling into the driver.
> > > Furthermore it allows to simplify the implementation a bit and
> > > especially to remove the need to force synchronous probing.
> > >
> > > Based on the following commit introduced with v5.10-rc1:
> > > commit e8299c7313af ("mfd: Add ACPI support to Kontron PLD driver")
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Michael Brunner <michael.brunner@kontron.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/mfd/kempld-core.c | 23 ++---------------------
> > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/mfd/kempld-core.c b/drivers/mfd/kempld-core.c
> > > index 2c9295953c11..aa7f386646a1 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/mfd/kempld-core.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/mfd/kempld-core.c
> > > @@ -125,7 +125,6 @@ static const struct kempld_platform_data
> > > kempld_platform_data_generic = {
> > > };
> > >
> > > static struct platform_device *kempld_pdev;
> > > -static bool kempld_acpi_mode;
> > >
> > > static int kempld_create_platform_device(const struct
> > > dmi_system_id *id)
> > > {
> > > @@ -501,8 +500,6 @@ static int kempld_probe(struct platform_device
> > > *pdev)
> > > ret = kempld_get_acpi_data(pdev);
> > > if (ret)
> > > return ret;
> > > -
> > > - kempld_acpi_mode = true;
> > > } else if (kempld_pdev != pdev) {
> > > /*
> > > * The platform device we are probing is not the one we
> > > @@ -565,7 +562,6 @@ static struct platform_driver kempld_driver = {
> > > .driver = {
> > > .name = "kempld",
> > > .acpi_match_table = ACPI_PTR(kempld_acpi_table),
> > > - .probe_type = PROBE_FORCE_SYNCHRONOUS,
> > > },
> > > .probe = kempld_probe,
> > > .remove = kempld_remove,
> > > @@ -884,7 +880,6 @@ MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(dmi, kempld_dmi_table);
> > > static int __init kempld_init(void)
> > > {
> > > const struct dmi_system_id *id;
> > > - int ret;
> > >
> > > if (force_device_id[0]) {
> > > for (id = kempld_dmi_table;
> > > @@ -894,24 +889,10 @@ static int __init kempld_init(void)
> > > break;
> > > if (id->matches[0].slot == DMI_NONE)
> > > return -ENODEV;
> > > - }
> > > -
> > > - ret = platform_driver_register(&kempld_driver);
> > > - if (ret)
> > > - return ret;
> > > -
> > > - /*
> > > - * With synchronous probing the device should already be probed
> > > now.
> > > - * If no device id is forced and also no ACPI definition for
> > > the
> > > - * device was found, scan DMI table as fallback.
> > > - *
> > > - * If drivers_autoprobing is disabled and the device is found
> > > here,
> > > - * only that device can be bound manually later.
> > > - */
> > > - if (!kempld_pdev && !kempld_acpi_mode)
> > > + } else
> >
> > } else {
> > > dmi_check_system(kempld_dmi_table);
> > }
> >
> > Guenter
> >
> > >
> > > - return 0;
> > > + return platform_driver_register(&kempld_driver);
> > > }
> > >
> > > static void __exit kempld_exit(void)
> > >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-10 16:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-10 7:46 Michael Brunner
2020-11-10 14:39 ` Guenter Roeck
2020-11-10 15:41 ` Michael Brunner
2020-11-10 16:10 ` Guenter Roeck [this message]
2020-11-10 15:23 ` [PATCH v2] " Michael Brunner
2020-11-10 16:11 ` Guenter Roeck
2020-11-13 10:14 ` Lee Jones
2020-11-13 10:16 ` Lee Jones
2020-11-16 6:46 ` Michael Brunner
2020-11-16 6:42 ` [PATCH v3] " Michael Brunner
2020-11-27 7:53 ` Lee Jones
2020-11-30 13:08 ` Michael Brunner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201110161000.GD17288@roeck-us.net \
--to=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=Michael.Brunner@kontron.com \
--cc=lee.jones@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mibru@gmx.de \
--cc=mvanyulin@dev.rtsoft.ru \
--cc=sameo@linux.intel.com \
--cc=vkrasnov@dev.rtsoft.ru \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome