From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: Punit Agrawal <punitagrawal@gmail.com>
Cc: rjw@rjwysocki.net, wei.huang2@amd.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
x86@kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/4] x86/cpu: amd: Define processor families
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2020 15:00:18 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201130140018.GC6019@zn.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201125144847.3920-4-punitagrawal@gmail.com>
On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 11:48:46PM +0900, Punit Agrawal wrote:
> So far, the AMD processor identifier (family, models, stepping) are
> referred to by raw values making it easy to make mistakes. It is also
> harder to read and maintain. Additionally, these values are also being
> used in subsystems outside the arch code where not everybody maybe be
> as familiar with the processor identifiers.
>
> As a first step towards improving the status quo, add macros for the
> AMD processor families and propagate them through the existing
> cpu_device_id.h header used for this purpose.
>
> Signed-off-by: Punit Agrawal <punitagrawal@gmail.com>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
> Cc: x86@kernel.org
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/amd-family.h | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
> arch/x86/include/asm/cpu_device_id.h | 2 ++
> 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 arch/x86/include/asm/amd-family.h
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/amd-family.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/amd-family.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..dff4d13b8e74
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/amd-family.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> +#ifndef _ASM_X86_AMD_FAMILY_H
> +#define _ASM_X86_AMD_FAMILY_H
> +
> +#define AMD_FAM_K5 0x04
> +#define AMD_FAM_K6 0x05
> +#define AMD_FAM_K7 0x06
> +#define AMD_FAM_K8 0x0F
> +#define AMD_FAM_K10 0x10
Fam 0x10 is Greyhound and a lot more core names. I'd let the AMD folks
on Cc say what they wanna call it but I don't think K10 was used
anywhere except outside of AMD. :)
> +#define AMD_FAM_K8_K10_HYBRID 0x11
That was called Griffin so AMD_FAM_GRIFFIN I guess. If not used anywhere
in the tree, no need to add the define. Same holds true for the rest of
the defines - add them only when they're used.
> +#define AMD_FAM_LLANO 0x12
> +#define AMD_FAM_BOBCAT 0x14
> +#define AMD_FAM_BULLDOZER 0x15
> +#define AMD_FAM_JAGUAR 0x16
> +#define AMD_FAM_ZEN 0x17
ZEN2 is also 0x17 but different models so this is where the family
matching scheme doesn't work - you'd need the models too.
0x18 is HYGON
> +#define AMD_FAM_ZEN3 0x19
> +
> +#endif /* _ASM_X86_AMD_FAMILY_H */
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpu_device_id.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpu_device_id.h
> index eb8fcede9e3b..bbb48ba4c7ff 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpu_device_id.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpu_device_id.h
> @@ -12,6 +12,8 @@
> #include <linux/mod_devicetable.h>
> /* Get the INTEL_FAM* model defines */
> #include <asm/intel-family.h>
> +/* Get the AMD model defines */
> +#include <asm/amd-family.h>
> /* And the X86_VENDOR_* ones */
> #include <asm/processor.h>
>
> --
> 2.29.2
>
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-30 14:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-25 14:48 [RFC PATCH 0/4] Add processor to the ignore PSD override list Punit Agrawal
2020-11-25 14:48 ` [RFC PATCH 1/4] cpufreq: acpi-cpufreq: Re-factor overriding ACPI PSD Punit Agrawal
2020-12-07 19:29 ` Wei Huang
2020-12-08 23:31 ` Punit Agrawal
2020-11-25 14:48 ` [RFC PATCH 2/4] cpufreq: acpi-cpufreq: Add processor to the ignore PSD override list Punit Agrawal
2020-12-07 20:20 ` Wei Huang
2020-12-07 20:26 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-12-07 22:07 ` Wei Huang
2020-12-07 22:30 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-12-08 3:44 ` Wei Huang
2020-12-08 23:21 ` Punit Agrawal
2020-12-08 23:32 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-12-11 23:36 ` Punit Agrawal
2020-12-14 12:40 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-12-14 13:27 ` Punit Agrawal
2020-12-14 14:25 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-12-17 13:27 ` Punit Agrawal
2020-11-25 14:48 ` [RFC PATCH 3/4] x86/cpu: amd: Define processor families Punit Agrawal
2020-11-30 14:00 ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2020-12-02 14:13 ` Punit Agrawal
2020-12-02 16:57 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-11-25 14:48 ` [RFC PATCH 4/4] cpufreq: acpi-cpufreq: Use identifiers for AMD processor family Punit Agrawal
2020-11-30 14:02 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-12-02 14:30 ` Punit Agrawal
2020-12-04 22:44 ` [RFC PATCH 0/4] Add processor to the ignore PSD override list Punit Agrawal
2020-12-07 13:55 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-12-08 23:25 ` Punit Agrawal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201130140018.GC6019@zn.tnic \
--to=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=punitagrawal@gmail.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=wei.huang2@amd.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yazen.ghannam@amd.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome