mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
	Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
	Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
	Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Ben Gardon <bgardon@google.com>,
	Richard Herbert <rherbert@sympatico.ca>
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] KVM: x86/mmu: Use -1 to flag an undefined spte in get_mmio_spte()
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2020 16:31:36 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201218003139.2167891-2-seanjc@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201218003139.2167891-1-seanjc@google.com>

Return -1 from the get_walk() helpers if the shadow walk doesn't fill at
least one spte, which can theoretically happen if the walk hits a
not-present PTPDR.  Returning the root level in such a case will cause
get_mmio_spte() to return garbage (uninitialized stack data).  In
practice, such a scenario should be impossible as KVM shouldn't get a
reserved-bit page fault with a not-present PDPTR.

Note, using mmu->root_level in get_walk() is wrong for other reasons,
too, but that's now a moot point.

Fixes: 95fb5b0258b7 ("kvm: x86/mmu: Support MMIO in the TDP MMU")
Cc: Ben Gardon <bgardon@google.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c     | 7 ++++++-
 arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
index 7a6ae9e90bd7..a48cd12c01d7 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
@@ -3488,7 +3488,7 @@ static bool mmio_info_in_cache(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 addr, bool direct)
 static int get_walk(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 addr, u64 *sptes)
 {
 	struct kvm_shadow_walk_iterator iterator;
-	int leaf = vcpu->arch.mmu->root_level;
+	int leaf = -1;
 	u64 spte;
 
 
@@ -3532,6 +3532,11 @@ static bool get_mmio_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 addr, u64 *sptep)
 	else
 		leaf = get_walk(vcpu, addr, sptes);
 
+	if (unlikely(leaf < 0)) {
+		*sptep = 0ull;
+		return reserved;
+	}
+
 	rsvd_check = &vcpu->arch.mmu->shadow_zero_check;
 
 	for (level = root; level >= leaf; level--) {
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
index 84c8f06bec26..50cec7a15ddb 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
@@ -1152,8 +1152,8 @@ int kvm_tdp_mmu_get_walk(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 addr, u64 *sptes)
 {
 	struct tdp_iter iter;
 	struct kvm_mmu *mmu = vcpu->arch.mmu;
-	int leaf = vcpu->arch.mmu->shadow_root_level;
 	gfn_t gfn = addr >> PAGE_SHIFT;
+	int leaf = -1;
 
 	tdp_mmu_for_each_pte(iter, mmu, gfn, gfn + 1) {
 		leaf = iter.level;
-- 
2.29.2.684.gfbc64c5ab5-goog


  reply	other threads:[~2020-12-18  0:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-12-18  0:31 [PATCH 0/4] KVM: x86/mmu: Bug fixes and cleanups " Sean Christopherson
2020-12-18  0:31 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2020-12-18  8:58   ` [PATCH 1/4] KVM: x86/mmu: Use -1 to flag an undefined spte " Vitaly Kuznetsov
2020-12-21 17:05     ` Sean Christopherson
2020-12-18  0:31 ` [PATCH 2/4] KVM: x86/mmu: Get root level from walkers when retrieving MMIO SPTE Sean Christopherson
2020-12-18  9:10   ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2020-12-21 18:24     ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-12-21 18:30       ` Sean Christopherson
2020-12-18  0:31 ` [PATCH 3/4] KVM: x86/mmu: Use raw level to index into MMIO walks' sptes array Sean Christopherson
2020-12-18  9:18   ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2020-12-18  0:31 ` [PATCH 4/4] KVM: x86/mmu: Optimize not-present/MMIO SPTE check in get_mmio_spte() Sean Christopherson
2020-12-18  9:33   ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
     [not found] ` <2346556.XAFRqVoOGU@starbug.dom>
2020-12-18  1:27   ` [PATCH 0/4] KVM: x86/mmu: Bug fixes and cleanups " Richard Herbert
2020-12-21 18:26 ` Paolo Bonzini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201218003139.2167891-2-seanjc@google.com \
    --to=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=bgardon@google.com \
    --cc=jmattson@google.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=rherbert@sympatico.ca \
    --cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    --cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome